UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) May 11, 2010
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
Maryland | 001-34626 | 58-2328421 | ||
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation) |
(Commission File Number) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
11695 Johns Creek Parkway, Ste 350, Johns Creek, Georgia 30097
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code (770) 418-8800
(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):
¨ | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
¨ | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition
On May 11, 2010, Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (the Registrant) issued a press release announcing its financial results for the first quarter 2010 and published supplemental information for the first quarter 2010 to its website. The press release and the supplemental information are attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and 99.2, respectively, and are incorporated herein by reference. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such exhibits and the information set forth therein are deemed to have been furnished and shall not be deemed to be filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
(d) Exhibits:
Exhibit No. |
Description | |
99.1 | Press release dated May 11, 2010. | |
99.2 | Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. Quarterly Supplemental Information for the First Quarter 2010. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Current Report on Form 8-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
PIEDMONT OFFICE REALTY TRUST, INC. (Registrant) | ||
By: | /s/ Robert E. Bowers | |
Robert E. Bowers Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President |
Date: May 11, 2010
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. |
Description | |
99.1 | Press release dated May 11, 2010. | |
99.2 | Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. Quarterly Supplemental Information for the First Quarter 2010. |
Exhibit 99.1
PIEDMONT OFFICE REALTY TRUST
REPORTS FIRST QUARTER RESULTS
ATLANTA, May 11, 2010 Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (Piedmont or the Company) (NYSE: PDM), an owner of Class A properties located primarily in the ten largest U.S. office markets, today announced its results for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Donald A. Miller, CFA, President and Chief Executive Officer stated, The leasing market remains challenging but we are pleased with our execution of over 180,000 square feet of new and renewal leases at our office properties during the quarter, along with 174,000 square feet of industrial leasing activity, allowing us to maintain stable occupancy. We are focused on our future lease expirations and are committed to achieving results that will best position us to enhance future earnings growth. We continue to seek opportunities to put our balance sheet capacity to work and believe that we should have a competitive advantage in capturing portfolio transactions that will enhance our current operating footprint.
Results for the First Quarter ended March 31, 2010
Piedmonts net income available to common stockholders was $31.5 million, or $0.19 per diluted share, for the first quarter 2010, compared with the $29.0 million, or $0.18 per diluted share for the first quarter of 2009 (a 5.6 percent increase on a per share basis after accounting for the issuance of additional shares during first quarter 2010). Funds from operations (FFO) for the quarter totaled $69.2 million, or $0.42 per diluted share, compared to $68.4 million, or $0.43 per diluted share, in the first quarter of 2009. Adjusted FFO (AFFO) in the first quarter totaled $60.6 million, or $0.37 per diluted share, as compared to $59.6 million, or $0.37 per diluted share, in the first quarter 2009. Revenues for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 totaled $148.4 million compared to $153.7 million in the prior year period.
Of the 180,000 square feet of office leases executed during the first quarter of 2010, approximately one-half were renewals and the other half new leases. On March 31, 2010, the Companys office portfolio was 89.6 percent leased with a weighted average lease term remaining of 5.7 years. Same store net operating income on a cash basis was $91.9 million, down 2.6 percent from $94.4 million in the prior year period, largely attributable to a partial lease expiration at Aon Center in Chicago and rent abatements on two recently executed renewal leases.
Leasing Update
At the end of March, 2010, the Company had roughly 1.2 million square feet, or 5.8 percent of rentable square footage of its office portfolio, due to expire during 2010, with the majority of these leases scheduled to expire toward the end of the year. The Company is actively managing its upcoming lease expirations and is also in negotiation with the two largest tenants whose leases expire in 2011. The Company has already been successful in mitigating the majority of its releasing exposure associated with the expiration of the Kirkland & Ellis lease at its Aon Center property through the previously announced lease transaction with KPMG.
Balance Sheet and Capital Markets Activities
As previously communicated, Piedmonts Class A common stock became publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange on February 10, 2010. In connection with the listing, the Company issued 13.8 million Class A common shares (8.7 percent of all outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2009) in an underwritten public offering resulting in net proceeds of $184.5 million.
As of March 31, 2010, Piedmonts total gross real estate assets were $4.6 billion with total debt of $1.4 billion. Total debt-to-total gross assets was 26.6 percent and net debt (total debt less cash and cash equivalents)-to-core EBITDA was 3.7x. The Companys fixed charge coverage ratio was 4.6x. As of March 31, 2010, Piedmont had cash and capacity on its unsecured credit line of approximately $567 million and no debt maturities in 2010.
Dividend
On May 11, 2010, the board of directors of Piedmont declared dividends for the second quarter 2010 in the amount of $0.315 (31.50 cents) per share on all classes of outstanding common shares of Piedmont to stockholders of record for such shares as shown on the books of Piedmont at the close of business on June 15, 2010. Such dividends are to be paid on June 22, 2010.
Disposition of Real Estate Assets 111 Sylvan Avenue
Subsequent to quarter end, Piedmont entered into a binding purchase and sale agreement to dispose of 111 Sylvan Avenue located in Englewood Cliffs, NJ for a gross sales price of approximately $55.0 million, exclusive of closing costs, with an anticipated closing date of December 1, 2010. 111 Sylvan Avenue is a 410,000 square foot, three-story building constructed in 1953 and it is currently leased entirely to Citicorp through November of this year. Piedmont anticipates recording a $9.8 million impairment charge in the second quarter related to the write-down of this property to fair market value
in anticipation of the sale. The estimated impairment charge is subject to change as additional information becomes available in subsequent periods.
Guidance for 2010
Excluding the impairment charge related to the potential disposition set forth above, the Company reaffirms financial guidance for full-year 2010 based on managements expectations as follows:
Low | High | |||||||
Net Income (excluding the $9.8 million impairment charge) |
$ | 117 | - | $ | 124 million | |||
Add: Depreciation & Amortization |
$ | 152 | - | $ | 154 million | |||
Core Funds from Operations (excludes impairment charges) |
$ | 269 | - | $ | 278 million | |||
Core FFO per diluted share (excludes impairment charges) |
$ | 1.56 | - | $ | 1.62 |
Our anticipated $9.8 million charge on the 111 Sylvan Avenue property will not have an impact on our reported Core FFO, but it will impact FFO as previously estimated by roughly $0.055 per share. The opportunity to sell 111 Sylvan Avenue was not contemplated in our original FFO guidance. Note that individual quarters may fluctuate on both a cash and accrual basis due to timing of repairs and maintenance, capital expenditures and one-time revenue or expense events. In addition, the Companys guidance is based on information available to management as of the date of this release and does not include any future potential litigation reserve adjustments, or the impact of any potential acquisitions, divestitures or impairments.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This release contains certain supplemental non-GAAP financial measures such as FFO, AFFO, Core FFO, Same store net operating income, and Core EBITDA. See below for definitions and reconciliations of these metrics to their most comparable GAAP metric.
Conference Call Information
Piedmont has scheduled a conference call for Wednesday, May 12th, 2010 at 8:30 am Eastern Time. Dial-in numbers are (877) 407-9039 for participants in the United States and (201) 689-8470 for international participants. There will also be a live audio webcast of the call, which may be accessed on the Companys website at www.piedmontreit.com in the Investor Relations section. A replay of the conference call will be available until Wednesday May 26, 2010, and can be accessed by dialing (877) 660-6853, or (201) 612-7415 for international participants, followed by the Conference ID, 349822. An online replay will also be available after the conference call in the Investor Relations section of the Companys website.
Supplemental Information
Quarterly Supplemental Information as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2010 can be accessed on our website under the Investor Relations section at www.piedmontreit.com.
About Piedmont Office Realty Trust
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. is a fully-integrated, self-managed real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in the acquisition, ownership, management, development and disposition of primarily high-quality Class A office buildings located predominately in large U.S. office markets and leased principally to high-credit-quality tenants. Piedmont is rated as an investment-grade company by Standard & Poors and Moodys and has maintained a low-leverage strategy while acquiring over $5.5 billion in office properties over the past 12 years. Over eighty-seven percent of the Companys Annualized Lease Revenue (as defined in our SEC filings) is derived from office properties located in the ten largest U.S. office markets including Chicago, Washington D.C., the New York metropolitan area, Boston and greater Los Angeles.
Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this press release constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). We intend for all such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, as applicable. Such information is subject to certain risks and uncertainties, as well as known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Therefore, such statements are not intended to be a guarantee of our performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will, expect, intend, anticipate, believe, continue or similar words or phrases that are predictions of future events or trends and which do not relate solely to historical matters. Examples of such statements in this press release include the competitive advantage of the Company in capturing portfolio transactions that will enhance our current operating footprint; the strength of the companys leasing portfolio and lease renewal activities; the consummation of the transaction to sell 111 Sylvan Avenue and the related $9.8 million impairment charge; the Companys anticipated net income, depreciation and amortization, Core FFO, and Core FFO per share (diluted) for the year ending December 31, 2010.
The following are some of the factors that could cause the Companys actual results and its expectations to differ materially from those described in the Companys forward-looking statements: the Companys ability to successfully identify and consummate suitable acquisitions; current adverse market and economic conditions; lease terminations or lease defaults, particularly by one of the Companys large lead tenants; the impact of competition on the Companys efforts to renew existing leases or re-let space; changes in the economies and other conditions of the office market in general and of the specific markets in which the Company operates; economic and regulatory changes; additional risks and costs associated
with directly managing properties occupied by government tenants; adverse market and economic conditions and related impairments to the Companys real estate assets and other intangible assets; the success of the Companys real estate strategies and investment objectives; availability of financing; costs of complying with governmental laws and regulations; uncertainties associated with environmental and other regulatory matters; the Companys ability to continue to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code; and other factors detailed in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this press release. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements contained in this press release, and we do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Unaudited (in thousands)
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Assets: |
||||||||
Real estate assets, at cost: |
||||||||
Land |
$ | 651,876 | $ | 651,876 | ||||
Buildings and improvements |
3,672,594 | 3,663,391 | ||||||
Buildings and improvements, accumulated depreciation |
(689,117 | ) | (665,068 | ) | ||||
Intangible lease asset |
235,022 | 243,312 | ||||||
Intangible lease asset, accumulated amortization |
(145,242 | ) | (147,043 | ) | ||||
Construction in progress |
12,345 | 17,059 | ||||||
Total real estate assets |
3,737,478 | 3,763,527 | ||||||
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
43,482 | 43,940 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
76,994 | 10,004 | ||||||
Tenant receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts |
33,152 | 33,071 | ||||||
Straight line rent receivable |
95,164 | 95,371 | ||||||
Notes receivable |
59,407 | 58,739 | ||||||
Due from unconsolidated joint ventures |
1,202 | 1,083 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
18,600 | 21,456 | ||||||
Goodwill |
180,097 | 180,097 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, less accumulated amortization |
6,509 | 7,205 | ||||||
Deferred lease costs, less accumulated amortization |
176,325 | 180,852 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 4,428,410 | $ | 4,395,345 | ||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Lines of credit and notes payable |
1,402,525 | 1,516,525 | ||||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and accrued capital expenditures |
83,172 | 97,747 | ||||||
Deferred income |
39,079 | 34,506 | ||||||
Intangible lease liabilities, less accumulated amortization |
57,689 | 60,655 | ||||||
Interest rate swap |
2,316 | 3,866 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
1,584,781 | 1,713,299 | ||||||
Redeemable common stock (1) |
| 75,164 | ||||||
Shareholders equity (2) : |
||||||||
Class A common stock |
534 | 397 | ||||||
Class B-1 common stock |
397 | 397 | ||||||
Class B-2 common stock |
397 | 397 | ||||||
Class B-3 common stock |
397 | 398 | ||||||
Additional paid in capital |
3,659,257 | 3,477,168 | ||||||
Cumulative distributions in excess of earnings |
(820,878 | ) | (798,561 | ) | ||||
Redeemable common stock |
| (75,164 | ) | |||||
Other comprehensive loss |
(2,316 | ) | (3,866 | ) | ||||
Piedmont stockholders equity |
2,837,788 | 2,601,166 | ||||||
Non-controlling interest |
5,841 | 5,716 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
2,843,629 | 2,606,882 | ||||||
Total liabilities, redeemable common stock and stockholders equity |
$ | 4,428,410 | $ | 4,395,345 | ||||
Net Debt (Total debt less cash and cash equivalents) |
$ | 1,325,531 | $ | 1,506,521 | ||||
Total Gross Assets (1) |
$ | 5,262,769 | $ | 5,207,456 |
(1) | Total assets exclusive of accumulated depreciation and amortization related to real estate assets. |
1
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
Unaudited (in thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 112,106 | $ | 112,946 | ||||
Tenant reimbursements |
35,081 | 40,105 | ||||||
Property management fee revenue |
753 | 697 | ||||||
Other rental income |
496 | | ||||||
Total revenues |
148,436 | 153,748 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Property operating costs |
55,369 | 60,131 | ||||||
Depreciation |
26,080 | 25,630 | ||||||
Amortization |
11,387 | 13,442 | ||||||
General and administrative |
6,630 | 7,371 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
99,466 | 106,574 | ||||||
Real estate operating income |
48,970 | 47,174 | ||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||
Interest expense |
(19,091 | ) | (19,343 | ) | ||||
Interest and other income |
969 | 662 | ||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures |
737 | 663 | ||||||
Total other income (expense) |
(17,385 | ) | (18,018 | ) | ||||
Net income |
31,585 | 29,156 | ||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
(125 | ) | (118 | ) | ||||
Net income attributable to Piedmont |
$ | 31,460 | $ | 29,038 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted |
165,200 | 159,878 | ||||||
Net income per share available to common stockholders - basic and diluted |
$ | 0.19 | $ | 0.18 | ||||
2
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Funds From Operations, Core Funds From Operations and Adjusted Funds From Operations
Unaudited (in thousands except for per share data)
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net income attributable to Piedmont |
$ | 31,460 | $ | 29,038 | ||||
Add: |
||||||||
Depreciation of real estate assets (1) |
26,250 | 25,837 | ||||||
Amortization of lease-related costs (1) |
11,488 | 13,543 | ||||||
Funds from operations* and core funds from operations* |
69,198 | 68,418 | ||||||
Add: |
||||||||
Deferred financing cost amortization |
696 | 708 | ||||||
Depreciation of non real estate assets |
178 | 152 | ||||||
Straight-line effects of lease (revenue)/expense (1) |
1,073 | 2,696 | ||||||
Stock-based and other non-cash compensation |
653 | 1,005 | ||||||
Substract: |
||||||||
Net effect of amortization of above/(below)-market in-place lease intangibles (1) |
(1,426 | ) | (1,230 | ) | ||||
Income from amortization of discount on purchase of mezzanine loans |
(668 | ) | (367 | ) | ||||
Non-incremental capital expenditures (2) |
(9,122 | ) | (11,805 | ) | ||||
Adjusted funds from operations* |
$ | 60,582 | $ | 59,577 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted |
165,200 | 159,878 | ||||||
Funds from operations* and core funds from operations* per share (diluted) |
$ | 0.42 | $ | 0.43 | ||||
Adjusted funds from operations* per share (diluted) |
$ | 0.37 | $ | 0.37 |
(1) | Includes adjustments for wholly-owned properties, and for our proportionate ownership in unconsolidated joint ventures. |
(2) | Capital expenditures of a recurring nature related to tenant improvements and leasing commissions that do not incrementally enhance the underlying assets income generating capacity. We exclude first generation tenant improvements and leasing commissions from this measure |
*Definitions
Funds From Operations (FFO): FFO is calculated in accordance with the current National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) definition. NAREIT currently defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of property plus depreciation and amortization on real estate assets, and after the same adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Such factors can vary among owners of identical assets in similar conditions based on historical cost accounting and useful-life estimates. FFO may provide valuable comparisons of operating performance between periods and with other REITs. FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be viewed as an alternative measurement of our operating performance to net income. We believe that FFO is a beneficial indicator of the performance of an equity REIT. However, other REITs may not define FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition, or may interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do; therefore, our computation of FFO may not be comparable to that of such other REITs.
Core Funds From Operations (Core FFO): We calculate Core FFO by starting with FFO, as defined by NAREIT, and adjust for certain non-recurring items such as impairment losses and other extraordinary items. Such items create significant earnings volatility. We believe Core FFO provides a meaningful measure of our operating performance and more predictability regarding future earnings potential. Core FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be viewed as an alternative measurement of our operating performance to net income; therefore, it should not be compared to other REITs equivalent to Core FFO.
Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO): AFFO is calculated as Core FFO exclusive of the net effects of: (i) amortization associated with deferred financing costs; (ii) depreciation on non-income-producing real estate assets; (iii) straight line lease revenue/ expense; (iv) amortization of above and below-market lease intangibles; (v) stock-based and other non-cash compensation expense; (vi) amortization of mezzanine discount income; and (vii) non-incremental capital expenditures (as defined above). Our proportionate share of such adjustments related to investments in unconsolidated joint ventures are also included when calculating AFFO. Although AFFO may not be comparable to that of other REITs, we believe it provides a meaningful indicator of our ability to fund cash needs and to make cash distributions to equity owners. AFFO is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be viewed as an alternative measurement of our operating performance to net income, as an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities or as a measure of our liquidity.
3
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Same Store Net Operating Income
Unaudited (in thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net income attributable to Piedmont |
$ | 31,460 | $ | 29,038 | ||||
Add: |
||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
125 | 118 | ||||||
Interest Expense |
19,091 | 19,343 | ||||||
Depreciation |
26,428 | 25,989 | ||||||
Amortization |
11,488 | 13,543 | ||||||
Core EBITDA* |
88,592 | 88,031 | ||||||
Add: |
||||||||
General & administrative expenses |
6,695 | 7,407 | ||||||
Deduct: |
||||||||
Interest and other income |
(969 | ) | (662 | ) | ||||
Lease termination income |
(496 | ) | | |||||
Lease termination expense - straight line rent & FAS 141 write-offs |
67 | | ||||||
Core net operating income (Accrual basis)* |
93,889 | 94,776 | ||||||
Deduct: |
||||||||
Straight line rent adjustment |
1,006 | 2,696 | ||||||
FAS 141 adjustment |
(1,426 | ) | (1,230 | ) | ||||
Core net operating income (Cash basis)* |
93,469 | 96,242 | ||||||
Deduct: |
||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | ||||||
Industrial Properties |
(273 | ) | (641 | ) | ||||
Unconsolidated joint ventures |
(1,267 | ) | (1,196 | ) | ||||
Same Store NOI* |
$ | 91,929 | $ | 94,405 | ||||
Year over year change in same store NOI |
-2.6 | % | ||||||
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (Core EBITDA/ Interest Expense)(1) |
4.6 |
(1) | Piedmont had no capitalized interest, principal amortization or preferred dividends for any of the periods presented. |
*Definitions
Core EBITDA: Core EBITDA is defined as net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and incrementally adding back any impairment losses and other extraordinary items. We do not include impairment losses in this measure because we feel these types of losses create volatility in our earnings and make it difficult to determine the earnings generated by our ongoing business. We believe Core EBITDA is a reasonable measure of our liquidity. Core EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be viewed as an alternative measurement of cash flows from operating activities or liquidity. Other REITs may calculate Core EBITDA differently and our calculation should not be compared to that of other REITs.
Core Net Operating Income (Core NOI): Core NOI is defined as real estate operating income with the add-back of corporate general and administrative expense, depreciation and amortization, and casualty and impairment losses and the deduction of income and expense associated with lease terminations. We present this measure on a cash basis which eliminates the effects of straight lined rents and fair value lease revenue. The company uses this measure to assess its operating results and believes it is important in assessing operating performance. Core NOI is a non-GAAP measure which does not have any standard meaning prescribed by GAAP and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies.
Same Store NOI: Same Store NOI is calculated as the Core NOI attributable to the properties owned or placed in service during the entire span of the current and prior year. Same Store NOI excludes amounts attributable to industrial properties. We present this measure on a cash basis which eliminates the effects of straight lined rents and fair value lease revenue. We believe Same Store NOI is an important measure of comparison of our stabilized properties operating performance. Other REITs may calculate Same Store NOI differently and our calculation should not be compared to that of other REITs.
4
This news release was distributed by GlobeNewswire, www.globenewswire.com
SOURCE: Piedmont Office Realty Trust
CONTACT:
Piedmont Office Realty Trust
Eddie Guilbert
770-418-8592
research.analysts@piedmontreit.com
or
Investor Relations
800-557-4830
investor.services@piedmontreit.com
or
ICR Inc.
Evelyn Infurna
203-682-8346
Evelyn.infurna@icrinc.com
Exhibit 99.2
Quarterly Supplemental Information
March 31, 2010
Corporate Headquarters | Institutional Analyst Contact | Investor Relations | ||
11695 Johns Creek Parkway, Suite 350 | Telephone: 770.418.8592 | Telephone: 800.557.4830 | ||
Johns Creek, GA 30097 | research.analysts@piedmontreit.com | Facsimile: 770.243.8198 | ||
Telephone: 770.418.8800 | investor.services@piedmontreit.com | |||
www.piedmontreit.com |
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Quarterly Supplemental Information
Index
Page | ||
Introduction |
||
Corporate Data |
3 | |
Investor Information |
4 | |
Financial Highlights |
5-7 | |
Key Performance Indicators |
8 | |
Financials |
||
Balance Sheet |
9 | |
Income Statements |
10-11 | |
Funds From Operations / Adjusted Funds From Operations |
12 | |
Same Store Analysis |
13 | |
Capitalization Analysis |
14 | |
Debt Summary |
15 | |
Debt Detail |
16 | |
Debt Analysis |
17 | |
Operational & Portfolio Information - Office Investments |
||
Tenant Diversification |
18 | |
Tenant Credit & Lease Distribution Information |
19 | |
Leasing Activity |
20 | |
Lease Expiration Schedule |
21 | |
Annual Lease Expirations |
22 | |
Capital Expenditures & Commitments |
23 | |
Contractual Tenant Improvements & Leasing Commissions |
24 | |
Geographic Diversification |
25 | |
Industry Diversification |
26 | |
Other Investments |
||
Other Investments Detail |
27 | |
Supporting Information |
||
Definitions |
28-29 | |
Research Coverage |
30 | |
Non-GAAP Reconciliations |
31-33 | |
Risks, Uncertainties and Limitations |
34 |
Please refer to page 34 for a discussion of important risks related to the business of Piedmont Office Realty Trust, as well as an investment in its securities, including risks that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from results and events referred to in the forward-looking information. Considering these risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and limitations, the forward-looking events contained in this supplemental reporting package might not occur.
In the opinion of management, the statements for the unaudited interim periods presented include all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for such periods. Results for these interim periods are not necessarily indicative of a full years results and certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial statement presentation.
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Corporate Data
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (Piedmont or the Company) (NYSE: PDM) is a fully-integrated and self-managed real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in the acquisition, ownership, management, development and disposition of primarily high-quality Class A office buildings located predominately in large U.S. office markets and leased principally to high-credit-quality tenants. Since its first acquisition in 1998, the Company has acquired over $5.5 billion of office and industrial properties (inclusive of joint ventures). Rated as an investment-grade company by Standard & Poors and Moodys, Piedmont has maintained a low-leverage strategy while acquiring its properties. Over 87% of our Annualized Lease Revenue (ALR)(1) is derived from our office properties located within the ten largest U.S. office markets, including Chicago, Washington, D.C., the New York metropolitan area, Boston and greater Los Angeles.
This data supplements the information provided in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
As of March 31, 2010 |
As of December 31, 2009 |
|||||||
Number of properties (2) |
73 | 73 | ||||||
Rentable square footage (in 000s) (2) |
20,230 | 20,229 | ||||||
Percent Leased (3) |
89.6 | % | 90.1 | % | ||||
Capitalization (in 000s): |
||||||||
Total debt |
$ | 1,402,525 | $ | 1,516,525 | ||||
Equity market capitalization (4) |
$ | 3,424,469 | $ | N/A | ||||
Total market capitalization (4) |
$ | 4,826,994 | $ | N/A | ||||
Debt / Total market capitalization (4) |
29.1 | % | N/A | |||||
Common stock data |
||||||||
High closing price during quarter (4) |
$ | 20.20 | $ | N/A | ||||
Low closing price during quarter (4) |
$ | 15.60 | $ | N/A | ||||
Closing price of Class A common stock at period end (4) |
$ | 19.85 | $ | N/A | ||||
Weighted average fully diluted shares outstanding (in thousands) (5) |
165,200 | 158,581 | ||||||
Shares of common stock issued and outstanding |
172,517 | 158,917 | ||||||
Rating / outlook |
||||||||
Standard & Poors |
BBB / Stable | BBB / Stable | ||||||
Moodys |
Baa2 / Stable | Baa3 / Positive | ||||||
Employees |
107 | 107 |
(1) | The definition for Annualized Lease Revenue can be found on page 28. |
(2) | Our office portfolio currently consists of 73 properties (exclusive of our equity interests in eight properties owned through unconsolidated joint ventures and our two industrial properties). |
(3) | Calculated as leased square footage on March 31, 2010 plus square footage associated with new leases signed for currently vacant spaces divided by total rentable square footage, expressed as a percentage. This measure is presented for our 73 office properties and excludes industrial and unconsolidated joint venture properties. |
(4) | Our Class A common stock was listed on the New York Stock Exchange on February 10, 2010; there is no market data as of December 31, 2009. Our Class B-1, Class B-2, and Class B-3 common stock (collectively, our Class B common stock) is not listed on a national securities exchange and there is no established market for such shares. We have used the closing price of the Class A common stock at period end of $19.85 per share for the purposes of the calculations regarding market capitalization herein. |
(5) | Weighted average fully diluted shares outstanding are presented on a year-to-date basis for each period. |
3
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Investor Information
Corporate
11695 Johns Creek Parkway, Suite 350, Johns Creek, Georgia 30097
770.418.8800
www.piedmontreit.com
Executive and Senior Management
Donald A. Miller, CFA | Robert E. Bowers | Laura P. Moon | ||
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director |
Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer |
Chief Accounting Officer and Senior Vice President | ||
Raymond L. Owens | Carroll A. Reddic, IV | |||
Executive Vice President - Capital Markets | Executive Vice President - Real Estate Operations, Assistant Secretary |
|||
Board of Directors | ||||
W. Wayne Woody | Donald A. Miller, CFA | Frank C. McDowell | ||
Director and Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director |
Director and Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors | ||
Wesley E. Cantrell | Michael R. Buchanan | Donald S. Moss | ||
Director and Chairman of Governance Committee |
Director and Chairman of Capital Committee |
Director and Chairman of Compensation Committee | ||
Jeffery L. Swope | William H. Keogler, Jr. | |||
Director | Director |
Transfer Agent |
Corporate Counsel | |
Boston Financial Data Services | King & Spalding | |
2000 Crown Colony Drive | 1180 Peachtree Street, NE | |
Quincy, Massachusetts 02169 | Atlanta, GA 30309 | |
Phone: 888.772.2337 | Phone: 404.572.4600 |
4
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Financial Highlights
As of March 31, 2010
Financial Results (1)
| Funds from operations (FFO) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was $69.2M, or $0.42 per share (diluted), compared to $68.4M, or $0.43 per share (diluted), for the same quarter in 2009. The increase in FFO from 2009 to 2010 was primarily due to reduced general and administrative expenses due to lower compensation related costs as well as reduced taxes and license fees. The $0.01 decrease in FFO per share reflects the dilutive effect of the 13.8 million shares of Class A common stock issued in February 2010. |
| There were not any impairment charges or extraordinary items during the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009; therefore, core funds from operations (Core FFO) is the same as FFO. |
| Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was $60.6M, or $0.37 per share (diluted), compared to $59.6M, or $0.37 per share (diluted), for the same quarter in 2009. |
| During the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, the company paid to stockholders a quarterly dividend in the amount of $0.315 per share for all classes of common stock. The Company's dividend payout percentage for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 was 77.7% of Core FFO and 88.8% of AFFO, and 73.4% of Core FFO and 84.3% of AFFO, respectively. |
Operations
| On a square footage basis, our portfolio was 89.6% leased as of March 31, 2010 as compared to 90.1% and 91.1% at December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively. The decrease in leased square footage over the past year is primarily due to 133 thousand square feet being vacated in May 2009 by Countrywide in Phoenix and 99 thousand square feet in January 2010 by Kirkland & Ellis in Chicago. |
| The weighted average remaining lease term of our portfolio was 5.7 years( 2) as of March 31, 2010 as compared to 5.9 years and 5.2 years at December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively. |
| Only 6.8% of our Annualized Lease Revenue from our December 31, 2009 Quarterly Supplemental Information was set to expire in 2010 and a majority of this expiration takes place in the fourth quarter. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, leasing activity was modest with the company completing a total of over 354 thousand square feet of leasing. From an office leasing perspective, we executed renewal leases for 87 thousand square feet and new tenant leases for 94 thousand square feet, with an average committed capital cost of $1.56 and $2.37 per square foot per year of lease term, respectively. From an industrial leasing perspective, we executed new tenant leases totaling 174 thousand square feet with an average committed capital cost of $0.14 per square foot per year of lease term. |
| During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we retained tenants for 64% of the square footage associated with expiring leases, as compared to 78% for the year ended December 31, 2009. |
(1) | FFO, Core FFO and AFFO are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures. See pages 28-29 for definitions of non-GAAP financial measures. See pages 12 and 32 for reconciliations of FFO, Core FFO and AFFO to Net Income. |
(2) | Remaining lease term (after taking into account leases which had been executed but not commenced as of March 31, 2010) is weighted based on Annualized Lease Revenue, as defined on page 28. |
5
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Financial Highlights
As of March 31, 2010
| During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we executed two office leases greater than 20,000 SF. Please see information on those leases in the following chart. |
Tenant Name |
Property |
Property Location |
Square Feet Leased |
Expiration Year |
Lease Type | |||||
Internal Revenue Service | 5000 Corporate Court | Holtsville, NY | 101,178 | 2020 | Renewal / Expansion | |||||
New York Life Insurance Company | Fairway Center II | Brea, CA | 29,855 | 2016 | New |
Leasing Update
| During 2010 and 2011, five leases are scheduled to expire that contribute greater than 1% of Annualized Lease Revenue. Information regarding the leasing status of the spaces associated with those leases is as follows: |
Tenant Name |
Property |
Property Location |
Square Footage |
Percentage of Annualized Lease Revenue (%) |
Expiration (1) |
Leasing Status | ||||||
Citicorp | 111 Sylvan Avenue | Englewood Cliffs, NJ | 409,604 | 1.2% | Q4 2010 | Discussions with the current tenant for renewal of a portion of the space leased were terminated because the property is under contract to be sold in December 2010. Please see subsequent events on page 7. | ||||||
State Street Bank | 1200 Crown Colony Drive | Quincy, MA | 234,668 | 1.6% | Q1 2011 | In discussions with the current tenant for a renewal of the entire space leased by the tenant. | ||||||
U.S. Government, Comptroller of the Currency | One Independence Square | Washington, D.C. | 322,984 | 3.1% | Q2 2011 | In discussions with the current tenant for a renewal of the entire space leased by the tenant. | ||||||
Zurich American Insurance Company | Windy Point II | Schaumburg, IL | 300,034 | 1.8% | Q3 2011 | Space has been substantially sublet by the tenant. In discussions with sublessees for direct leases. | ||||||
Kirkland & Ellis | Aon Center | Chicago, IL | 331,887 | 1.8% | Q4 2011 | Kirkland & Ellis is vacating; 260,641 SF of the space associated with their lease has been relet to KPMG beginning in August 2012. |
(1) | The lease expiration date presented is that of the majority of the space leased to the tenant at the building. |
6
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Financial Highlights
As of March 31, 2010
Financing and Capital Activity
| As of March 31, 2010, our ratio of debt to total market capitalization was 29.1%; our ratio of debt to gross real estate assets was 30.7%; and our ratio of debt to total gross assets was 26.6%. |
| During the first quarter of 2010, the Company did not acquire or sell any properties. |
| On January 22, 2010, we filed an amendment to our charter to effect a recapitalization of our common stock as described further in our Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings. Upon the effectiveness of the recapitalization, each share of our outstanding common stock converted automatically into: (a) 1/12th of a share of our Class A common stock; plus (b) 1/12th of a share of our Class B-1 common stock; plus (c) 1/12th of a share of our Class B-2 common stock; plus (d) 1/12th of a share of our Class B-3 common stock. The recapitalization had the effect of a one-for-three reverse stock split. Prior period share and per share information in this report has been restated to reflect this recapitalization. |
| Our Class A common stock initially listed on the New York Stock Exchange on February 10, 2010. In connection with the listing, we issued approximately 13.8 million Class A common shares in an underwritten public offering. The shares were issued at a public offering price of $14.50 per share. Total net proceeds of $184.5 million were raised from the public offering; $114 million of the proceeds were used to pay down the outstanding balance on our $500 million revolving credit facility and the remainder is being used for general corporate purposes. |
| On February 17, 2010, the share redemption plan and the former dividend reinvestment plan were terminated. |
Subsequent Events
| On April 9, 2010, Moodys upgraded Piedmonts credit rating from Baa3 (with a Positive outlook) to Baa2 (with a Stable outlook). Moodys indicated that the reasons for the rating increase were the Companys conservative capital strategy, high-quality assets, diversified tenant base, high fixed charge coverage and solid liquidity. |
| On May 5, 2010, Piedmont entered into a binding contract to sell the 111 Sylvan Avenue property in Englewood Cliffs, NJ. As of that date, the purchaser had completed its due diligence study of the asset and its deposit of 10% of the agreed upon purchase price of $55 million became non-refundable. The transaction is scheduled to close in December 2010, which will allow Piedmont to recognize the cash flow of the existing lease with Citicorp through its expiration in November 2010. Piedmont will reclassify 111 Sylvan Avenue from real estate assets held-for-use to real estate assets held-for-sale as of May 5, 2010. We anticipate recording a $9.8 million impairment charge as a result of marking the asset to fair value on May 5, 2010. |
Guidance for 2010
| The following financial guidance for full-year 2010 is based on managements expectations at this time: |
Low | High | ||||||
Net Income (before the $9.8 million impairment charge) |
$ | 117 | - | 124 million | |||
Add: Depreciation & Amortization |
$ | 152 | - | 154 million | |||
Core Funds from Operations (excludes impairment charges) |
$ | 269 | - | 278 million | |||
Core Funds from Operations per diluted share (excludes impairment charges) |
$ | 1.56 | - | 1.62 |
Our anticipated $9.8 million charge on the 111 Sylvan Avenue property will not have an impact on our reported Core FFO, but it will impact FFO as previously estimated by roughly $0.055 per share. The opportunity to sell 111 Sylvan Avenue was not contemplated in our original FFO guidance. Note that individual quarters may fluctuate on both a cash and accrual basis due to timing of repairs and maintenance, capital expenditures and one-time revenue or expense events. In addition, the Companys guidance is based on information available to management as of the date of this release and does not include any future potential litigation reserve adjustments, or the impact of any potential acquisitions, divestitures or impairments.
7
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Key Performance Indicators
Unaudited (in thousands)
This section includes non-GAAP financial measures, including, but not limited to, Core Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation & Amortization (Core EBITDA), Funds from Operations (FFO), Core Funds from Operations (Core FFO) Adjusted Funds from Operations (AFFO), Same Store NOI, and NOI from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. Definitions of these non-GAAP measures are provided on pages 28-29 and reconciliations are provided on pages 31-33.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
Selected Operating Data |
3/31/2010 | 12/31/2009 | 9/30/2009 | 6/30/2009 | 3/31/2009 | |||||||||||||||
Percent leased (1) |
89.6 | % | 90.1 | % | 90.1 | % | 90.1 | % | 91.1 | % | ||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 112,106 | $ | 112,000 | $ | 112,874 | $ | 111,994 | $ | 112,946 | ||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 148,436 | $ | 151,017 | $ | 150,540 | $ | 149,579 | $ | 153,748 | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses (2) |
$ | 99,466 | $ | 106,788 | $ | 139,165 | $ | 103,990 | $ | 106,574 | ||||||||||
Lease termination income (3) |
$ | 496 | $ | 1,981 | $ | 0 | $ | 782 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
Impairment losses on real estate assets (4) |
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 37,633 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
Same Store NOI (5) (6) |
$ | 91,929 | $ | 87,850 | $ | 90,095 | $ | 90,019 | $ | 94,405 | ||||||||||
NOI from unconsolidated joint ventures |
$ | 1,267 | $ | 1,156 | $ | 1,171 | $ | 1,275 | $ | 1,196 | ||||||||||
Core EBITDA (5) |
$ | 88,592 | $ | 89,261 | $ | 90,266 | $ | 88,214 | $ | 88,031 | ||||||||||
Core FFO |
$ | 69,198 | $ | 69,484 | $ | 70,471 | $ | 68,546 | $ | 68,418 | ||||||||||
Core FFO per share - diluted |
$ | 0.42 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.43 | ||||||||||
AFFO (5) |
$ | 60,582 | $ | 47,709 | $ | 60,756 | $ | 59,303 | $ | 59,577 | ||||||||||
AFFO per share - diluted |
$ | 0.37 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.37 | ||||||||||
Gross dividends |
$ | 53,777 | $ | 49,733 | $ | 49,565 | $ | 49,389 | $ | 50,248 | ||||||||||
Dividends per share |
$ | 0.315 | $ | 0.315 | $ | 0.315 | $ | 0.315 | $ | 0.315 | ||||||||||
Selected Balance Sheet Data |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total real estate assets |
$ | 3,737,478 | $ | 3,763,527 | $ | 3,785,458 | $ | 3,850,625 | $ | 3,878,874 | ||||||||||
Total gross real estate assets |
$ | 4,571,837 | $ | 4,575,638 | $ | 4,601,835 | $ | 4,636,750 | $ | 4,631,104 | ||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 4,428,410 | $ | 4,395,345 | $ | 4,431,851 | $ | 4,494,484 | $ | 4,542,347 | ||||||||||
Net debt (7) |
$ | 1,325,531 | $ | 1,506,521 | $ | 1,515,186 | $ | 1,542,996 | $ | 1,483,120 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 1,584,781 | $ | 1,713,299 | $ | 1,743,415 | $ | 1,761,748 | $ | 1,722,981 | ||||||||||
Ratios |
||||||||||||||||||||
Core EBITDA margin (8) |
59.7 | % | 59.1 | % | 60.0 | % | 59.0 | % | 57.3 | % | ||||||||||
Fixed charge coverage ratio (9) |
4.6 | x | 4.6 | x | 4.6 | x | 4.5 | x | 4.6 | x | ||||||||||
Core FFO payout percentage (10) |
77.7 | % | 71.6 | % | 70.3 | % | 72.1 | % | 73.4 | % | ||||||||||
AFFO payout percentage (11) |
88.8 | % | 104.2 | % | 81.6 | % | 83.3 | % | 84.3 | % | ||||||||||
Net debt to core EBITDA (12) |
3.7 | x | 4.2 | x | 4.2 | x | 4.4 | x | 4.2 | x |
(1) | Percent leased represents 73 office properties and excludes industrial and unconsolidated joint venture properties. Percent leased decreased in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to the prior period primarily due to Countrywide vacating 133 thousand square feet at the end of their lease at our River Corporate Center building in Phoenix, AZ; it decreased in the first quarter of 2010 as compared to the prior period primarily due to Kirkland & Ellis vacating 99 thousand square feet at Aon Center in Chicago, IL. |
(2) | Total operating expenses in the third quarter of 2009 includes $35.1 million in impairment charges recognized on three wholly-owned assets. |
(3) | Lease termination income is included in other rental income on the income statement. |
(4) | Impairment losses include both wholly owned and unconsolidated joint ventures. |
(5) | Same Store NOI, Core EBITDA and AFFO have been adjusted to exclude impairments on real estate assets as shown on pages 31 and 32. |
(6) | The higher Same Store NOI during the first quarter of 2009 and 2010 is primarily the result of the uneven contractual rental payment schedule associated with the net lease of our 1901 Market Street building in Philadelphia, PA, which results in larger cash receipts by approximately $4 million during the first quarter of each year. |
(7) | Net debt is calculated as total debt minus cash and cash equivalents. |
(8) | Core EBITDA margin is calculated as Core EBITDA divided by total revenues. |
(9) | Fixed charge coverage is calculated as Core EBITDA divided by the sum of interest expense, principal amortization, capitalized interest and preferred dividends. We had no capitalized interest, principal amortization or preferred dividends during the three months ended March 31, 2010. |
(10) | Core FFO payout percentage is calculated as dividends paid during the applicable period divided by Core FFO. |
(11) | AFFO payout percentage is calculated as dividends paid during the applicable period divided by AFFO. |
(12) | Core EBITDA is annualized for the purposes of this calculation. |
8
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Unaudited (in thousands)
March 31, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
September 30, 2009 |
June 30, 2009 |
March 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate, at cost: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Land assets |
$ | 651,876 | $ | 651,876 | $ | 651,876 | $ | 659,637 | $ | 659,637 | ||||||||||
Buildings and improvements |
3,672,594 | 3,663,391 | 3,654,389 | 3,676,425 | 3,666,181 | |||||||||||||||
Buildings and improvements, accumulated depreciation |
(689,117 | ) | (665,068 | ) | (641,960 | ) | (615,665 | ) | (590,016 | ) | ||||||||||
Intangible lease asset |
235,022 | 243,312 | 280,087 | 284,292 | 284,292 | |||||||||||||||
Intangible lease asset, accumulated amortization |
(145,242 | ) | (147,043 | ) | (174,417 | ) | (170,460 | ) | (162,214 | ) | ||||||||||
Construction in progress |
12,345 | 17,059 | 15,483 | 16,396 | 20,994 | |||||||||||||||
Total real estate assets |
3,737,478 | 3,763,527 | 3,785,458 | 3,850,625 | 3,878,874 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
43,482 | 43,940 | 44,350 | 47,408 | 47,795 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
76,994 | 10,004 | 17,339 | 17,529 | 31,905 | |||||||||||||||
Tenant receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts |
33,152 | 33,071 | 38,819 | 32,105 | 38,331 | |||||||||||||||
Straight line rent receivable |
95,164 | 95,371 | 92,858 | 91,086 | 88,960 | |||||||||||||||
Notes receivable |
59,407 | 58,739 | 58,523 | 57,990 | 57,172 | |||||||||||||||
Due from unconsolidated joint ventures |
1,202 | 1,083 | 1,072 | 1,198 | 1,109 | |||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
18,600 | 21,456 | 22,220 | 20,448 | 14,827 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
180,097 | 180,097 | 180,097 | 180,097 | 180,097 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred financing costs, less accumulated amortization |
6,509 | 7,205 | 7,901 | 8,547 | 9,210 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred lease costs, less accumulated amortization |
176,325 | 180,852 | 183,214 | 187,451 | 194,067 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 4,428,410 | $ | 4,395,345 | $ | 4,431,851 | $ | 4,494,484 | $ | 4,542,347 | ||||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Lines of credit and notes payable |
$ | 1,402,525 | $ | 1,516,525 | $ | 1,532,525 | $ | 1,560,525 | $ | 1,515,025 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and accrued capital expenditures |
83,172 | 97,747 | 111,345 | 98,803 | 97,571 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income |
39,079 | 34,506 | 29,788 | 28,412 | 32,085 | |||||||||||||||
Intangible lease liabilities, less accumulated amortization |
57,689 | 60,655 | 64,082 | 67,143 | 70,169 | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap |
2,316 | 3,866 | 5,675 | 6,865 | 8,131 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,584,781 | 1,713,299 | 1,743,415 | 1,761,748 | 1,722,981 | |||||||||||||||
Redeemable common stock (1) |
| 75,164 | 61,716 | 52,230 | 136,926 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity (2): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Class A common stock |
534 | 397 | 395 | 394 | 402 | |||||||||||||||
Class B-1 common stock |
397 | 397 | 395 | 394 | 402 | |||||||||||||||
Class B-2 common stock |
397 | 397 | 396 | 394 | 402 | |||||||||||||||
Class B-3 common stock |
397 | 398 | 396 | 395 | 402 | |||||||||||||||
Additional paid in capital |
3,659,257 | 3,477,168 | 3,461,698 | 3,449,489 | 3,516,053 | |||||||||||||||
Cumulative distributions in excess of earnings |
(820,878 | ) | (798,561 | ) | (774,774 | ) | (716,949 | ) | (695,536 | ) | ||||||||||
Redeemable common stock (1) |
| (75,164 | ) | (61,716 | ) | (52,230 | ) | (136,926 | ) | |||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss |
(2,316 | ) | (3,866 | ) | (5,675 | ) | (6,865 | ) | (8,131 | ) | ||||||||||
Piedmont stockholders equity |
2,837,788 | 2,601,166 | 2,621,115 | 2,675,022 | 2,677,068 | |||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
5,841 | 5,716 | 5,605 | 5,484 | 5,372 | |||||||||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
2,843,629 | 2,606,882 | 2,626,720 | 2,680,506 | 2,682,440 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities, redeemable common stock and stockholders equity |
$ | 4,428,410 | $ | 4,395,345 | $ | 4,431,851 | $ | 4,494,484 | $ | 4,542,347 | ||||||||||
All classes of common stock outstanding at end of period (2) |
172,517 | 158,917 | 158,215 | 157,668 | 160,760 |
(1) | During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the board of directors terminated the share redemption plan. We are no longer required by GAAP to reclassify any of our common stock outstanding as redeemable common stock. |
(2) | During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we filed an amendment to our charter to effect a recapitalization of our common stock as described further in our SEC filings. Upon the effectiveness of the recapitalization, each share of our outstanding common stock converted automatically into: (a) 1/12th of a share of our Class A common stock; plus (b) 1/12th of a share of our Class B-1 common stock; plus (c) 1/12th of a share of our Class B-2 common stock; plus (d) 1/12th of a share of our Class B-3 common stock. The recapitalization had the effect of a one-for-three reverse stock split. Prior period share and per share information in this report has been restated to reflect this recapitalization. |
9
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
Unaudited (in thousands)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
3/31/2010 | 12/31/2009 | 9/30/2009 | 6/30/2009 | 3/31/2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 112,106 | $ | 112,000 | $ | 112,874 | $ | 111,994 | $ | 112,946 | ||||||||||
Tenant reimbursements |
35,081 | 36,108 | 36,924 | 36,059 | 40,105 | |||||||||||||||
Property management fee revenue |
753 | 928 | 742 | 744 | 697 | |||||||||||||||
Other rental income |
496 | 1,981 | | 782 | | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
148,436 | 151,017 | 150,540 | 149,579 | 153,748 | |||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Property operating costs |
55,369 | 57,301 | 57,618 | 55,639 | 60,131 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation |
26,080 | 27,090 | 26,792 | 26,561 | 25,630 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization |
11,387 | 16,171 | 13,991 | 13,695 | 13,442 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment loss on real estate assets |
| | 35,063 | | | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
6,630 | 6,226 | 5,701 | 8,095 | 7,371 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
99,466 | 106,788 | 139,165 | 103,990 | 106,574 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate operating income |
48,970 | 44,229 | 11,375 | 45,589 | 47,174 | |||||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(19,091 | ) | (19,489 | ) | (19,518 | ) | (19,393 | ) | (19,343 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest and other income |
969 | 652 | 1,989 | 1,147 | 662 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures |
737 | 673 | (1,985 | ) | 753 | 663 | ||||||||||||||
Total other income (expense) |
(17,385 | ) | (18,164 | ) | (19,514 | ) | (17,493 | ) | (18,018 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income |
31,585 | 26,065 | (8,139 | ) | 28,096 | 29,156 | ||||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
(125 | ) | (119 | ) | (121 | ) | (120 | ) | (118 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income attributable to Piedmont |
$ | 31,460 | $ | 25,946 | $ | (8,260 | ) | $ | 27,976 | $ | 29,038 | |||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted |
165,200 | 158,393 | 157,760 | 158,304 | 159,878 | |||||||||||||||
Net income per share available to common stockholders - basic and diluted |
$ | 0.19 | $ | 0.16 | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.18 | |||||||||
10
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
Unaudited (in thousands)
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
3/31/2010 | 3/31/2009 | Change | Change | ||||||||||||
Revenues: |
|||||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 112,106 | $ | 112,946 | $ | (840 | ) | -0.7 | % | ||||||
Tenant reimbursements |
35,081 | 40,105 | (5,024 | ) | -12.5 | % | |||||||||
Property management fee revenue |
753 | 697 | 56 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||
Other rental income |
496 | | 496 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||
Total revenues |
148,436 | 153,748 | (5,312 | ) | -3.5 | % | |||||||||
Operating expenses: |
|||||||||||||||
Property operating costs |
55,369 | 60,131 | 4,762 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||
Depreciation |
26,080 | 25,630 | (450 | ) | -1.8 | % | |||||||||
Amortization |
11,387 | 13,442 | 2,055 | 15.3 | % | ||||||||||
Impairment loss on real estate assets |
| | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||
General and administrative |
6,630 | 7,371 | 741 | 10.1 | % | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
99,466 | 106,574 | 7,108 | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||
Real estate operating income |
48,970 | 47,174 | 1,796 | 3.8 | % | ||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
|||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(19,091 | ) | (19,343 | ) | 252 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||
Interest and other income |
969 | 662 | 307 | 46.4 | % | ||||||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures |
737 | 663 | 74 | 11.2 | % | ||||||||||
Total other income (expense) |
(17,385 | ) | (18,018 | ) | 633 | 3.5 | % | ||||||||
Net income |
31,585 | 29,156 | 2,429 | 8.3 | % | ||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
(125 | ) | (118 | ) | (7 | ) | -5.9 | % | |||||||
Net income attributable to Piedmont |
$ | 31,460 | $ | 29,038 | $ | 2,422 | 8.3 | % | |||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted |
165,200 | 159,878 | |||||||||||||
Net income per share available to common stockholders - basic and diluted |
$ | 0.19 | $ | 0.18 | |||||||||||
11
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Funds From Operations, Core Funds From Operations and Adjusted Funds From Operations
Unaudited (in thousands except for per share data)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
3/31/2010 | 3/31/2009 | |||||||
Net income attributable to Piedmont |
$ | 31,460 | $ | 29,038 | ||||
Add: |
||||||||
Depreciation (1) (2) |
26,250 | 25,837 | ||||||
Amortization (1) |
11,488 | 13,543 | ||||||
Deduct: |
||||||||
Gain on sale of property (1) |
| | ||||||
Funds from operations |
69,198 | 68,418 | ||||||
Add: |
||||||||
Impairment loss on real estate assets (1) |
| | ||||||
Core funds from operations |
69,198 | 68,418 | ||||||
Add: |
||||||||
Depreciation of non real estate assets |
178 | 152 | ||||||
Stock-based and other non-cash compensation expense |
653 | 1,005 | ||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| | ||||||
Deferred financing cost amortization |
696 | 708 | ||||||
Deduct: |
||||||||
Straight-line effects of lease revenue (1) |
1,073 | 2,696 | ||||||
Amortization of lease-related intangibles (1) |
(1,426 | ) | (1,230 | ) | ||||
Income from amortization of discount on purchase of mezzanine loans |
(668 | ) | (367 | ) | ||||
Non-incremental capital expenditures (3) |
(9,122 | ) | (11,805 | ) | ||||
Adjusted funds from operations |
$ | 60,582 | $ | 59,577 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted |
165,200 | 159,878 | ||||||
Funds from operations per share (diluted) |
$ | 0.42 | $ | 0.43 | ||||
Core funds from operations per share (diluted) |
$ | 0.42 | $ | 0.43 | ||||
Adjusted funds from operations per share (diluted) |
$ | 0.37 | $ | 0.37 |
(1) | Includes adjustments for wholly-owned properties and for our proportionate ownership in unconsolidated joint ventures. |
(2) | Excludes depreciation of non real estate assets. |
(3) | Non-incremental capital expenditures are defined on page 29. |
12
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Same Store Net Operating Income
Unaudited (in thousands)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
3/31/2010 | 3/31/2009 | |||||||
Net income attributable to Piedmont |
$ | 31,460 | $ | 29,038 | ||||
Add: |
||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
125 | 118 | ||||||
Interest expense |
19,091 | 19,343 | ||||||
Depreciation |
26,428 | 25,989 | ||||||
Amortization |
11,488 | 13,543 | ||||||
Impairment loss on real estate assets |
| | ||||||
Core EBITDA |
88,592 | 88,031 | ||||||
Add: |
||||||||
General & administrative expenses (1) |
6,695 | 7,407 | ||||||
Deduct: |
||||||||
Interest and other income |
(969 | ) | (662 | ) | ||||
Lease termination income |
(496 | ) | | |||||
Lease termination expense - straight line rent & FAS 141 writeoffs |
67 | | ||||||
Core net operating income (accrual basis) |
93,889 | 94,776 | ||||||
Deduct: |
||||||||
Straight line rent adjustment |
1,006 | 2,696 | ||||||
FAS 141 adjustment |
(1,426 | ) | (1,230 | ) | ||||
Core net operating income (cash basis) |
93,469 | 96,242 | ||||||
Deduct: |
||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | ||||||
Industrial Properties |
(273 | ) | (641 | ) | ||||
Unconsolidated joint ventures |
(1,267 | ) | (1,196 | ) | ||||
Same Store NOI |
$ | 91,929 | $ | 94,405 | ||||
Change period over period |
-2.6 | % | N/A |
Same Store Net Operating Income
Top Seven Markets
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
3/31/2010 | 3/31/2009 | |||||||||
$ | % | $ | % | |||||||
Chicago (2) |
$ | 18,311 | 19.9 | $ | 21,071 | 22.3 | ||||
Washington, D.C. (3) |
19,511 | 21.2 | 18,565 | 19.7 | ||||||
New York (4) |
13,720 | 14.9 | 15,318 | 16.2 | ||||||
Minneapolis |
5,584 | 6.1 | 4,913 | 5.2 | ||||||
Los Angeles (5) |
5,321 | 5.8 | 6,057 | 6.4 | ||||||
Dallas |
4,090 | 4.4 | 4,107 | 4.4 | ||||||
Boston |
3,730 | 4.1 | 3,796 | 4.0 | ||||||
Other |
21,662 | 23.6 | 20,578 | 21.8 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 91,929 | 100.0 | $ | 94,405 | 100.0 | ||||
(1) | Includes general & administrative expenses associated with our unconsolidated joint venture assets. |
(2) | The decrease in Chicago Same Store Net Operating Income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 is primarily related to the previously announced 99 thousand square foot partial lease expiration with Kirkland & Ellis at Aon Center in Chicago, IL as well as a rental abatement concession associated with a lease renewal at Windy Point I in Schaumburg, IL. |
(3) | The increase in Washington, D.C. Same Store Net Operating Income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 is primarily related to contractual rental increases pursuant to existing leases and reduced property operating costs. |
(4) | The decrease in New York Same Store Net Operating Income for three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 is primarily related to a rental abatement associated with the lease restructure/extension with the State of New York at 60 Broad Street in New York, NY which reduced income during the first quarter of 2010 as compared to 2009 by approximately $1.5 million. |
(5) | The decrease in Los Angeles Same Store Net Operating Income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the previous period is due to a number of factors, including holdover rents recognized in 2009 for a lease that terminated in 2008 and a lease default by a bank that leased over 25 thousand square feet at our 1901 Main Street building in Irvine, CA. |
13
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Capitalization Analysis
Unaudited ($ and shares in thousands)
As of March 31, 2010 |
As of December 31, 2009 |
|||||||
Common stock price (1) |
$ | 19.85 | $ | N/A | ||||
Total shares outstanding (2) |
172,517 | 158,917 | ||||||
Class A common stock |
53,479 | 39,729 | ||||||
Class B-1 common stock |
39,679 | 39,729 | ||||||
Class B-2 common stock |
39,679 | 39,729 | ||||||
Class B-3 common stock |
39,679 | 39,729 | ||||||
Equity market capitalization (3) |
$ | 3,424,469 | $ | N/A | ||||
Total consolidated debt |
$ | 1,402,525 | $ | 1,516,525 | ||||
Total market capitalization (1) |
$ | 4,826,994 | $ | N/A | ||||
Total debt / Total market capitalization |
29.1 | % | N/A | |||||
Total gross real estate assets |
$ | 4,571,837 | $ | 4,575,638 | ||||
Total debt / Total gross real estate assets (4) |
30.7 | % | 33.1 | % | ||||
Total debt / Total gross assets (5) |
26.6 | % | 29.1 | % |
(1) | Reflects closing common stock price as of the end of the reporting period. The company was not listed on a public exchange as of December 31, 2009. Our Class A common stock initially listed on the New York Stock Exchange on February 10, 2010. |
(2) | On January 22, 2010, we filed an amendment to our charter to effect a recapitalization of our common stock as described further in our SEC filings. Upon the effectiveness of the recapitalization, each share of our outstanding common stock converted automatically into: (a) 1/12th of a share of our Class A common stock; plus (b) 1/12th of a share of our Class B-1 common stock; plus (c) 1/12th of a share of our Class B-2 common stock; plus (d) 1/12th of a share of our Class B-3 common stock. The recapitalization had the effect of a one-for-three reverse stock split. Prior period share and per share information in this report has been restated to reflect this recapitalization. |
(3) | Market value of common shares is defined as the total number of shares of all classes of our common stock outstanding multiplied by the closing price of our Class A common stock at the end of the reporting period, as further qualified in footnote (1) above. |
(4) | Total debt to total gross real estate assets ratio for the current period is defined as total debt divided by Piedmonts gross real estate assets. Gross real estate assets is defined as total real estate assets with the add back of accumulated depreciation and accumulated amortization related to real estate assets. |
(5) | Total debt to total gross assets ratio for the current period is defined as total debt divided by gross assets. Gross assets is defined as total assets with the add back of accumulated depreciation and accumulated amortization related to real estate assets. |
14
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Debt Summary
Unaudited ($ in thousands)
Floating Rate & Fixed Rate Debt
Debt (1) |
Amount | Weighted Average Interest Rate |
Weighted Average Maturity |
|||||||||||
Floating Rate |
$ | 0 | (2) | 0.0 | % | (3) | 29.0 months | |||||||
Fixed Rate (4) |
1,402,525 | 5.1 | % | 50.3 months | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,402,525 | 5.1 | % | 50.3 months | |||||||||
Unsecured & Secured Debt
Debt (1) |
Amount | Weighted Average Interest Rate |
Weighted Average Maturity |
|||||||||
Unsecured |
$ | 250,000 | 5.0 | % | 14.9 months | (4) | ||||||
Secured |
1,152,525 | 5.2 | % | 57.9 months | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,402,525 | 5.1 | % | 50.3 months | |||||||
Debt Maturities
Maturity Year |
Secured Debt (1) | Unsecured Debt (1) | Weighted Average Interest Rate |
Percentage of Total |
|||||||||
2010 |
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | N/A | N/A | |||||||
2011 |
0 | 250,000 | (4) | 5.0 | % | 17.8 | % | ||||||
2012 |
45,000 | 0 | (2) | 5.2 | % | 3.2 | % | ||||||
2013 |
0 | 0 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
2014 |
695,000 | 0 | 4.9 | % | 49.6 | % | |||||||
2015 |
105,000 | 0 | 5.3 | % | 7.5 | % | |||||||
2016 |
167,525 | 0 | 5.6 | % | 11.9 | % | |||||||
2017 |
140,000 | 0 | 5.8 | % | 10.0 | % | |||||||
TOTAL |
$ | 1,152,525 | $ | 250,000 | 5.1 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||
(1) | All of Piedmonts outstanding debt as of March 31, 2010 is interest-only debt. |
(2) | Amount represents the outstanding balance as of March 31, 2010 on the $500M Unsecured Line of Credit, which matures August 2011. Management intends to exercise the one-year extension option to extend the maturity date to August 2012. The payment of a 15 bp fee will be required to extend the term of this facility. |
(3) | Rate is equal to the weighted average interest on all outstanding draws as of March 31, 2010. Piedmont may select from multiple interest rate options with each draw, including the prime rate and various length LIBOR locks. All LIBOR selections are subject to an additional spread of .475% over the selected rate based on Piedmonts current credit rating. |
(4) | The $250 Million Unsecured Term Loan has a stated variable rate; however, Piedmont entered into an interest rate swap agreement which effectively fixes the interest rate on this loan at 4.97% through June 28, 2010. In January 2010, in connection with the notification of Piedmonts intent to extend the maturity of the loan by one year, Piedmont entered into four forward interest rate swap agreements with several counterparties to effectively fix the interest rate on the $250 Million Unsecured Term Loan at 2.36% during the one-year extension period. The $250 Million Unsecured Term Loan is, therefore, included in fixed rate debt. The $250M Unsecured Term Loan may be extended, upon payment of a 25 basis point fee, to June 2011. Piedmont gave notice in January 2010 of its intent to extend this facility to June 2011. It is, therefore, listed as a 2011 debt maturity. |
15
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Debt Detail
Unaudited ($ in thousands)
Facility |
Property |
Rate(1) | Maturity | Amount Outstanding as of March 31, 2010 | |||||||
Secured (Fixed) |
|||||||||||
$45.0 Million Fixed-Rate Loan |
4250 North Fairfax | 5.20 | % | 6/1/2012 | $ | 45,000 | |||||
35 West Wacker Building Mortgage Note |
35 West Wacker Drive | 5.10 | % | 1/1/2014 | 120,000 | ||||||
Aon Center Chicago Mortgage Note |
Aon Center | 4.87 | % | 5/1/2014 | 200,000 | ||||||
Aon Center Chicago Mortgage Note |
Aon Center | 5.70 | % | 5/1/2014 | 25,000 | ||||||
Secured Pooled Facility |
Nine Property Collateralized Pool (2) | 4.84 | % | 6/7/2014 | 350,000 | ||||||
$105.0 Million Fixed-Rate Loan |
US Bancorp Center | 5.29 | % | 5/11/2015 | 105,000 | ||||||
$125.0 Million Fixed-Rate Loan |
Four Property Collateralized Pool (3) | 5.50 | % | 4/1/2016 | 125,000 | ||||||
$42.5 Million Fixed-Rate Loan |
Las Colinas Corporate Center I & II | 5.70 | % | 10/11/2016 | 42,525 | ||||||
WDC Mortgage Notes |
1201 & 1225 Eye Street | 5.76 | % | 11/1/2017 | 140,000 | ||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average (4) |
5.16 | % | $ | 1,152,525 | |||||||
Unsecured (Variable) |
|||||||||||
$250 Million Unsecured Term Loan (5) |
N/A | LIBOR + 1.50 | %(5) | 6/28/2010 | (6) | $ | 250,000 | ||||
$500 Million Unsecured Facility (7) |
N/A | 0 | %(8) | 8/30/2011 | (9) | 0 | |||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average (4) |
4.97 | % | $ | 250,000 | |||||||
Total/ Weighted Average (4) |
5.13 | % | $ | 1,402,525 | |||||||
(1) | All of Piedmonts outstanding debt as of March 31, 2010 is interest-only debt. |
(2) | The nine property collateralized pool includes 1200 Crown Colony Drive, Braker Pointe III, 2 Gatehall Drive, One and Two Independence Square, 2120 West End Avenue, 111 Sylvan Avenue, 200 Bridgewater Crossing, and Fairway Center II. |
(3) | The four property collateralized pool includes 1430 Enclave Parkway, Windy Point I and II, and 1055 East Colorado Boulevard. |
(4) | Weighted average is based on the total balance outstanding and interest rate at March 31, 2010. |
(5) | The $250 Million Unsecured Term Loan has a stated variable rate; however, Piedmont entered into an interest rate swap agreement which effectively fixes the interest rate on this loan at 4.97% through June 28, 2010. In January 2010, in connection with the notification of Piedmonts intent to extend the maturity of the loan by one year, Piedmont entered into four forward interest rate swap agreements with several counterparties to effectively fix the interest rate on the $250 Million Unsecured Term Loan at 2.36% during the one-year extension period. |
(6) | Piedmont may extend the term for one additional year provided Piedmont is not then in default and upon the payment of a 25 basis point extension fee. In January 2010, Piedmont notified the administrative agent of its intent to extend the loan. |
(7) | All of Piedmonts outstanding debt as of March 31, 2010 is term debt with the exception of the $500 Million Unsecured Facility. |
(8) | Rate is equal to the weighted-average interest rate on all outstanding draws as of March 31, 2010. Piedmont may select from multiple interest rate options with each draw, including the prime rate and various length LIBOR locks. All LIBOR selections are subject to an additional spread (0.475% as of March 31, 2010) over the selected rate based on Piedmonts current credit rating. |
(9) | Piedmont may extend the term for one additional year provided Piedmont is not then in default and upon the payment of a 15 basis point extension fee. |
16
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Debt Analysis
As of March 31, 2010
Unaudited
Debt Covenant Compliance (1) |
Required | Actual | ||
Maximum Leverage Ratio |
0.60 | 0.28 | ||
Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (2) |
1.50 | 4.60 | ||
Maximum Secured Indebtedness Ratio |
0.40 | 0.23 | ||
Minimum Unencumbered Leverage Ratio |
1.60 | 9.32 | ||
Minimum Unencumbered Interest Coverage Ratio (3) |
1.75 | 10.55 | ||
Maximum Certain Permitted Investments Ratio (4) |
0.35 | 0.02 |
(1) | Debt covenant compliance calculations relate to specific calculations detailed in our term loan and line of credit agreements. |
(2) | Defined as EBITDA for the trailing four quarters (including the companys share of EBITDA from unconsolidated interests), less one-time or non-recurring gains or losses, less a $0.15 per square foot capital reserve, and excluding the impact of straight line rent leveling adjustments and amortization of intangibles divided by the companys share of fixed charges, as more particularly described in the credit agreements. |
(3) | Defined as net operating income for the trailing four quarters for unencumbered assets (including the companys share of net operating income from unconsolidated interests that are unencumbered) less a $0.15 per square foot capital reserve divided by the companys share of interest expense associated with unsecured financings only, as more particularly described in the credit agreements. |
(4) | Permitted investments are defined as unconsolidated interests, debt investments, unimproved land, and development projects. Investments in permitted investments shall not exceed 35% of total asset value. |
Other Debt Coverage Ratios |
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
Year ended December 31, 2009 | ||
Net debt / Core EBITDA |
3.7 x | 4.2 x | ||
Fixed charge coverage ratio (5) |
4.6 x | 4.6 x | ||
Interest coverage ratio (6) |
4.6 x | 4.6 x |
(5) | Fixed charge coverage is calculated as Core EBITDA divided by the sum of interest expense, principal amortization, capitalized interest and preferred dividends. We had no capitalized interest, principal amortization or preferred dividends during the period ending March 31, 2010. |
(6) | Interest coverage ratio is calculated as Core EBITDA divided by the sum of interest expense and capitalized interest. We had no capitalized interest during the period ending March 31, 2010. |
17
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Tenant Diversification
As of March 31, 2010
(in thousands)
Credit Rating (1) |
Number of Properties |
Lease Expiration(s) (2) |
Annualized Lease Revenue (3) |
Percentage of Annualized Lease Revenue (%) |
Leased Square Footage |
Percentage of Leased Square Footage (%) | |||||||||
U.S. Government |
AAA | 10 | (4) | $ | 75,597 | 13.0 | 1,684 | 9.3 | |||||||
BP Corporation |
AA | 1 | 2013 | 32,184 | 5.5 | 784 | 4.3 | ||||||||
Leo Burnett |
BBB+ | 2 | 2019 | 28,054 | 4.8 | 695 | 3.8 | ||||||||
US Bancorp |
A+ | 1 | 2014 | 22,002 | 3.8 | 715 | 4.0 | ||||||||
Nestle |
AA | 1 | 2015 | 18,695 | 3.2 | 480 | 2.7 | ||||||||
Winston & Strawn |
No rating available (5) | 1 | 2024 | 18,572 | 3.2 | 417 | 2.3 | ||||||||
State of New York |
AA | 1 | 2019 | 18,011 | 3.1 | 480 | 2.7 | ||||||||
Sanofi-aventis |
AA- | 2 | 2012 | 17,338 | 3.0 | 454 | 2.5 | ||||||||
Independence Blue Cross |
No rating available | 1 | 2023 | 14,897 | 2.6 | 761 | 4.2 | ||||||||
Kirkland & Ellis |
No rating available (5) | 1 | 2011 | 11,605 | 2.0 | 366 | 2.0 | ||||||||
Zurich American |
AA- | 1 | 2011 | 10,685 | 1.8 | 300 | 1.7 | ||||||||
Shaw |
BB+ | 1 | 2018 | 9,546 | 1.6 | 313 | 1.7 | ||||||||
State Street Bank |
AA- | 1 | 2011 | 9,414 | 1.6 | 235 | 1.3 | ||||||||
DDB Needham |
A- | 1 | 2018 | 8,829 | 1.5 | 244 | 1.3 | ||||||||
Lockheed Martin |
A- | 3 | 2014 | 8,796 | 1.5 | 284 | 1.6 | ||||||||
City of New York |
AA | 1 | 2020 | 7,677 | 1.3 | 270 | 1.5 | ||||||||
Citigroup |
A | 2 | 2010 | 7,555 | 1.3 | 415 | 2.3 | ||||||||
Gemini |
A+ | 1 | 2013 | 7,532 | 1.3 | 205 | 1.1 | ||||||||
Gallagher |
No rating available | 1 | 2018 | 6,995 | 1.2 | 307 | 1.7 | ||||||||
Caterpillar Financial |
A | 1 | 2022 | 6,975 | 1.2 | 312 | 1.7 | ||||||||
Other |
Various | 240,928 | 41.5 | 8,395 | 46.3 | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 581,887 | 100.0 | 18,116 | 100.0 | ||||||||||
(1) | Credit rating may reflect credit rating of parent or guarantor. |
(2) | Represents the expiration year of the majority of the square footage leased by the tenant. |
(3) | Please refer to page 28 for the definition of Annualized Lease Revenue. |
(4) | There are several leases with several different agencies of the U.S. Government with expiration years ranging from 2011 to 2025. |
(5) | While no ratings are available for Winston & Strawn and Kirkland & Ellis, these tenants are ranked #34 and #7, respectively, in the 2009 AmLaw 100 ranking (based on 2008 financial data), a publication of The American Lawyer Magazine, which annually ranks the top-grossing, most profitable law firms. |
18
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Credit Rating & Lease Distribution Information
As of March 31, 2010
(in thousands)
Tenant Credit Rating (1) |
Annualized Lease Revenue |
Percentage of Annualized Lease Revenue (%) | |||
AAA |
$ | 81,547 | 14.0 | ||
AA |
127,268 | 21.9 | |||
A |
95,593 | 16.4 | |||
BBB |
69,083 | 11.9 | |||
BB |
26,575 | 4.6 | |||
B |
16,699 | 2.9 | |||
Below |
1,401 | 0.2 | |||
Not rated |
163,721 | 28.1 | |||
Total |
$ | 581,887 | 100.0 | ||
Lease Distribution
As of March 31, 2010
Number of Leases |
Percentage of Leases (%) |
Annualized Lease Revenue ($s in thousands) |
Percentage of Annualized Lease Revenue (%) |
Leased Square Footage (in thousands) |
Percentage of Leased Square Footage (%) | ||||||||
2,500 or Less |
155 | 34.4 | $ | 12,549 | 2.2 | 118 | 0.6 | ||||||
2,501 - 10,000 |
119 | 26.5 | 22,222 | 3.8 | 617 | 3.4 | |||||||
10,001 - 20,000 |
45 | 10.0 | 20,841 | 3.6 | 649 | 3.6 | |||||||
20,001 - 40,000 |
45 | 10.0 | 38,576 | 6.6 | 1,243 | 6.9 | |||||||
40,001 - 100,000 |
32 | 7.1 | 61,648 | 10.6 | 2,019 | 11.1 | |||||||
Greater than 100,000 |
54 | 12.0 | 426,051 | 73.2 | 13,470 | 74.4 | |||||||
Total |
450 | 100.0 | $ | 581,887 | 100.0 | 18,116 | 100.0 | ||||||
(1) | Credit rating may reflect credit rating of parent or guarantor. |
19
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Office Leasing Activity
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 | ||||||||
Leased Square Footage |
Rentable Square Footage |
Percent Leased (1) | ||||||
As of December 31, 2009 |
18,221 | 20,229 | 90.1 | % | ||||
New Leases |
118 | |||||||
Expired Leases |
(223 | ) | ||||||
Other |
1 | |||||||
As of March 31, 2010 (2) |
18,116 | 20,230 | 89.6 | % | ||||
Rental Rate Roll Up / Roll Down Associated with New Leasing Activity (3)
Square Feet | % Change Cash Rents |
% Change Accrual Rents |
|||||||
For the three months ended March 31, 2010: |
|||||||||
New, renewal, and expansion leases executed |
116 | (21.0 | %) | (16.8 | %) | ||||
Percentage of Rentable Square Footage |
0.6 | % |
(1) | Calculated as leased square footage on March 31, 2010 plus square footage associated with new leases signed for currently vacant spaces divided by total rentable square footage, expressed as a percentage. |
(2) | The square footage associated with leases with end of period expiration dates is included in the end of the period leased square footage. |
(3) | The population analyzed consists of office leases executed during the quarter (retail leases as well as activity associated with our industrial properties and our unconsolidated joint venture assets were excluded from this analysis). For spaces that had been vacant for less than 1 year, the rents last in effect for the previous lease were compared to the initial rents of the new lease. Spaces that had been vacant for greater than 1 year were excluded from this analysis. |
20
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Lease Expiration Schedule
As of March 31, 2010
(in thousands)
OFFICE PORTFOLIO | GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES | |||||||||||||
Rentable Square Footage |
Percentage of Rentable Square Footage (%) |
Annualized Lease Revenue (1) |
Percentage of Annualized Lease Revenue (%) |
Annualized Lease Revenue (1) |
Percentage of Annualized Lease Revenue (%) | |||||||||
Vacant |
2,114 | 10.4 | $ | 0 | 0.0 | $ | 0 | 0.0 | ||||||
20102 |
1,169 | 5.8 | 32,178 | 5.5 | 1,864 | 0.3 | ||||||||
2011 |
2,306 | 11.4 | 73,398 | 12.6 | 19,157 | 3.3 | ||||||||
2012 |
2,218 | 11.0 | 81,204 | 14.0 | 36,629 | 6.3 | ||||||||
2013 |
1,877 | 9.3 | 66,914 | 11.5 | 1,294 | 0.2 | ||||||||
2014 |
1,748 | 8.6 | 54,366 | 9.3 | 3,601 | 0.6 | ||||||||
2015 |
1,406 | 7.0 | 42,123 | 7.2 | 0 | 0.0 | ||||||||
2016 |
1,023 | 5.1 | 28,601 | 4.9 | 1,029 | 0.2 | ||||||||
2017 |
432 | 2.1 | 15,590 | 2.7 | 1,248 | 0.2 | ||||||||
2018 |
1,455 | 7.2 | 43,422 | 7.5 | 8,604 | 1.5 | ||||||||
2019 |
1,409 | 7.0 | 53,018 | 9.1 | 17,913 | 3.1 | ||||||||
2020 |
939 | 4.6 | 25,811 | 4.5 | 8,955 | 1.5 | ||||||||
2021 |
140 | 0.7 | 3,666 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.0 | ||||||||
2022 |
317 | 1.5 | 7,765 | 1.3 | 0 | 0.0 | ||||||||
2023 |
761 | 3.8 | 14,897 | 2.6 | 0 | 0.0 | ||||||||
Thereafter |
916 | 4.5 | 38,934 | 6.7 | 1,323 | 0.2 | ||||||||
Total / Weighted |
20,230 | 100.0 | $ | 581,887 | 100.0 | $ | 101,617 | 17.4 | ||||||
(1) | Annualized lease revenue for purposes of this schedule includes the revenue effects of leases executed but not commenced as of March 31, 2010. |
(2) | Includes leases with an expiration date of March 31, 2010 aggregating 20,155 square feet and Annualized Lease Revenue of $555,165 for which no new leases were signed. |
21
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Annual Lease Expirations
As of March 31, 2010
(in thousands)
12/31/2010 | 12/31/2011 | 12/31/2012 | 12/31/2013 | |||||||||||||||||
Expiring Square Footage |
Expiring Lease Revenue (1) |
Expiring Square Footage |
Expiring Lease Revenue (1) |
Expiring Square Footage |
Expiring Lease Revenue (1) |
Expiring Square Footage |
Expiring Lease Revenue (1) | |||||||||||||
Atlanta |
57 | $ | 1,827 | 84 | $ | 2,019 | 34 | $ | 602 | 46 | $ | 1,068 | ||||||||
Austin |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Boston |
1 | 32 | 235 | 9,414 | 7 | 332 | 111 | 2,090 | ||||||||||||
Central & South Florida |
11 | 314 | 124 | 2,731 | 16 | 430 | 55 | 1,353 | ||||||||||||
Chicago |
141 | 5,803 | 407 | 13,782 | 42 | 1,569 | 851 | 32,890 | ||||||||||||
Cleveland |
0 | 0 | 22 | 477 | 112 | 1,915 | 14 | 332 | ||||||||||||
Dallas |
55 | 1,185 | 285 | 6,094 | 86 | 2,240 | 9 | 227 | ||||||||||||
Denver |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Detroit |
80 | 2,574 | 263 | 5,708 | 84 | 2,235 | 196 | 5,657 | ||||||||||||
Houston |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Los Angeles |
96 | 3,813 | 100 | 3,613 | 191 | 4,048 | 87 | 2,952 | ||||||||||||
Minneapolis |
8 | 300 | 145 | 4,610 | 20 | 713 | 44 | 1,386 | ||||||||||||
Nashville |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
New York |
446 | 8,231 | 6 | 304 | 621 | 21,354 | 232 | 8,567 | ||||||||||||
Philadelphia |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Phoenix |
91 | 1,861 | 45 | 790 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Portland |
73 | 1,305 | 105 | 1,502 | 73 | 1,279 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Seattle |
87 | 2,246 | 69 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Washington, D.C. |
23 | 2,219 | 416 | 22,541 | 932 | 44,426 | 232 | 10,125 | ||||||||||||
Total / Weighted Average |
1,169 | $ | 31,710 | 2,306 | $ | 75,357 | 2,218 | $ | 81,143 | 1,877 | $ | 66,647 | ||||||||
(1) | Expiring lease revenue is calculated as expiring square footage multiplied by the rent per square foot of the tenant currently leasing the space. |
22
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Capital Expenditures by Type
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010
Unaudited ($ in thousands)
For the Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | September 30, 2009 | June 30, 2009 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||
Non-incremental (1) |
|||||||||||||||
Bldg / construction / dev |
2,794 | 3,344 | $ | 852 | $ | 1,108 | $ | 1,256 | |||||||
Tenant improvements |
3,591 | 10,278 | 3,527 | 5,233 | 3,841 | ||||||||||
Leasing costs |
2,737 | 6,075 | 4,081 | 1,193 | 6,708 | ||||||||||
Total non-incremental |
9,122 | 19,697 | 8,460 | 7,534 | 11,805 | ||||||||||
Incremental (1) |
|||||||||||||||
Bldg / construction / dev |
277 | 2,023 | 838 | 551 | 526 | ||||||||||
Tenant improvements |
0 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
Leasing costs |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
Total incremental |
277 | 2,042 | 838 | 551 | 526 | ||||||||||
Total capital expenditures |
$ | 9,399 | $ | 21,739 | $ | 9,298 | $ | 8,085 | $ | 12,331 | |||||
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
||||
Tenant improvement commitments (2) |
||||
Tenant improvement commitments outstanding at beginning of period |
$ | 121,469 | ||
New tenant improvement commitments related to leases executed during period |
1,719 | |||
Tenant improvement commitments fulfilled or expired |
(4,293 | ) | ||
Total |
$ | 118,895 | ||
NOTE: The information presented on this page is for all consolidated assets, inclusive of our industrial properties.
(1) | Definitions for non-incremental and incremental capital expenditures can be found on pages 28 and 29. |
(2) | Commitments are unexpired contractual tenant improvement obligations for leases executed in current and prior periods that have not yet been fulfilled. The three largest commitments total approximately $72.2 million, or 61% of total outstanding commitments. |
23
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Contractual Tenant Improvements and Leasing Commissions
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
Renewal Leases |
||||||||||||
Number of leases |
6 | 34 | 34 | 39 | ||||||||
Square feet |
86,729 | 1,568,895 | 967,959 | 1,672,383 | ||||||||
Tenant improvements per square foot |
$ | 7.22 | $ | 12.01 | $ | 8.28 | $ | 13.19 | ||||
Leasing commissions per square foot |
$ | 4.78 | $ | 5.51 | $ | 7.17 | $ | 7.18 | ||||
Total per square foot |
$ | 12.00 | $ | 17.52 | $ | 15.45 | $ | 20.37 | ||||
Tenant improvements per square foot per year of lease term |
$ | 0.94 | $ | 1.44 | $ | 1.39 | $ | 1.85 | ||||
Leasing commissions per square foot per year of lease term |
$ | 0.62 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 1.20 | $ | 1.01 | ||||
Total per square foot per year of lease term |
$ | 1.56 | $ | 2.10 | $ | 2.59 | $ | 2.86 | ||||
New Leases |
||||||||||||
Number of leases |
4 | 28 | 37 | 44 | ||||||||
Square feet |
93,739 | 700,295 | 747,919 | 508,605 | ||||||||
Tenant improvements per square foot |
$ | 11.66 | $ | 45.04 | $ | 30.59 | $ | 24.93 | ||||
Leasing commissions per square foot |
$ | 8.36 | $ | 17.12 | $ | 15.95 | $ | 10.39 | ||||
Total per square foot |
$ | 20.02 | $ | 62.16 | $ | 46.54 | $ | 35.32 | ||||
Tenant improvements per square foot per year of lease term |
$ | 1.38 | $ | 4.05 | $ | 3.24 | $ | 3.29 | ||||
Leasing commissions per square foot per year of lease term |
$ | 0.99 | $ | 1.54 | $ | 1.69 | $ | 1.37 | ||||
Total per square foot per year of lease term |
$ | 2.37 | $ | 5.59 | $ | 4.93 | $ | 4.66 | ||||
Total |
||||||||||||
Number of leases |
10 | 62 | 71 | 83 | ||||||||
Square feet |
180,468 | 2,269,190 | 1,715,878 | 2,180,988 | ||||||||
Tenant improvements per square foot |
$ | 9.53 | $ | 22.21 | $ | 18.01 | $ | 15.93 | ||||
Leasing commissions per square foot |
$ | 6.64 | $ | 9.09 | $ | 11.00 | $ | 7.93 | ||||
Total per square foot |
$ | 16.17 | $ | 31.30 | $ | 29.01 | $ | 23.86 | ||||
Tenant improvements per square foot per year of lease term |
$ | 1.18 | $ | 2.42 | $ | 2.41 | $ | 2.21 | ||||
Leasing commissions per square foot per year of lease term |
$ | 0.82 | $ | 0.99 | $ | 1.47 | $ | 1.10 | ||||
Total per square foot per year of lease term |
$ | 2.00 | $ | 3.41 | $ | 3.88 | $ | 3.31 |
NOTE: This information is presented for our consolidated office assets only.
24
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Geographic Diversification
As of March 31, 2010
Location |
Number of Properties |
Rentable Square Footage (in Thousands) |
Percentage of Rentable Square Footage (%) |
Occupied Square Feet |
Percent Leased (%) |
Annualized Lease Revenue ($'s in thousands) |
Percentage of Annualized Lease Revenue (%) | ||||||||
Chicago |
6 | 4,884 | 24.1 | 4,286 | 87.8 | $ | 153,283 | 26.3 | |||||||
Washington, D.C. |
14 | 3,045 | 15.1 | 2,590 | 85.1 | 115,648 | 19.9 | ||||||||
New York |
9 | 3,288 | 16.3 | 3,078 | 93.6 | 94,493 | 16.2 | ||||||||
Minneapolis |
2 | 1,227 | 6.1 | 1,211 | 98.7 | 37,240 | 6.4 | ||||||||
Los Angeles |
5 | 1,133 | 5.6 | 981 | 86.6 | 34,638 | 6.0 | ||||||||
Dallas |
7 | 1,275 | 6.3 | 1,117 | 87.6 | 25,624 | 4.4 | ||||||||
Boston |
4 | 583 | 2.9 | 540 | 92.6 | 23,290 | 4.0 | ||||||||
Detroit |
4 | 929 | 4.6 | 757 | 81.5 | 20,210 | 3.5 | ||||||||
Philadelphia |
1 | 761 | 3.8 | 761 | 100.0 | 14,897 | 2.6 | ||||||||
Atlanta |
3 | 607 | 3.0 | 469 | 77.3 | 11,844 | 2.0 | ||||||||
Houston |
1 | 313 | 1.5 | 313 | 100.0 | 9,562 | 1.6 | ||||||||
Phoenix |
4 | 557 | 2.8 | 434 | 77.9 | 7,647 | 1.3 | ||||||||
Nashville |
1 | 312 | 1.5 | 312 | 100.0 | 6,975 | 1.2 | ||||||||
Central & South Florida |
3 | 297 | 1.4 | 260 | 87.5 | 5,872 | 1.0 | ||||||||
Austin |
1 | 195 | 0.9 | 195 | 100.0 | 5,668 | 1.0 | ||||||||
Portland |
4 | 325 | 1.6 | 325 | 100.0 | 5,109 | 0.9 | ||||||||
Seattle |
1 | 156 | 0.8 | 156 | 100.0 | 4,017 | 0.7 | ||||||||
Cleveland |
2 | 187 | 0.9 | 175 | 93.6 | 3,333 | 0.6 | ||||||||
Denver |
1 | 156 | 0.8 | 156 | 100.0 | 2,537 | 0.4 | ||||||||
Total / Weighted Average |
73 | 20,230 | 100.0 | 18,116 | 89.6 | $ | 581,887 | 100.0 | |||||||
25
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Industry Diversification
As of March 31, 2010
Industry Diversification |
Number of Tenants |
Percentage of Total Tenants (%) |
Annualized Lease Revenue ($s in thousands) |
Percentage of Annualized Lease Revenue (%) |
Leased Square Footage (in thousands) |
Percentage of Leased Square Footage (%) | |||||||
Governmental Entity |
20 | 4.9 | $ | 101,616 | 17.5 | 2,443 | 13.5 | ||||||
Business Services |
59 | 14.4 | 69,993 | 12.0 | 2,174 | 12.0 | |||||||
Depository Institutions |
16 | 3.9 | 55,829 | 9.6 | 1,856 | 10.2 | |||||||
Legal Services |
10 | 2.4 | 39,230 | 6.7 | 1,055 | 5.8 | |||||||
Insurance Carriers |
19 | 4.6 | 35,912 | 6.2 | 1,458 | 8.0 | |||||||
Petroleum Refining & Related Industries |
1 | 0.2 | 32,184 | 5.5 | 784 | 4.3 | |||||||
Chemicals & Allied Products |
8 | 1.9 | 24,753 | 4.3 | 741 | 4.1 | |||||||
Nondepository Credit Institutions |
10 | 2.4 | 21,494 | 3.7 | 827 | 4.6 | |||||||
Food & Kindred Products |
3 | 0.7 | 19,436 | 3.3 | 509 | 2.8 | |||||||
Engineering, Accounting, Research, Management & Related Services |
24 | 5.8 | 18,969 | 3.3 | 545 | 3.0 | |||||||
Communications |
35 | 8.5 | 17,332 | 3.0 | 607 | 3.4 | |||||||
Security & Commodity Brokers, Dealers, Exchanges & Services |
18 | 4.4 | 14,871 | 2.6 | 530 | 2.9 | |||||||
Electronic & Other Electrical Equipment & Components, Except Computer |
8 | 2.0 | 13,537 | 2.3 | 600 | 3.3 | |||||||
Educational Services |
9 | 2.2 | 12,060 | 2.1 | 285 | 1.6 | |||||||
Insurance Agents, Brokers & Services |
6 | 1.5 | 10,112 | 1.7 | 412 | 2.3 | |||||||
Other |
165 | 40.2 | 94,559 | 16.2 | 3,290 | 18.2 | |||||||
Total |
411 | 100.0 | $ | 581,887 | 100.0 | 18,116 | 100.0 | ||||||
26
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Other Investments
As of March 31, 2010
INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES |
Location |
Percent Ownership (%) |
Year Built | Real Estate Net Book Value ($s in thousands) |
Rentable Square Footage (in thousands) |
Percent Leased (%) | |||||||
112 Hidden Lake Circle |
Duncan, SC | 100 | 1987 | $ | 9,265 | 313.4 | 100.0 | ||||||
110 Hidden Lake Circle |
Duncan, SC | 100 | 1987 | 13,379 | 473.4 | 36.8 | |||||||
$ | 22,644 | 786.8 | 61.9 | ||||||||||
UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT |
Location |
Percent Ownership (%) |
Year Built | Piedmont Share of Real Estate Net Book Value ($s in thousands) |
Real Estate Net Book Value ($s in thousands) |
Rentable Square Footage (in thousands) |
Percent Leased (%) | |||||||||
14400 Hertz Quail Springs Parkway |
Oklahoma City, OK | 4 | 1997 | $ | 152 | $ | 4,123 | 57.2 | 100.0 | |||||||
360 Interlocken |
Broomfield, CO | 4 | 1996 | 240 | 6,506 | 51.7 | 27.9 | |||||||||
47300 Kato Road |
Fremont, CA | 78 | 1982 | 2,693 | 3,475 | 58.4 | 100.0 | |||||||||
20/20 Building |
Leawood, KS | 57 | 1992 | 2,720 | 4,791 | 68.2 | 90.8 | |||||||||
4685 Investment Drive |
Troy, MI | 55 | 2000 | 5,325 | 9,680 | 77.1 | 100.0 | |||||||||
5301 Maryland Way |
Brentwood, TN | 55 | 1989 | 11,294 | 20,530 | 201.2 | 100.0 | |||||||||
8560 Upland Drive |
Parker, CO | 72 | 2001 | 7,836 | 10,900 | 148.2 | 100.0 | |||||||||
Two Park Center |
Hoffman Estates, IL | 72 | 1999 | 11,941 | 16,610 | 193.7 | 83.0 | |||||||||
$ | 42,201 | $ | 76,615 | 855.7 | 91.1 | |||||||||||
LAND PARCELS |
Location |
Acres | ||
Portland Land Parcels |
Beaverton, OR | 18.2 | ||
Enclave Parkway |
Houston, TX | 4.5 | ||
Durham Avenue |
South Plainfield, NJ | 8.9 | ||
Corporate Court |
Holtsville, NY | 10.0 | ||
State Highway 161 |
Irving, TX | 4.5 | ||
Sylvan Avenue |
Englewood Cliffs, NJ | 2.4 | ||
48.5 | ||||
STRUCTURED FINANCE |
Location |
Book Value ($s in thousands) | |||
Mezzanine Loan (1) |
Chicago, IL | $ | 47,788 | ||
Mezzanine Loan (1) |
Chicago, IL | 11,619 | |||
$ | 59,407 | ||||
(1) | Secured by a pledge of the equity interest of the entity owning a 46-story, Class A commercial office building located in downtown Chicago. |
27
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Supplemental Definitions
Included in this section are management’s statements regarding certain non-GAAP financial measures provided in this supplemental package and reasons why management believes that these measures provide useful information to investors about the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures are presented on pages 31-33.
Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO): AFFO is calculated by deducting from Core FFO non-incremental capital expenditures and adding back non-cash items including non-real estate depreciation, straight lined rents and fair value lease revenue, non-cash components of interest expense and compensation expense, and by making similar adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Although AFFO may not be comparable to that of other REITs, we believe it provides a meaningful indicator of our ability to fund cash needs and to make cash distributions to equity owners. AFFO is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be viewed as an alternative measurement of our operating performance to net income, as an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities or as a measure of our liquidity.
Annualized Lease Revenue (ALR): ALR is calculated by multiplying (i) rental payments (defined as base rent plus operating expenses, if payable by the tenant on a monthly basis under the terms of a lease that have been executed, but excluding rental abatements and rental payments related to executed but not commenced leases for space that was covered by an existing lease), by (ii) 12. In instances in which contractual rents and operating expenses are collected on an annual, semi-annual, or quarterly basis, such amounts are multiplied by a factor of 1, 2, or 4, respectively, to calculate the annualized figure. For leases that have been executed but not commenced relating to un-leased space, ALR is calculated by multiplying (i) monthly base rental payments for the initial month of the lease term, by (ii) 12. Unless stated otherwise, this measure excludes our industrial properties and unconsolidated joint venture interests.
Core EBITDA: Core EBITDA is defined as net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and incrementally adding back any impairment losses and other extraordinary items. We do not include impairment losses in this measure because we feel these types of losses create volatility in our earnings and make it difficult to determine the earnings generated by our ongoing business. We believe Core EBITDA is a reasonable measure of our liquidity. Core EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be viewed as an alternative measurement of cash flows from operating activities or liquidity. Other REITs may calculate Core EBITDA differently and our calculation should not be compared to that of other REITs.
Core Funds From Operations (Core FFO): We calculate Core FFO by starting with FFO, as defined by NAREIT, and adjust for certain non-recurring items such as impairment losses and other extraordinary items. Such items create significant earnings volatility. We believe Core FFO provides a meaningful measure of our operating performance and more predictability regarding future earnings potential. Core FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be viewed as an alternative measurement of our operating performance to net income; therefore, it should not be compared to other REITs’ equivalent to Core FFO.
Core Net Operating Income (Core NOI): Core NOI is defined as real estate operating income with the add-back of corporate general and administrative expense, depreciation and amortization, and casualty and impairment losses and the deduction of income and expense associated with lease terminations. We present this measure on a cash basis which eliminates the effects of straight lined rents and fair value lease revenue. The company uses this measure to assess its operating results and believes it is important in assessing operating performance. Core NOI is a non-GAAP measure which does not have any standard meaning prescribed by GAAP and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies.
EBITDA: EBITDA is defined as net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. We believe EBITDA is an appropriate measure of our ability to incur and service debt. EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities, as a measure of our liquidity or as an alternative to net income as an indicator of our operating activities. Other REITs may calculate EBITDA differently and our calculation should not be compared to that of other REITs.
Funds From Operations (FFO): FFO is calculated in accordance with the current National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") definition. NAREIT currently defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of property, plus depreciation and amortization on real estate assets, and after the same adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Such factors can vary among owners of identical assets in similar conditions based on historical cost accounting and useful-life estimates. FFO may provide valuable comparisons of operating performance between periods and with other REITs. FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be viewed as an alternative measurement of our operating performance to net income. We believe that FFO is a beneficial indicator of the performance of an equity REIT. However, other REITs may not define FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition, or may interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do; therefore, our computation of FFO may not be comparable to that of such other REITs.
Incremental Capital Expenditures: Incremental Capital Expenditures are defined as capital expenditures of a non-recurring nature that incrementally enhance the underlying assets’ income generating capacity. Tenant improvements, leasing commissions, building capital and deferred lease incentives incurred to lease space that was dark at acquisition, improvements associated with the expansion of a building and renovations that change the underlying classification of a building are included in this measure.
28
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Supplemental Definitions
NOI from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures: NOI from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures is defined as Core NOI attributable to our interest in eight properties owned through unconsolidated partnerships. We present this measure on a cash basis which eliminates the effects of straight lined rents and fair value lease revenue. NOI from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures is a non-GAAP measure and therefore may not be comparable to similarly defined data provided by other REITs.
Non-Incremental Capital Expenditures: Non-Incremental Capital Expenditures are defined as capital expenditures of a recurring nature related to tenant improvements and leasing commissions that do not incrementally enhance the underlying assets’ income generating capacity. We exclude first generation tenant improvements and leasing commissions from this measure.
Same Store NOI: Same Store NOI is calculated as the Core NOI attributable to the properties owned or placed in service during the entire span of the current and prior year reporting periods. Same Store NOI excludes amounts attributable to industrial properties. We present this measure on a cash basis which eliminates the effects of straight lined rents and fair value lease revenue. We believe Same Store NOI is an important measure of comparison of our stabilized properties’ operating performance. Other REITs may calculate Same Store NOI differently and our calculation should not be compared to that of other REITs.
Same Store Properties: Same Store Properties is defined as properties owned or placed in service during the entire span of the current and prior two years of reporting periods. Same Store Properties excludes industrial properties. We believe Same Store Properties is an important measure of comparison of our stabilized portfolio performance.
29
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Research Coverage
Paul E. Adornato, CFA | Brendon Maiorana | |||
BMO Capital Markets | Wells Fargo | |||
3 Time Square | 7 St. Paul Street | |||
New York, New York 10036 | MAC R1230-011 | |||
Phone: (212) 885-4170 | Baltimore, MD 21202 | |||
Phone: (443) 263-6516 | ||||
Anthony Paolone, CFA | David B. Rodgers, CFA | |||
JP Morgan | RBC Capital Markets | |||
277 Park Avenue | Chagrin Highlands Center | |||
New York, NY 10172 | 2000 Auburn Drive, Suite 200 | |||
Phone: (212) 622-6682 | Beachwood, OH 44122 | |||
Phone: (440) 715-2647 |
30
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Same Store Net Operating Income
Unaudited (in thousands)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
3/31/2010 | 12/31/2009 | 9/30/2009 | 6/30/2009 | 3/31/2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Piedmont |
$ | 31,460 | $ | 25,946 | $ | (8,260 | ) | $ | 27,976 | $ | 29,038 | |||||||||
Add: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
125 | 119 | 121 | 120 | 118 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
19,091 | 19,489 | 19,518 | 19,393 | 19,343 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation |
26,428 | 27,434 | 27,159 | 26,928 | 25,989 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization |
11,488 | 16,273 | 14,095 | 13,797 | 13,543 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment loss on real estate assets |
| | 37,633 | | | |||||||||||||||
Core EBITDA |
88,592 | 89,261 | 90,266 | 88,214 | 88,031 | |||||||||||||||
Add: |
||||||||||||||||||||
General & administrative expenses |
6,695 | 6,296 | 5,757 | 8,102 | 7,407 | |||||||||||||||
Deduct: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
(969 | ) | (652 | ) | (1,989 | ) | (1,147 | ) | (662 | ) | ||||||||||
Lease termination income |
(496 | ) | (1,982 | ) | | (782 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Lease termination expensestraight line rent & FAS 141 writeoffs |
67 | 552 | 627 | 174 | | |||||||||||||||
Core net operating income (accrual basis) |
93,889 | 93,475 | 94,661 | 94,561 | 94,776 | |||||||||||||||
Deduct: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Straight line rent adjustment |
1,006 | (2,619 | ) | (1,508 | ) | (1,378 | ) | 2,696 | ||||||||||||
FAS 141 adjustment |
(1,426 | ) | (1,212 | ) | (1,249 | ) | (1,247 | ) | (1,230 | ) | ||||||||||
Core net operating income (cash basis) |
93,469 | 89,644 | 91,904 | 91,936 | 96,242 | |||||||||||||||
Deduct: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Industrial Properties |
(273 | ) | (638 | ) | (638 | ) | (642 | ) | (641 | ) | ||||||||||
Unconsolidated joint ventures |
(1,267 | ) | (1,156 | ) | (1,171 | ) | (1,275 | ) | (1,196 | ) | ||||||||||
Same Store NOI |
$ | 91,929 | $ | 87,850 | $ | 90,095 | $ | 90,019 | $ | 94,405 | ||||||||||
31
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Net Income/ FFO/ Core FFO/ AFFO Reconciliations
Unaudited (in thousands)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
3/31/10 | 12/31/2009 | 9/30/2009 | 6/30/2009 | 3/31/2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 112,106 | $ | 112,000 | $ | 112,874 | $ | 111,994 | $ | 112,946 | ||||||||||
Tenant reimbursements |
35,081 | 36,108 | 36,924 | 36,059 | 40,105 | |||||||||||||||
Property mgmt fees |
753 | 928 | 742 | 744 | 697 | |||||||||||||||
Other rental income |
496 | 1,981 | 0 | 782 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Gain on sale |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
148,436 | 151,017 | 150,540 | 149,579 | 153,748 | |||||||||||||||
Property operating expense |
55,369 | 57,301 | 57,618 | 55,639 | 60,131 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation |
26,080 | 27,090 | 26,792 | 26,561 | 25,630 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization |
11,387 | 16,171 | 13,991 | 13,695 | 13,442 | |||||||||||||||
Casualty & impairment loss |
0 | 0 | 35,063 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
General & administrative expense |
6,630 | 6,226 | 5,701 | 8,095 | 7,371 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
99,466 | 106,788 | 139,165 | 103,990 | 106,574 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate operating income |
48,970 | 44,229 | 11,375 | 45,589 | 47,174 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(19,091 | ) | (19,489 | ) | (19,518 | ) | (19,393 | ) | (19,343 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest and other income |
969 | 652 | 1,989 | 1,147 | 662 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated JVs |
737 | 673 | (1,985 | ) | 753 | 663 | ||||||||||||||
Total other income/(expense) |
(17,385 | ) | (18,164 | ) | (19,514 | ) | (17,493 | ) | (18,018 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income/ (loss) |
31,585 | 26,065 | (8,139 | ) | 28,096 | 29,156 | ||||||||||||||
Less: net income from non-controlling interest |
(125 | ) | (119 | ) | (121 | ) | (120 | ) | (118 | ) | ||||||||||
NET INCOME/ (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO PIEDMONT |
$ | 31,460 | $ | 25,946 | ($ | 8,260 | ) | $ | 27,976 | $ | 29,038 | |||||||||
Add Back: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation |
26,250 | 27,264 | 27,004 | 26,773 | 25,837 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization |
11,488 | 16,274 | 14,094 | 13,797 | 13,543 | |||||||||||||||
Deduct: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gain / (loss) on sale of property |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS (FFO) |
$ | 69,198 | $ | 69,484 | $ | 32,838 | $ | 68,546 | $ | 68,418 | ||||||||||
Add Back: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Casualty & impairment loss |
0 | 0 | 37,633 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
CORE FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS |
$ | 69,198 | $ | 69,484 | $ | 70,471 | $ | 68,546 | $ | 68,418 | ||||||||||
Add Back: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation of non real estate assets |
178 | 171 | 155 | 154 | 152 | |||||||||||||||
Straight-line effects of lease revenue |
1,073 | (1,619 | ) | (846 | ) | (1,228 | ) | 2,696 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of lease related intangibles |
(1,426 | ) | (1,663 | ) | (1,283 | ) | (1,223 | ) | (1,230 | ) | ||||||||||
Stock-based and other non-cash compensation expense |
653 | 671 | 671 | 831 | 1,005 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred financing cost amortization |
696 | 696 | 696 | 686 | 708 | |||||||||||||||
Income from amortization of discount on purchase of mezzanine loans |
(668 | ) | (334 | ) | (648 | ) | (929 | ) | (367 | ) | ||||||||||
Deduct: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-incremental capital expenditures |
(9,122 | ) | (19,697 | ) | (8,460 | ) | (7,534 | ) | (11,805 | ) | ||||||||||
ADJUSTED FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS |
$ | 60,582 | $ | 47,709 | $ | 60,756 | $ | 59,303 | $ | 59,577 | ||||||||||
32
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Unconsolidated Joint Venture NOI Reconciliation
Pro-rata (in thousands)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
3/31/2010 | 12/31/2009 | 9/30/2009 | 6/30/2009 | 3/31/2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Equity in Income of Unconsolidated JVs |
$ | 737 | $ | 673 | $ | (1,985 | ) | $ | 753 | $ | 663 | |||||||||
Add: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation |
348 | 344 | 367 | 367 | 359 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization |
101 | 102 | 104 | 102 | 101 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment Charge |
| | 2,570 | | | |||||||||||||||
Core EBITDA |
1,186 | 1,119 | 1,056 | 1,222 | 1,123 | |||||||||||||||
Add: |
||||||||||||||||||||
General & administrative expenses |
65 | 70 | 56 | 7 | 36 | |||||||||||||||
Deduct: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Core net operating income (accrual basis) |
1,251 | 1,189 | 1,112 | 1,229 | 1,159 | |||||||||||||||
Straight line rent adjustment |
17 | (32 | ) | 60 | 47 | 38 | ||||||||||||||
FAS 141 adjustment |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Core net operating income (cash basis) |
$ | 1,267 | $ | 1,156 | $ | 1,171 | $ | 1,275 | $ | 1,196 | ||||||||||
33
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Supplemental Operating & Financial Data
Risks, Uncertainties and Limitations
Certain statements contained in this supplemental package constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). We intend for all such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, as applicable. Such information is subject to certain risks and uncertainties, as well as known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Therefore, such statements are not intended to be a guarantee of our performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will, expect, intend, anticipate, believe, continue or similar words or phrases that are predictions of future events or trends and which do not relate solely to historical matters.
The following are some of the factors that could cause the Companys actual results and its expectations to differ materially from those described in the Companys forward-looking statements: the Companys ability to successfully identify and consummate suitable acquisitions; current adverse market and economic conditions; lease terminations or lease defaults, particularly by one of the Companys large lead tenants; the impact of competition on the Companys efforts to renew existing leases or re-let space; changes in the economies and other conditions of the office market in general and of the specific markets in which the Company operates; economic and regulatory changes; additional risks and costs associated with directly managing properties occupied by government tenants; adverse market and economic conditions and related impairments to the Company's real estate assets and other intangible assets; the success of the Companys real estate strategies and investment objectives; availability of financing; costs of complying with governmental laws and regulations; uncertainties associated with environmental and other regulatory matters; the Companys ability to continue to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code; and other factors detailed in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this supplemental report. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements contained in this supplemental report, and we do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
34