Table of Contents
FILED PURSUANT TO        
RULE 424 (B) (3)            
REGISTRATION NO: 333-85848
 
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
SUPPLEMENT NO. 13 DATED DECEMBER 11, 2003 TO THE PROSPECTUS
DATED JULY 26, 2002
 
This document supplements, and should be read in conjunction with, the prospectus of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. dated July 26, 2002, as supplemented and amended by Supplement No. 1 dated August 14, 2002, Supplement No. 2 dated August 29, 2002, Supplement No. 3 dated October 25, 2002, Supplement No. 4 dated December 10, 2002, Supplement No. 5 dated January 15, 2003, Supplement No. 6 dated April 14, 2003, Supplement No. 7 dated May 15, 2003, Supplement No. 8 dated June 15, 2003, Supplement No. 9 dated August 27, 2003, Supplement No. 10 dated September 15, 2003, Supplement No. 11 dated September 25, 2003, and Supplement No. 12 dated October 25, 2003. When we refer to the “prospectus” in this supplement, we are also referring to any and all supplements to the prospectus. Unless otherwise defined in this supplement, capitalized terms used in this supplement shall have the same meanings as set forth in the prospectus.
 
The purpose of this supplement is to describe the following:
 
 	(1)	Status of the offering of shares in Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (Wells REIT);	
 
 	(2)	Revisions to the “Plan of Distribution” section of the prospectus;	
 
 	(3)	Revisions to the “Description of Real Estate Investments” section of the prospectus to describe the following acquisitions;	
 
 	(A)	Acquisition of a partnership interest in an entity which owns a 50-story office building in Chicago, Illinois (Leo Burnett Chicago Building);	
 
 	(B)	Acquisition of all of the outstanding common stock of a real estate investment trust (Washington Properties REIT), which owns interests in three office buildings in the Washington, DC area (Washington, DC REIT Buildings); and	
 
 	(C)	Acquisition of all of the membership interest in a limited liability company which owns a 14-story office building in Arlington, Virginia (4250 North Fairfax Arlington Building);	
 
 	(4)	Revisions to the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section of the prospectus;	
 
 	(5)	Unaudited financial statements of the Wells REIT for the period ended September 30, 2003; and	
 
 	(6)	Unaudited pro forma financial statements of the Wells REIT reflecting the acquisitions of interests in the Leo Burnett Chicago Building, and the 4250 North Fairfax Arlington Building, and the common stock of the Washington Properties REIT.	
 
Status of the Offering
 
We commenced our initial public offering of common stock on January 30, 1998, which terminated on December 19, 1999, our second public offering of common stock on December 20, 1999, which terminated on December 19, 2000, and our third public offering of common stock on December 20, 2000, which terminated on July 26, 2002. We received approximately $1.59 billion in aggregate gross offering proceeds from the sale of approximately 159.0 million shares in these three prior public offerings.
 
1

Table of Contents
Pursuant to the prospectus, we commenced our fourth public offering of $3 billion in shares (300 million shares) of common stock on July 26, 2002. As of December 8, 2003, we had received aggregate gross offering proceeds of approximately $4.5 billion from the sale of approximately 453.5 million shares in all of our public offerings. After payment of approximately $156.5 million in acquisition and advisory fees and acquisition expenses, payment of approximately $486.0 million in selling commissions and organization and offering expenses, and aggregate common stock redemptions of approximately $64.4 million pursuant to our share redemption program, as of December 8, 2003, we had raised aggregate net offering proceeds available for investment in properties of approximately $3.8 billion out of which approximately $3.6 billion had been invested in real estate properties, and approximately $223.2 million remained available for investment in real estate properties.
 
As of December 11 2003, there were no shares remaining available for sale to the public under our fourth public offering, exclusive of (1) shares available for sale to current stockholders of the Wells REIT pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan, and (2) shares reserved to complete requests for transfer of asset transactions which were received on or before November 21, 2003.
 
Plan of Distribution
 
The following information should be read in conjunction with the “Plan of Distribution - General” section beginning on page 146 of the prospectus.
 
Of the maximum 300 million shares offered for sale to the public pursuant to our fourth public offering, there are no remaining shares available for sale to the public, exclusive of the approximately 3.6 million shares reserved to complete requests for transfer of asset transactions received by us on or before November 21, 2003. Of the maximum 30 million shares offered for sale pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan, as of December 11, 2003, approximately 11.8 million shares had been sold and approximately 18.2 million shares remained available to be sold to our current stockholders through our dividend reinvestment plan. We intend to continue to offer the remaining shares available pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan until the earlier of (1) the date of sale of all 30 million shares, or (2) the termination of this offering on July 25, 2004.
 
Description of Real Estate Investments
 
As of December 10, 2003, we had purchased and own interests in 102 real estate properties located in 26 states, exclusive of properties sold. Below is a description of our recent real property acquisitions.
 
Acquisition of Leo Burnett Chicago Building
 
On November 6, 2003, Wells 35 W. Wacker, LLC, a single member Delaware limited liability company wholly owned by Wells Operating Partnership, L.P. (Wells OP), a Delaware limited partnership formed to acquire, own, lease and operate real properties on behalf of the Wells REIT, purchased a 97.9396% general partnership interest in VV City-Buck Venture, L.P. (VV City), a Delaware limited partnership, which is the owner of a 96.5007% general partnership interest in 35 W. Wacker Venture, L.P. (Wacker Venture), which owns a 50-story office building containing approximately 1.1 million aggregate rentable square feet at 35 W. Wacker Drive in Chicago, Illinois (Leo Burnett Chicago Building), for a purchase price of approximately $267.5 million, plus closing costs. As a result of this two-tier partnership structure, Wells OP indirectly acquired a 94.5124% interest in the Leo Burnett Chicago Building. Wells OP received a credit against the purchase price paid at closing in the amount of approximately $139.3 million representing Wells OP’s pro rata portion of the existing first mortgage loan against the Leo Burnett Chicago Building in the amount of approximately $147.4 million. Buck 35 Wacker, L.L.C. (Buck) retained a 2.0604% limited partnership interest in VV City, and Leo Burnett USA, Inc. (Leo Burnett) retained a 3.4993% limited partnership interest in Wacker Venture. The partnership interest in VV City was purchased from VV USA City, L.P. (VV USA), a Delaware limited partnership. VV USA, Buck, and Leo Burnett are not in any way affiliated with the Wells REIT, Wells OP or Wells Capital, Inc., our advisor (Advisor).
 
2

Table of Contents
The existing indebtedness secured by a first mortgage loan against the Leo Burnett Chicago Building is in favor of New York Life Insurance Company and Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, bears interest at the rate of 7.25% per annum, requires monthly payments of principal and interest in the amount of approximately $1.2 million, and matures on March 1, 2006.
 
In exchange for certain concessions given as part of this transaction, Wells OP entered into an amendment to the current partnership agreement of Wacker Venture to extend and modify certain restrictions contained in the partnership agreement relating to a future sale or refinance of the Leo Burnett Chicago Building prior to December 31, 2012. In addition, Wells OP agreed to guarantee certain tax indemnification payments required to be made to compensate Leo Burnett from adverse tax consequences resulting from a future sale or refinancing of the Leo Burnett Chicago Building. As a result, unless Wells OP obtains the prior consent of Leo Burnett to the transaction, Wells OP will be required to make a tax indemnity payment to Leo Burnett upon any sale or refinancing of the Leo Burnett Chicago Building prior to December 2012 which will result in an adverse tax impact on Leo Burnett. The maximum potential liability to Wells OP of such tax indemnification obligation is $6.5 million, which decreases over time to $1.0 million in 2012. In addition, at closing, Wells OP amended the partnership agreement of VV City to change the name of VV City to Wells-Buck Venture, L.P.
 
The Leo Burnett Chicago Building, which was built in 1989, is primarily leased under net leases (i.e., operating costs and maintenance costs are paid by the tenants) to Leo Burnett and Winston & Strawn LLP, which together lease approximately 89% of the Leo Burnett Chicago Building. Various other tenants lease an additional approximately 9% of the Leo Burnett Chicago Building, and approximately 2% of the Leo Burnett Chicago Building is currently vacant.
 
Leo Burnett is a worldwide advertising company with U.S. corporate headquarters in Chicago, Illinois. Leo Burnett operates 98 different full service advertising agencies in 85 countries worldwide. It also operates several specialized agencies and marketing services. Leo Burnett is a subsidiary of Publicis Group S.A. (Publicis), a French company with corporate headquarters in Paris. The current annual base rent payable under the Leo Burnett lease, which expires in 2012, is approximately $10.6 million. Leo Burnett has the right, at its option, to extend the initial term of its lease for four additional five-year periods at 95% of the then-current market rental rate. In addition, Leo Burnett has expansion options and a right of first refusal to lease additional space in the Leo Burnett Chicago Building. Further, Leo Burnett has certain limited rental space contraction options in 2005 and 2010, subject to certain restrictions.
 
Winston and Strawn LLP is a full-service law firm with offices in Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Washington, Geneva, London and Paris. Winston & Strawn LLP’s practice areas include litigation, corporate, employment, real estate, tax, intellectual property and environmental law. Winston & Strawn LLP has approximately 900 attorneys. The current annual base rent payable under the Winston & Strawn LLP lease, which expires in 2009, is approximately $10.0 million. Winston & Strawn LLP has the right, at its option, to extend the initial term of its lease for one additional 10-year period at the then-current market rental rate. In addition, Winston & Strawn LLP has expansion options should space become available in the Leo Burnett Chicago Building.
 
The current aggregate annual base rent for the remaining tenants in the Leo Burnett Chicago Building is approximately $2.3 million.
 
Acquisition of Washington, DC Portfolio
 
On November 19, 2003, Wells OP acquired: (1) all of the outstanding common stock in BCSP II Washington Properties, Inc. (Washington Properties REIT), a Maryland corporation qualifying as a real estate investment trust, which owns interests in three office buildings in the Washington, DC area (Washington, DC REIT Buildings), through its ownership in various operating entities; and (2) all of the membership interest in 4250 North Fairfax Property LLC (Fairfax Property LLC), a Delaware limited liability company which owns a 14-story office building located in Arlington, Virginia (4250 North Fairfax Arlington Building) (collectively, the Washington, DC Portfolio). The Washington, DC Portfolio
 
3

Table of Contents
was acquired from Beacon Capital Strategic Partners II, L.P. (Beacon Capital Partners), a Delaware limited partnership, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $347.0 million. Beacon Capital Partners is not in any way affiliated with the Wells REIT, Wells OP or our Advisor. At closing, the name of the Washington Properties REIT was changed to Wells Washington Properties, Inc.
 
Washington, DC REIT Buildings
 
The Washington, DC REIT Buildings consist of an eight-story office building located at 400 Virginia Avenue (400 Virginia Building); a 12-story office building located at 1201 Eye Street (US Park Service Building); and a 12-story office building located at 1225 Eye Street (1225 Eye Street Building). Wells OP received a credit against the purchase price paid at closing in the amount of approximately $115.6 million consisting of (1) approximately $115.2 million representing the amount of the existing indebtedness secured by the US Park Service Building and the 1225 Eye Street Building held by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife); and (2) the liquidation price of the Series A Preferred Stock (Washington Properties REIT Preferred Stock) of Washington Properties REIT, plus dividends payable to the holders of such stock from November 20, 2003 until December 31, 2003, in the amount of approximately $0.4 million. 369 shares of Washington Properties REIT Preferred Stock remained outstanding to various stockholders at closing. The Washington Properties REIT has the right to redeem any or all of the outstanding Washington Properties REIT Preferred Stock on or after December 31, 2003 for an aggregate redemption price of approximately $0.4 million.
 
400 Virginia Building
 
The Washington Properties REIT owns all of the membership interest in 400 Virginia Avenue LLC (Virginia Avenue LLC), a Delaware limited liability company which owns the 400 Virginia Building containing approximately 213,000 aggregate rentable square feet. The 400 Virginia Building, which was completed in 1985, is leased to various agencies of the United States government (approximately 37%), Lockheed Martin Corporation (approximately 22%), and 12 additional tenants (approximately 41%), with the weighted average lease term remaining of approximately four years. The current aggregate annual base rent for the 14 tenants in the 400 Virginia Building is approximately $7.4 million.
 
US Park Service Building
 
The Washington Properties REIT owns all of the membership interest in 1201 Equity LLC, a Delaware limited liability company which owns a 49.5% membership interest in 1201 Eye Street, N.W. Associates LLC (1201 Associates), a Delaware limited liability company which owns the US Park Service Building containing approximately 269,000 aggregate rentable square feet. Approximately 50.0% of 1201 Associates is owned by One Franklin Plaza, LLC (One Franklin), a Delaware limited liability company, and the remaining approximately 0.5% of 1201 Associates is owned by six additional owners. Neither One Franklin nor any of the other owners of membership interests in 1201 Associates are affiliated in any way with the Wells REIT, Wells OP, or our Advisor.
 
The US Park Service Building, which was completed in 2001, is primarily leased to the United States of America on behalf of the United States National Park Service (approximately 82%). Approximately 18% of the US Park Service Building is leased to four additional tenants.
 
The United States National Park Service (US Park Service) is a bureau of the Department of the Interior of the United States government. The Park Service administers natural, historical, and recreational areas that are set aside as such by the United States government. The US Park Service manages approximately 83 million acres in 49 states, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, Saipan, and the Virgin Islands. The current annual base rent payable under the US Park Service lease, which expires in 2012, is approximately $8.2 million. The current aggregate annual base rent for the remaining four tenants in the US Park Service Building is approximately $2.1 million.
 
4

Table of Contents
1201 Associates has three outstanding mortgage loans having an aggregate outstanding principal balance, as of November 19, 2003, of approximately $96.9 million. The first mortgage loan is held by MetLife and had an outstanding principal balance, as of November 19, 2003, of approximately $67.6 million. The outstanding principal balance of the second mortgage loan, as of November 19, 2003, was approximately $7.5 million and is held by TZO Lending LLC (TZO), a Delaware limited liability company which is wholly owned by Washington Properties REIT. The outstanding principal balance of the third mortgage loan, as of November 19, 2003, was approximately $21.9 million and is held by 1215 ESDI LLC (ESDI), a Delaware limited liability company which is wholly owned by TZO.
 
The first mortgage loan held by MetLife secured by the US Park Service Building bears interest at the rate of 4.4% per annum, requires monthly payments of interest only in the amount of approximately $0.3 million, and matures on November 1, 2007. The MetLife loan documents impose certain restrictions on the transfer of the US Park Service Building and upon the transfer of the ownership of entities owning interests in the US Park Service Building. The second and third mortgage loans secured by the US Park Service Building provide for base interest in the amount of 15% per annum plus additional interest currently equal to 95% of the excess cash flow, if any, generated by the US Park Service Building. The second and third mortgage loans secured by the US Park Service Building mature on November 20, 2017, and contain substantial prepayment penalties except in conjunction with prepayments made pursuant to the provisions described in the following paragraph.
 
1201 Associates is prohibited from selling the US Park Service Building without the consent of One Franklin prior to November 1, 2007, and from prepaying the outstanding balance of the first mortgage loan held by MetLife, except that the MetLife loan may be replaced by substantially similar non-recourse debt in an amount not less than the then current outstanding principal balance of the MetLife loan and so long as the maturity date of such debt is not prior to November 1, 2007. Thereafter, 1201 Associates is required to use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain similar non-recourse debt through December 31, 2011. 1201 Associates has a right to prepay up to 50% of the outstanding principal balance of the second mortgage loan, which is required to be exercised during specific time periods in 2004 through 2006. If 1201 Associates exercises such prepayment right, TZO has the option to acquire up to 50% of the membership interest in 1201 Associates. In addition, 1201 Associates has a right to prepay up to 50% of the outstanding principal balance of the third mortgage loan, which is also required to be exercised during specific time periods in 2004 through 2006. If 1201 Associates exercises such prepayment right, ESDI has the option to acquire up to 50% of the membership interest in 1201 Associates.
 
1225 Eye Street Building
 
The Washington Properties REIT owns all of the membership interest in 1225 Equity LLC, a Delaware limited liability company which owns a 49.5% membership interest in 1225 Eye Street, N.W. Associates LLC (1225 Associates), a Delaware limited liability company which owns the 1225 Eye Street Building containing approximately 218,000 aggregate rentable square feet. Approximately 50.0% of 1225 Associates is owned by One Franklin, and the remaining approximately 0.5% of 1225 Associates is owned by seven additional owners. None of the other owners of membership interests in 1225 Associates are affiliated in any way with the Wells REIT, Wells OP, or our Advisor.
 
The 1225 Eye Street Building, which was completed in 1985, is approximately 93% leased to 24 tenants, and approximately 7% of the 1225 Eye Street Building is currently vacant. The current aggregate annual base rent for the 24 tenants in the 1225 Eye Street Building is approximately $6.6 million. The current weighted average remaining lease term of the 24 tenants is five years.
 
1225 Associates has two outstanding mortgage loans for an aggregate outstanding principal balance, as of November 19, 2003, of approximately $67.8 million. The first mortgage loan is held by MetLife and had an outstanding principal balance, as of November 19, 2003, of approximately $47.6
 
5

Table of Contents
million. The outstanding principal balance of the second mortgage loan, as of November 19, 2003, was approximately $20.2 million and is held by TTF Lending LLC (TTF), a Delaware limited liability company which is wholly owned by Washington Properties REIT.
 
The first mortgage loan held by MetLife secured by the 1225 Eye Street Building bears interest at the rate of 4.4% per annum, requires monthly payments of interest only in the amount of approximately $0.2 million, and matures on November 1, 2007. The MetLife loan documents impose certain restrictions on the transfer of the 1225 Eye Street Building and upon the transfer of the ownership of entities owning interests in the 1225 Eye Street Building. The second mortgage loan secured by the 1225 Eye Street Building held by TTF provides for base interest in the amount of 15% per annum plus additional interest currently equal to 96% of the excess cash flow generated by the 1225 Eye Street Building. The second mortgage loan held by TTF matures on October 31, 2017, and contains substantial prepayment penalties except in conjunction with prepayments made pursuant to the provisions described in the following paragraph.
 
1225 Associates is prohibited from selling the 1225 Eye Street Building without the consent of One Franklin prior to November 1, 2007, and from prepaying the outstanding balance of the first mortgage loan held by MetLife, except that the MetLife loan may be replaced by substantially similar non-recourse debt in an amount not less than the then current outstanding principal balance of the MetLife loan and so long as the maturity date of such debt is not prior to November 1, 2007. Thereafter, 1225 Associates is required to use commercially reasonably efforts to maintain similar non-recourse debt through December 31, 2011. 1225 Associates has a right to prepay up to 50% of the outstanding principal balance of the second mortgage loan, which is required to be exercised during specific time periods in 2004 through 2006. If 1201 Associates exercises such prepayment right, TTF has the option to acquire up to 50% of the membership interest in 1201 Associates.
 
4250 North Fairfax Arlington Building
 
As a part of the same transaction involving the acquisition of all of the common stock of the Washington Properties REIT, on November 19, 2003, Wells OP acquired all of the membership interest in Fairfax Property LLC, which owns the 4250 North Fairfax Arlington Building, a 14-story office building containing approximately 304,000 aggregate rentable square feet located at 4250 North Fairfax Street in Arlington, Virginia.
 
The 4250 North Fairfax Arlington Building, which was completed in 1998, is approximately 53% leased to Qwest Communications Corporation. Approximately 46% of the 4250 North Fairfax Arlington Building is leased to four additional tenants, and approximately 1% of the 4250 North Fairfax Arlington Building is currently vacant.
 
Quest Communications Corporation (Qwest) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Qwest Communications International, Inc. (Qwest Intl.), which provides long distance, wireless, data and video services in the western and mid-western United States to residential and business customers. The current annual base rent payable under the Qwest lease, which expires in 2014, is approximately $3.0 million. Qwest has obtained a $4.2 million letter of credit from U.S. Bank, N.A., which expires in June 2004, to serve as security for payments under the lease. The Qwest lease contains a right of first offer provision with respect to a future sale of the 4250 North Fairfax Arlington Building. In addition, Qwest, at its option, has the right to extend the initial term of its lease for two additional five-year periods at 95% of the then-current market rental rate. The current aggregate annual base rent for the remaining six tenants in the 4250 North Fairfax Arlington Building is approximately $1.5 million.

6

Table of Contents
Property Management
 
Wells Management Company, Inc. (Wells Management), an affiliate of the Wells REIT and the Advisor, will manage the Leo Burnett Chicago Building, the 1225 Eye Street Building and the 4250 North Fairfax Arlington Building. Wells Management will be paid asset and property management fees in the amount of up to 4.5% of the gross revenues from the Leo Burnett Chicago Building, the 1225 Eye Street Building, and the 4250 North Fairfax Arlington Building, subject to certain limitations. The Buck Management Group, Inc. (Buck Management), an affiliate of Buck 35 Wacker, L.L.C., The John Akridge Management Company (John Akridge), an affiliate of One Franklin, and Trammell Crowe Company (Trammell Crowe) are the current on-site property managers for the Leo Burnett Chicago Building, the 1225 Eye Street Building, and the 4250 North Fairfax Arlington Building, respectively. The property management fees payable to Buck Management, John Akridge, and Trammell Crowe will be paid out of or credited against the fees payable to Wells Management.
 
John Akridge was retained to serve as the property manager for the US Park Service Building. Trammell Crowe was retained to serve as the property manager for the 400 Virginia Building. Neither Buck Management, John Akridge nor Trammell Crowe are in any way affiliated with the Wells REIT, Wells OP or our Advisor.
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section contained in Supplement No. 6 dated April 14, 2003, Supplement No. 7 dated May 15, 2003, and Supplement No. 9 dated August 27, 2003, and should also be read in conjunction with our accompanying financial statements and notes thereto.
 
Forward Looking Statements
 
This supplement contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including discussion and analysis of our financial condition, anticipated capital expenditures required to complete certain projects, amounts of anticipated cash distributions to stockholders in the future and certain other matters. Readers of this supplement should be aware that there are various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements made in this supplement, which include changes in general economic conditions, changes in real estate conditions, construction costs which may exceed estimates, construction delays, increases in interest rates, lease-up risks, inability to obtain new tenants upon the expiration of existing leases, inability to invest in properties on a timely basis or in properties that will provide targeted rates of return and the potential need to fund tenant improvements or other capital expenditures out of operating cash flow.
 
REIT Qualification
 
We have made an election under Section 856 of the Internal Revenue Code to be taxed as a REIT beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 1998. As a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that we distribute to shareholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year in which our qualification is lost. Such an event could materially, adversely affect our financial position and results of operations. However, management believes that we are organized and operate in a manner which will enable us to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes during the year ending December 31, 2003. In addition, we intend to continue to operate to remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, we received aggregate gross offering proceeds of $1,782.5 million from the sale of 178.2 million shares of our common stock. After incurring costs of $61.0 million in acquisition and advisory fees and acquisition expenses, $183.1 million in selling commissions and organization and offering expenses and common stock redemptions of $41.2 million pursuant to our share redemption program, we raised net offering proceeds of $1,497.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2003.
 
7

Table of Contents
The significant increase in capital resources available to us is due to significantly increased sales of our common stock during the first nine months of 2003. After payment of the costs described above associated with the sale of shares of common stock and acquisitions of properties, we had approximately $146.0 million available for investment in real estate assets as of September 30, 2003.
 
As of September 30, 2003, we owned interests in 87 real estate properties either directly or through our interests in joint ventures located throughout the United States. Our real estate investment policies are to identify and invest in high-grade commercial office and industrial buildings located in densely populated metropolitan markets which are newly constructed, under construction or which have been previously constructed and have operating histories. However, we are not limited to such investments. We expect to continue to acquire commercial properties that meet our standards of quality in terms of the real estate and the creditworthiness of the tenants.
 
We have developed specific standards for determining creditworthiness of potential tenants of our properties in order to reduce the risk of tenant default. Although authorized to enter into leases with any type of tenant, we anticipate that a majority of our tenants will be large corporations or other entities which have a net worth in excess of $100 million or whose lease obligations are guaranteed by another corporation or entity with a net worth in excess of $100 million.
 
Creditworthy tenants of the type we target are becoming more and more highly valued in the marketplace and, accordingly, there is increased competition in acquiring properties with these creditworthy tenants. As a result, the purchase prices for such properties have increased with corresponding reductions in cap rates and returns on investment. In addition, changes in market conditions have caused us to add to our internal procedures for ensuring the creditworthiness of our tenants before entering into any commitment to buy a property. We continue to remain steadfast in our commitment to invest in quality properties that will produce quality income for our shareholders.
 
Dividends paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2003, were $147.0 million compared to $71.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2002. For each $10 share of our common stock, our board of directors declared dividends for the period December 16, 2002 through September 15, 2003, at an annualized percentage rate of return of 7.0%, compared to an annualized percentage rate of return of 7.75% for the period December 16, 2001 through September 15, 2002. The reduction of the annualized percentage rate of return for the dividends resulted from the higher value placed on our type of properties and the additional time it now takes in the acquisition process for us to assess tenant creditworthiness and, therefore, invest proceeds in properties.
 
Our board of directors has declared dividends for the period September 16, 2003, through December 15, 2003, at an annualized percentage rate of return of 7.0%. Fourth quarter dividends are calculated on a daily record basis of $0.001923 (0.1923 cents) per day per share on the outstanding shares of our common stock payable to shareholders of record as shown on our books at the close of business on each day during the period commencing on September 16, 2003, and continuing on each day thereafter through and including December 15, 2003.
 
The payment of dividends in the future will generally be dependent upon the cash flows from operating the properties currently owned and acquired in future periods, our financial condition, amounts paid for properties acquired, the timing of property acquisitions, capital expenditure requirements and distribution requirements in order to maintain our REIT status under the Internal Revenue Code.
 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
 
Our net cash provided by operating activities was $150.3 million and $68.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was due primarily to the net income generated by $1.4 billion of additional properties acquired
 
8

Table of Contents
during 2002 and an additional $1.3 billion of real estate assets acquired and $80.9 million in build-to-suit projects completed during the nine months ended September 30, 2003. We do not recognize in income the full effect from the properties during the year of acquisition, as the operations of the properties are only included in income from the date of acquisition. Operating cash flows are expected to increase as we acquire additional properties in future periods and as we obtain the benefit of a full quarter of operations for properties acquired during the quarter ended September 30, 2003.
 
Cash Flows Used In Investing Activities
 
Our net cash used in investing activities was $1,275.9 million and $826.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in net cash used in investing activities was due primarily to greater investments in properties and the payment of the related deferred project costs resulting from raising a greater amount of offering proceeds. Our investments in real estate and related assets and payment of acquisition and advisory costs totaled $1,283.6 million and $832.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The cash outflow from the investments in properties and the payment of deferred project costs were partially offset by distributions from joint ventures of $7.7 million and $5.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2003, and 2002, respectively. The increase in distributions from joint ventures is primarily due to the distribution of proceeds from the disposition of the Cort property.
 
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
 
Our net cash provided by financing activities was $1,260.9 million and $827.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Capital fund raising increased to $1,782.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to $988.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The amounts raised were partially offset by the payment of commissions and offering costs totaling $182.0 million and $105.0 million and redemptions of $41.2 million and $11.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
 
Additionally, we obtained funds from financing arrangements totaling $649.3 million and $27.7 million and made repayments of borrowings of $796.1 million and $0.04 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, based on the availability and need of cash for investment in real estate assets during those periods. We incurred deferred financing costs related to new financing facilities of $4.6 million and $1.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002. Primarily as a result of the increased cash flow from operations, during the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, we paid dividends of $147.0 million and $71.4 million, respectively.
 
Results of Operations
 
As of September 30, 2003, our 87 real estate properties were approximately 97% leased. Our results of operations have changed significantly for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, generally as result of the acquisition of approximately $1.4 billion of real estate assets during the year ended December 31, 2002, and an additional $1.3 billion of real estate assets acquired and $80.9 million in build-to-suit projects completed during the nine months ended September 30, 2003. We expect that rental income, tenant reimbursements, depreciation expense, operating expenses, asset and property management and leasing fees and net income will each increase in future periods as a result of owning the assets acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2003, for an entire period and as a result of anticipated future acquisitions of real estate assets. Due to the average remaining terms of the long-term leases currently in place at our properties, management does not anticipate significant changes in near-term rental revenues from properties currently owned.
 
9

Table of Contents
Three months ended September 30, 2003 vs. three months ended September 30, 2002
 
Rental income increased by $52.4 million, during the third quarter of 2003, from $27.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, to $79.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003. Tenant reimbursements were $25.5 million and $3.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, for an increase of $21.8 million. The increases were primarily due to the rental income and tenant reimbursements for properties acquired subsequent to June 30, 2002, which totaled $56.2 million and $20.3 million, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and $4.8 million and $0.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002. Revenues in future periods are expected to increase compared to historical periods as additional properties are acquired.
 
Our equity in income of joint ventures was $1.1 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease is primarily due to the loss related to the sale of the Cort property in September 2003. Equity in income of joint ventures is not anticipated to change significantly in future periods unless we invest additional proceeds in future joint venture investments or dispose of joint venture investments.
 
Depreciation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, was $29.0 million and $10.3 million, respectively comprising approximately 36% and 37% of rental income for the respective three month periods. The increase in depreciation expense is primarily due to the acquisitions of properties since June 30, 2002. Depreciation expense relating to assets acquired after June 30, 2002, was $20.7 million and $2.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002, respectively. Depreciation expense is expected to increase in future periods as additional properties are acquired, however should remain relatively consistent as a percentage of revenues unless the relationship between the cost of the assets and the revenues earned changes.
 
Property operating costs were $34.6 million and $5.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, representing 33% and 19% of the sum of the rental income and tenant reimbursements for each respective three month period. The increase of property operating costs as a percentage of the sum of the rental income and tenant reimbursements is primarily due to the recent acquisition of certain full service properties that have a higher ratio of property operating costs to revenues. Property operating costs for the properties acquired subsequent to June 30, 2002 were $27.5 million and $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Property operating costs are expected to increase as more properties are acquired, but expenses should remain relatively consistent as a percentage of the sum of rental income and tenant reimbursements.
 
Asset and property management and leasing fees expenses were $3.9 million and $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, representing approximately 4% of the sum of the rental income and tenant reimbursements for each three month period. Asset and property management fees for properties acquired after June 30, 2002, were $2.7 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Asset and property management fees are expected to increase as additional properties are acquired but as a percentage of the sum of rental income and tenant reimbursements, should remain relatively consistent with historical results.
 
General and administrative expenses increased from $0.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, to $1.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003, representing approximately 2% of the total revenues for each respective three month period. General and administrative expenses are expected to increase in future periods as additional properties are acquired, but are expected to remain relatively constant as a percentage of total revenues.
 
10

Table of Contents
Interest expense was $3.8 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Interest expense of $1.0 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, was attributable to interest on the bonds related to the Ingram Micro and ISS Buildings, which is offset by the interest income associated with the bonds, which results in no net impact on our operating results. The remaining $2.8 million and $0.3 million is due to the interest on our outstanding borrowings and amortization of deferred financing costs for each period. We had significantly more borrowings outstanding during the three months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2002, resulting in a significant increase in the interest expense between the two periods. Interest expense in future periods will be dependent upon the amount of borrowings outstanding during those periods and current interest rates. Historical results may not be indicative of interest expense in future periods.
 
Earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2003, increased to $0.10 per share compared to $0.09 per share for the three months ended September 30, 2002. In 2003, a higher percentage of investor proceeds raised were invested in income producing real estate assets than during the same period in 2002, which resulted in increased earnings in 2003 relative to 2002. This increase in earnings is partially offset by higher costs of investment.
 
Nine months ended September 30, 2003 vs. nine months ended September 30, 2002
 
Rental income increased by $136.1 million, during the first nine months of 2003, from $66.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, to $202.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Tenant reimbursements were $51.5 million and $12.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, for an increase of $38.6 million. The increases were primarily due to the rental income and tenant reimbursements for properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 2001, which totaled $152.0 million and $38.9 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, and $17.5 million and $1.8 million for the first nine months of 2002. Revenues in future periods are expected to increase compared to historical periods as additional properties are acquired.
 
Our equity in income of joint ventures was $3.5 million and $3.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease is primarily due to the loss related to the sale of the Cort property in September 2003. Equity in income of joint ventures is not anticipated to change significantly in future periods unless we invest additional proceeds in future joint venture investments or dispose of joint venture investments.
 
Depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, was $73.2 million and $23.2 million, respectively comprising approximately 36% and 35% of rental income for the respective nine month periods. Depreciation expense relating to assets acquired after December 31, 2001, was $56.4 million and $7.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Depreciation expense is expected to increase in future periods as additional properties are acquired, however should remain relatively consistent as a percentage of revenues unless the relationship between the cost of the assets and the revenues earned changes.
 
Property operating costs were $75.6 million and $17.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, representing approximately 30% and 22% of the sum of the rental income and tenant reimbursements for each respective nine month period. The increase in the property operating costs as a percentage of the sum of the rental income and tenant reimbursements is primarily due to operating costs of the recently acquired full service properties as a percentage of revenues. Property operating costs for the properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 2001, were $58.9 million and $2.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Property operating costs are expected to increase as more properties are acquired, but expenses should remain relatively consistent as a percentage of the sum of rental income and tenant reimbursements.
 
11

Table of Contents
Asset and property management and leasing fees expenses were $9.1 million and $3.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, representing approximately 4% of the sum of the rental income and tenant reimbursements for each nine month period. Management and leasing fees for properties acquired after December 31, 2002, were $6.4 million and $0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Management and leasing fees are expected to increase as additional properties are acquired; however, as a percentage of the sum of rental income and tenant reimbursements should remain relatively consistent with historical results.
 
General and administrative expenses increased from $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, to $4.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, representing approximately 2% of the total revenues for each respective nine month period. General and administrative expenses are expected to increase in future periods as our assets continue to increase as additional properties are acquired, but are expected to remain relatively constant as a percentage of total revenues.
 
Interest expense was $11.2 million and $2.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Interest expense of $2.9 million and $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, was attributable to interest on the bonds related to the Ingram Micro and ISS Buildings, which is offset by the interest income associated with the bonds, which results in no net impact on our operating results. The remaining $8.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively, is due to the interest on our outstanding borrowings for each period and amortization of deferred financing costs. We had significantly more borrowings outstanding during the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2002, resulting in a significant increase in the interest expense between the two periods. Additionally, in the period ending September 30, 2003, we wrote-off approximately $0.5 million of deferred costs associated with the Bank of America $110.0 million line of credit termination (See Note 4 of our consolidated financial statements for further information). Interest expense in future periods will be dependent upon the amount of borrowings outstanding during those periods and current interest rates. Historical results may not be indicative of interest expense in future periods.
 
Earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, decreased to $0.30 per share compared to $0.31 per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. This decrease is primarily a result of the higher cost of investments in the real estate assets we acquired in 2003 relative to returns on those investments resulting in lower per share earnings in 2003.
 
Funds From Operations
 
Funds from Operations (FFO), as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), generally means net income, computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) excluding extraordinary items (as defined by GAAP) and gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus depreciation and amortization on real estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships, joint ventures and subsidiaries. Management believes that FFO is helpful to investors as a measure of the performance of an equity REIT. However, our calculation of FFO, while consistent with NAREIT’s definition, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other REITs. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions.
 
12

Table of Contents
The following table reflects the calculation of FFO for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002:
 
 	  	For the three months
ended September 30,

	  	For the nine months
ended September 30,

	
 	  	2003

	  	2002

	  	2003

	  	2002

	
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Net income	  	$	33,820	  	$	15,285	  	$	86,169	  	$	39,821	
Add:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Depreciation of real estate assets	  	 	28,963	  	 	10,282	  	 	73,241	  	 	23,185	
Amortization of deferred leasing costs	  	 	895	  	 	78	  	 	1,244	  	 	229	
Depreciation & amortization—unconsolidated investments in joint venture assets	  	 	805	  	 	708	  	 	2,370	  	 	2,115	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	
Funds from Operations (FFO)	  	$	64,483	  	$	26,353	  	$	163,024	  	$	65,350	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES BASIC AND DILUTED	  	 	350,741	  	 	163,395	  	 	289,521	  	 	128,541	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	
 
In order to recognize revenues on a straight line basis over the terms of the respective leases, we recognized straight line rental revenue of $5.7 million and $2.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, we recognized straight line rental revenue of $10.8 million and $5.3 million, respectively.
 
Amortization of the intangible lease assets included in deferred leasing costs in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets resulted in an increase in amortization of deferred leasing costs of approximately $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Amortization of the other intangible lease assets and liabilities resulted in a net decrease in rental revenue of $1.3 million and $0.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively.
 
Inflation
 
The real estate market has not been affected significantly by inflation in the past three years due to the relatively low inflation rate. However, there are provisions in the majority of tenant leases, which would protect us from the impact of inflation. These provisions include reimbursement billings for operating expense pass-through charges, real estate tax and insurance reimbursements on a per square foot basis, or in some cases, annual reimbursement of operating expenses above a certain per square foot allowance. However, due to the long-term nature of the leases, the leases may not re-set frequently enough to cover inflation.
 
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
 
Our accounting policies have been established to conform with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If management’s judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied; thus, resulting in a different presentation of the financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.
 
13

Table of Contents
Investment in Real Estate Assets
 
We are required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of our depreciable assets. We consider the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. These assessments have a direct impact on net income. The estimated useful lives of our assets by class are as follows:
 
Building	  	25 years	
Building improvements	  	10-25 years	
Land improvements	  	20-25 years	
Tenant improvements	  	Lease term	
Intangible lease assets	  	Lease term	
 
In the event that inappropriate useful lives or methods are used for depreciation, our net income would be misstated.
 
Allocation of Purchase Price of Acquired Assets
 
On January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 “Business Combinations,” (“FAS 141”) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 “ Goodwill and Intangibles”  (“FAS 142”). These standards govern business combinations, asset acquisitions and the accounting for acquired intangibles.
 
Upon the acquisition of real properties, it is our policy to allocate the purchase price of properties to acquired tangible assets, consisting of land and building, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, and the value of in-place leases, based in each case on their fair values.
 
The fair values of the tangible assets of an acquired property (which includes land and building) are determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land and building based on management’s determination of the relative fair value of these assets. We determine the as-if vacant fair value of a property using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers. Factors we considered in performing these analyses include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses during the expected lease-up periods based on current market demand. We estimate costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, and other related costs.
 
The fair values of above-market and below-market in-place leases are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) our estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the leases. The capitalized above-market and below-market lease values are amortized as an adjustment to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases.
 
The fair values of in-place leases include direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant, opportunity costs associated with lost rentals which are avoided by acquiring an in-place lease, and tenant relationships. Direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant include commissions, tenant improvements and other direct costs and are estimated based on our consideration of current market costs to execute a similar lease. These direct costs are included in deferred leasing costs in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are amortized to expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases. The value of opportunity costs is calculated using the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases over a market absorption period for a similar lease. Customer relationships are valued
 
14

Table of Contents
based on expected renewal of a lease or the likelihood of obtaining a particular tenant for other locations. These lease intangibles are included in intangible lease assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are amortized to rental income over the remaining term of the respective leases.
 
Estimates of the fair values of the tangible and intangible assets requires us to estimate market lease rates, property operating expenses, carrying costs during lease-up periods, discount rates, market absorption periods and the number of years the property is held for investment. The use of inappropriate estimates would result in an incorrect assessment of our purchase price allocations, which could impact the amount of our reported net income.
 
Valuation of Real Estate Assets
 
We continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets, both operating properties and properties under construction, in which we have an ownership interest, either directly or through investments in joint ventures, may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present which indicate that the carrying amounts of real estate assets may not be recoverable, we assess the recoverability of the real estate assets by determining whether the carrying value of the real estate assets will be recovered through the undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, we adjust the real estate assets to the fair value and recognize an impairment loss. We have determined that there has been no impairment in the carrying value of real estate assets held by us and any unconsolidated joint ventures at September 30, 2003.
 
Commitments and Contingencies
 
We are subject to certain contingent liabilities and commitments with regard to certain transactions. Refer to Notes 7 and 8 to our consolidated financial statements for further explanation. Examples of such commitments and contingencies include:
 
•      Take Out Purchase and Escrow Agreements	
 	
•      Letters of Credit	
 	
•      Commitments Under Existing Lease Agreements	
 	
•      Earn-out Agreements	
 	
•      Leasehold Property Obligations	
 	
•      Pending Litigation	
 	
•      NASD Enforcement Action	
 
Related Party Transactions and Agreements
 
We have entered into agreements with the Advisor and its affiliates, whereby we pay certain fees or reimbursements to the Advisor or its affiliates for acquisition and advisory fees and expenses, organization and offering costs, sales commissions dealer manager fees, asset and property management fees and reimbursement of operating costs. See Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements included in this report for a discussion of the various related party transactions, agreements and fees.
 
Conflicts of Interest
 
The Advisor is also a general partner in and advisor to various Wells Real Estate Funds. As such, there are conflicts of interest where the Advisor, while serving in the capacity as general partner for Wells Real Estate Funds, may be in competition with us in connection with property acquisitions or for tenants in similar geographic markets.
 
15

Table of Contents
Additionally, certain members of the board also serve on the board of another REIT sponsored by the Advisor and will encounter certain conflicts of interest regarding investment and operations decisions.
 
Subsequent Events
 
Sale of Shares of Common Stock
 
From October 1, 2003 through December 8, 2003, we had raised approximately $574.7 million through the issuance of approximately 57.5 million shares of our common stock. As of December 11, 2003, there were no shares remaining available for sale to the public under our fourth public offering, exclusive of (1) shares available for sale to current stockholders of the Wells REIT pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan and (2) shares reserved to complete requests for transfer of asset transactions which were received on or before November 21, 2003.
 
Status of our Share Redemption Program
 
Our share redemption program allowed for the redemption of approximately 4.37 million shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $43.7 million for the year ending December 31, 2003. From January 1, 2003 through October 31, 2003, we had redeemed the entire 4.37 million shares of common stock available for redemption for the year at an aggregate cost of approximately $43.7 million and, accordingly, there are no remaining shares available for redemption for the year ending December 31, 2003. Requests for potential redemption will not be eligible for redemption until after January 1, 2004, subject, in all cases, to the board’s ability to change or terminate our share redemption program at any time in its discretion.
 
Legal Proceedings
 
On October 9, 2003, Stephen L. Flood, the Luzerne County Controller, and the Luzerne County Retirement Board (Luzerne Board) on behalf of the Luzerne County Employee Retirement System (Plan) filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania against 26 separate defendants including the Wells REIT, Wells Investment Securities, Inc., the dealer manager, and Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc., the parent company of both the Advisor and Wells Investment Securities, Inc. (Wells Defendants). The complaint alleges, among other things, (1) that certain former members of the Luzerne Board named as defendants invested $10 million in the Wells REIT on behalf of the Plan, (2) that certain former board member defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Plan by, among other things, permitting the investment of the Plan’s funds in investments not suitable for the Plan because they were long-term illiquid investments, permitting the Plan to pay excessive fees and commissions to co-defendants, and accepting political contributions in exchange for awarding advisory and management agreements, (3) that the Wells Defendants and others knew or should have known that the investment, and the fees and commissions associated with the investment, was not a proper investment for the Plan because it was a long-term illiquid investment, (4) that the Wells Defendants and others knew or should have known that certain Luzerne Board members and certain investment advisors and managers were breaching their fiduciary duties to the Plan, (5) that the defendants engaged in and conspired to engage in an improper scheme to intentionally defraud the Plan, and (6) that the investment was not approved by a majority of the Luzerne Board at a public meeting and, consequently, the investment was an inappropriate and void action. The Plan is seeking damages of not less than $25 million, treble damages and punitive damages from all defendants on a joint and several liability basis. The Wells REIT believes that this lawsuit is without merit with respect to the Wells Defendants. While it is too early to determine the likely outcome of this lawsuit, after consultation with legal counsel, management does not believe that a reserve for a loss contingency is necessary.
 
16

Table of Contents
Property Acquisitions
 
IBM Portland
 
On October 9, 2003, Wells REIT purchased four multi-story office buildings and one industrial building containing approximately 364,000 aggregate rentable square feet on an approximately 20.9-acre tract of land (IBM Portland Buildings) and an additional adjacent 31.8-acre tract of land in Beaverton, Oregon, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $38.2 million, plus closing costs. Three of the five IBM Portland Buildings contain approximately 220,000 aggregate rentable square feet, are entirely leased under three separate net leases to IBM. The remaining two buildings contain approximately 144,000 aggregate rentable square footage are currently vacant.
 
Leo Burnett Chicago
 
On November 6, 2003, Wells 35 W. Wacker, LLC, a single member Delaware limited liability company wholly owned by Wells OP, purchased a 97.9396% general partnership interest in VV City-Buck Venture, L.P. (VV City), a Delaware limited partnership, which is the owner of a 96.5007% general partnership interest in 35 W. Wacker Venture, L.P. (Wacker Venture), which owns a 50-story office building containing approximately 1.1 million aggregate rentable square feet at 35 W. Wacker Drive in Chicago, Illinois (Leo Burnett Chicago Building) for a purchase price of approximately $267.5 million, plus closing costs. As a result of this two-tier partnership structure, Wells OP indirectly acquired a 94.5124% interest in the Leo Burnett Chicago Building. Wells OP received a credit against the purchase price at closing in the amount of approximately $139.3 million representing its pro rata portion of the existing indebtedness against the Leo Burnett Chicago Building in the amount of approximately $147.4 million. Buck 35 Wacker, L.L.C. retained a 2.0604% limited partnership interest in VV City, and Leo Burnett USA, Inc. (Leo Burnett) retained a 3.4993% limited partnership interest in Wacker Venture. The Leo Burnett Chicago Building is primarily leased to Leo Burnett and Winston & Strawn LLP, which together lease approximately 89% of the Leo Burnett Chicago Building. Various other tenants lease an additional approximately 9% of the Leo Burnett Chicago Building, and approximately 2% of the Leo Burnett Chicago Building is currently vacant.
 
Acquisition of Washington, DC Portfolio
 
On November 19, 2003, Wells OP acquired: (1) all of the common stock in BCSP II Washington Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation qualifying as a real estate investment trust, which owns interests in three office buildings in the Washington, DC area (Washington, DC REIT Buildings), through its ownership in various operating entities; and (2) all of the membership interest in 4250 North Fairfax Property LLC (Fairfax Property LLC), a Delaware limited liability company which owns a 14-story office building located in Arlington, Virginia (4250 North Fairfax Arlington Building) (collectively, Washington, DC Portfolio). The Washington, DC Portfolio was acquired from Beacon Capital Strategic Partners II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $347.0 million.
 
Financial Statements
 
Unaudited Financial Statements
 
The financial statements of the Wells REIT, as of September 30, 2003, and for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003, which are included in this supplement, have not been audited.
 
The pro forma balance sheet of the Wells REIT, as of September 30, 2003, the pro forma statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2002, and the pro forma statement of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, which are included in this supplement, have not been audited.
 
17

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
 	 	 	  	Page

	
Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries	  	 	
 	 	 	
 	 	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2003 (unaudited) and December 31, 2002	  	19	
 	 	 	
 	 	Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited)	  	20	
 	 	 	
 	 	Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the year ended December 31, 2002 and the nine months ended September 30, 2003 (unaudited)	  	21	
 	 	 	
 	 	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited)	  	22	
 	 	 	
 	 	Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	  	23	
 	 	 	
 	 	Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements	  	 	
 	 	 	
 	 	Summary of Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements	  	37	
 	 	 	
 	 	Pro Forma Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2003 (unaudited)	  	38	
 	 	 	
 	 	Pro Forma Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2002 (unaudited)	  	40	
 	 	 	
 	 	Pro Forma Statement of Income for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 (unaudited)	  	41	

18

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share amounts)
 
 	  	September 30,
2003

	 	 	December 31,
2002

	 	
 	  	(unaudited)	 	 	 	 	
ASSETS:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Real estate assets, at cost:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Land	  	$	393,014	 	 	$	279,185	 	
Building and improvements, less accumulated depreciation of $136,835 at September 30, 2003, and $63,594 at December 31, 2002	  	 	2,777,415	 	 	 	1,683,036	 	
Intangible lease assets, net	  	 	120,873	 	 	 	12,060	 	
Construction in progress	  	 	943	 	 	 	42,746	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	
Total real estate assets	  	 	3,292,245	 	 	 	2,017,027	 	
Investments in joint ventures	  	 	104,098	 	 	 	83,915	 	
Cash and cash equivalents	  	 	180,641	 	 	 	45,464	 	
Rents receivable	  	 	35,889	 	 	 	19,321	 	
Deferred project costs	  	 	5,724	 	 	 	1,494	 	
Due from affiliates	  	 	2,083	 	 	 	1,961	 	
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net	  	 	17,657	 	 	 	4,407	 	
Deferred leasing costs, net	  	 	49,198	 	 	 	1,638	 	
Investment in bonds	  	 	54,500	 	 	 	54,500	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	
Total assets	  	$	3,742,035	 	 	$	2,229,727	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Borrowings	  	$	213,779	 	 	$	248,195	 	
Obligations under capital leases	  	 	54,500	 	 	 	54,500	 	
Intangible lease liabilities, net	  	 	44,713	 	 	 	32,697	 	
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	  	 	54,531	 	 	 	24,780	 	
Due to affiliates	  	 	10,188	 	 	 	15,975	 	
Dividends payable	  	 	11,179	 	 	 	6,046	 	
Deferred rental income	  	 	24,559	 	 	 	11,584	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	
Total liabilities	  	 	413,449	 	 	 	393,777	 	
 	 	 	
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	
 	 	 	
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Common shares, $.01 par value; 750,000,000 shares authorized, 396,036,430 shares issued and 389,829,812 outstanding at September 30, 2003, and 750,000,000 shares authorized, 217,790,874 shares issued and 215,699,717 shares outstanding at December 31, 2002	  	 	3,960	 	 	 	2,178	 	
Additional paid-in capital	  	 	3,527,007	 	 	 	1,929,381	 	
Cumulative distributions in excess of earnings	  	 	(140,315	)	 	 	(74,310	)	
Treasury stock, at cost, 6,206,618 shares at September 30, 2003 and 2,091,157 shares at December 31, 2002	  	 	(62,066	)	 	 	(20,912	)	
Other comprehensive loss	  	 	—  	 	 	 	(387	)	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	
Total shareholders’ equity	  	 	3,328,586	 	 	 	1,835,950	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	  	$	3,742,035	 	 	$	2,229,727	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	
 
See accompanying notes.
 
19

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
 	  	Three months ended
September 30,

	  	Nine months ended
September 30,

	
 	  	2003

	  	2002

	  	2003

	  	2002

	
REVENUES:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Rental income	  	$	79,884	  	$	27,549	  	$	202,196	  	$	66,121	
Tenant reimbursements	  	 	25,473	  	 	3,677	  	 	51,531	  	 	12,854	
Equity in income of joint ventures	  	 	1,101	  	 	1,259	  	 	3,493	  	 	3,738	
Interest income and other income	  	 	1,130	  	 	2,428	  	 	3,445	  	 	5,210	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	
 	  	 	107,588	  	 	34,913	  	 	260,665	  	 	87,923	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	
EXPENSES:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Depreciation	  	 	28,963	  	 	10,282	  	 	73,241	  	 	23,185	
Property operating costs	  	 	34,563	  	 	5,868	  	 	75,602	  	 	17,109	
Asset and property management and leasing fees	  	 	3,921	  	 	1,367	  	 	9,060	  	 	3,119	
Amortization of deferred leasing costs	  	 	895	  	 	78	  	 	1,244	  	 	229	
General and administrative	  	 	1,648	  	 	745	  	 	4,171	  	 	1,867	
Interest expense	  	 	3,778	  	 	1,288	  	 	11,178	  	 	2,593	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	
 	  	 	73,768	  	 	19,628	  	 	174,496	  	 	48,102	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	
NET INCOME	  	$	33,820	  	$	15,285	  	$	86,169	  	$	39,821	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	
EARNINGS PER SHARE	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Basic and diluted	  	$	0.10	  	$	0.09	  	$	0.30	  	$	0.31	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Basic and diluted	  	 	350,741	  	 	163,395	  	 	289,521	  	 	128,541	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE	  	$	0.18	  	$	0.18	  	$	0.53	  	$	0.57	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	
 
See accompanying notes.
 
20

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002
AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
 	  	Common Stock

	  	Additional
Paid-In
Capital

	 	 	Cumulative
Distributions
in Excess of
Earnings

	 	 	Retained
Earnings

	 	 	Treasury Stock

	 	  	Other
Comprehensive
Income

	 	  	Total
Shareholders’
Equity

	 	 	
 	  	Shares

	  	Amount

	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Shares

	  	Amount

	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
BALANCE, December 31, 2001	  	83,761	  	$	838	  	$	738,236	 	 	$	(24,181	)	 	$	—  	 	 	555	  	$	(5,550	)	  	 	—  	 	  	$	709,343	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Issuance of common stock	  	134,030	  	 	1,340	  	 	1,338,953	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	  	 	—  	 	  	 	1,340,293	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Treasury stock purchased	  	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	1,536	  	 	(15,362	)	  	 	—  	 	  	 	(15,362	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Dividends ($0.76 per share)	  	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	 	 	(50,129	)	 	 	(59,854	)	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	  	 	—  	 	  	 	(109,983	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Sales commissions and dealer manager fees	  	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	(127,332	)	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	  	 	—  	 	  	 	(127,332	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other offering costs	  	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	(20,476	)	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	  	 	—  	 	  	 	(20,476	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Components of comprehensive income:	  	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net income	  	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	59,854	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	  	 	—  	 	  	 	59,854	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Change in value of interest rate swap	  	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	  	 	(387	)	  	 	(387	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Comprehensive income	  	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	  	 	59,467	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	  	

	

	

	  	

	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
BALANCE, December 31, 2002	  	217,791	  	 	2,178	  	 	1,929,381	 	 	 	(74,310	)	 	 	—  	 	 	2,091	  	 	(20,912	)	  	 	(387	)	  	 	1,835,950	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Issuance of common stock	  	178,245	  	 	1,782	  	 	1,780,682	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	  	 	—  	 	  	 	1,782,464	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Treasury stock purchased	  	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	4,115	  	 	(41,154	)	  	 	—  	 	  	 	(41,154	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Dividends ($0.53 per share)	  	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	 	 	(66,005	)	 	 	(86,169	)	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	  	 	—  	 	  	 	(152,174	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Sales commissions and dealer manager fees	  	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	(168,312	)	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	  	 	—  	 	  	 	(168,312	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other offering costs	  	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	(14,744	)	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	  	 	—  	 	  	 	(14,744	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Components of comprehensive income:	  	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net income	  	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	86,169	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	  	 	—  	 	  	 	86,169	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Change in value of interest rate swap	  	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	  	 	387	 	  	 	387	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Comprehensive income	  	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	  	 	86,556	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	  	

	

	

	  	

	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
BALANCE, September 30, 2003	  	396,036	  	$	3,960	  	$	3,527,007	 	 	$	(140,315	)	 	$	—  	 	 	6,206	  	$	(62,066	)	  	$	—  	 	  	$	3,328,586	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	  	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	  	

	

	

	  	

	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 
See accompanying notes.
 
21

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
 
 	  	Nine Months Ended
September 30,

	 	
 	  	2003

	 	 	2002

	 	
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net income	  	$	86,169	 	 	$	39,821	 	
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Equity in income of joint ventures	  	 	(3,493	)	 	 	(3,738	)	
Depreciation	  	 	73,241	 	 	 	23,185	 	
Amortization of deferred financing costs	  	 	2,276	 	 	 	587	 	
Amortization of intangible lease assets/liabilities	  	 	(175	)	 	 	—  	 	
Amortization of deferred leasing costs	  	 	1,244	 	 	 	229	 	
Bad debt expense	  	 	—  	 	 	 	113	 	
Changes in assets and liabilities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Rents receivable	  	 	(16,568	)	 	 	(6,128	)	
Deferred rental income	  	 	12,975	 	 	 	7,232	 	
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	  	 	4,049	 	 	 	8,811	 	
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net	  	 	(10,006	)	 	 	(1,813	)	
Due to/from affiliates	  	 	548	 	 	 	(140	)	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	
Net cash provided by operating activities	  	 	150,260	 	 	 	68,159	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Investment in real estate assets	  	 	(1,032,853	)	 	 	(797,011	)	
Contributions to joint ventures	  	 	(24,056	)	 	 	—  	 	
Investment in intangible lease assets	  	 	(112,927	)	 	 	—  	 	
Deferred project costs paid	  	 	(65,013	)	 	 	(34,784	)	
Distributions received from joint ventures	  	 	7,655	 	 	 	5,301	 	
Deferred lease acquisition costs paid	  	 	(48,741	)	 	 	(400	)	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	
Net cash used in investing activities	  	 	(1,275,935	)	 	 	(826,894	)	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Proceeds from borrowings	  	 	649,298	 	 	 	27,742	 	
Repayment of borrowings	  	 	(796,061	)	 	 	(37	)	
Dividends paid to shareholders	  	 	(147,042	)	 	 	(71,397	)	
Issuance of common stock	  	 	1,782,464	 	 	 	988,470	 	
Treasury stock purchased	  	 	(41,154	)	 	 	(11,617	)	
Sales commissions and dealer manager fees paid	  	 	(165,558	)	 	 	(94,097	)	
Other offering costs paid	  	 	(16,471	)	 	 	(10,937	)	
Deferred financing costs paid	  	 	(4,624	)	 	 	(1,066	)	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	
Net cash provided by financing activities	  	 	1,260,852	 	 	 	827,061	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	  	 	135,177	 	 	 	68,326	 	
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period	  	 	45,464	 	 	 	75,586	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period	  	$	180,641	 	 	$	143,912	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	
 
See accompanying notes.
 
22

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
(unaudited)
 
1.	ORGANIZATION	
 
General
 
Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (“Wells REIT” or “Registrant”) is a Maryland corporation that qualifies as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”). Wells REIT was incorporated in 1997 and commenced operations on June 5, 1998.
 
Wells REIT engages in the acquisition and ownership of commercial real estate properties throughout the United States, including properties that are under construction, are newly constructed or have operating histories. At September 30, 2003, Wells REIT had invested in commercial office and industrial real estate assets, either directly or through joint ventures with real estate limited partnership programs sponsored by Wells Capital, Inc. (the “Advisor”) or its affiliates.
 
Wells REIT’s business is conducted through Wells Operating Partnership, L.P. (“Wells OP”), a Delaware limited partnership, and its subsidiaries, and Wells REIT-Independence Square, LLC (“Wells REIT-Independence”), a single member Georgia limited liability company. Wells OP was formed to acquire, develop, own, lease and operate properties on behalf of Wells REIT, directly, through wholly-owned subsidiaries or through joint ventures. Wells REIT-Independence was formed to acquire the NASA Buildings located in Washington, D.C. Wells REIT is the sole general partner in Wells OP and the sole member of Wells REIT-Independence and possesses full legal control and authority over the operations of Wells OP and Wells REIT-Independence. Wells OP, and its subsidiaries, and Wells REIT-Independence comprise Wells REIT’s subsidiaries.
 
Four offerings of Wells REIT stock have been initiated as follows:
 
Offering #

	  	Date Commenced

	  	Termination Date

	  	Gross Proceeds

	 	Shares Issued

	
1	  	January 30, 1998	  	December 19, 1999	  	$132.2 million	 	13.2 million	
2	  	December 20, 1999	  	December 19, 2000	  	$175.2 million	 	17.5 million	
3	  	December 20, 2000	  	July 26, 2002	  	$ 1,283.0 million	 	128.3 million	
4	  	July 26, 2002	  	Offering open	  	$ 2,370.0 million
(through September 30,
2003)	 	237.0 million
(through September 30,
2003)	
Total as of
September 30, 2003:	  	 	  	 	  	$ 3,960.4 million	 	396.0 million	
 
After incurring costs from all offerings of $136.4 million in acquisition and advisory fees and expenses, $374.7 million in selling commissions, $54.7 million in organization and offering expenses to the Advisor, investment in related real estate assets of $3,186.5 million and common stock redemptions pursuant to Wells REIT’s share redemption program of $62.1 million, Wells REIT was holding net offering proceeds of approximately $146.0 million available for investment in properties at September 30, 2003.
 
Wells REIT’s stock is not listed on a national exchange. However, the Wells REIT’s Articles of Incorporation currently require the Wells REIT to begin the process of liquidating its investments and distributing the resulting proceeds to the shareholders if its shares are not listed on a national exchange by January 30, 2008. Wells REIT’s Articles of Incorporation can only be amended by a proxy vote of Wells REIT’s shareholders.
 
23

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
Basis of Presentation
 
The consolidated financial statements of Wells REIT have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X, and do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the statements for the unaudited interim periods presented include all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary to present a fair presentation of the results for such periods. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of full year results. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes included in the Wells REIT’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
 
Income Taxes
 
Wells REIT has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and has operated as such beginning with its taxable year ended December 31, 1998. To qualify as a REIT, Wells REIT must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to currently distribute at least 90% of the REIT’s ordinary taxable income to shareholders. As a REIT, Wells REIT generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes to its shareholders. If Wells REIT fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will then be subject to federal income taxes on its taxable income for four years following the year during which qualification is lost, unless the Internal Revenue Service grants Wells REIT relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect Wells REIT’s net income and net cash available for distribution to shareholders. However, Wells REIT believes that it is organized and operates in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT and intends to continue to operate in the foreseeable future in such a manner that Wells REIT will remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. No provision for federal income taxes has been made in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, as Wells REIT made distributions in excess of its taxable income for the periods presented.
 
Reclassifications
 
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current period financial statement presentation.
 
Recent Pronouncements
 
Business Combinations / Goodwill and Intangibles
 
On January 1, 2002, Wells REIT adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 “Business Combinations,” (“FAS 141”) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 “ Goodwill and Intangibles”  (“FAS 142”). These standards govern business combinations, asset acquisitions and the accounting for acquired intangibles.
 
Upon the acquisition of real properties, it is Wells REIT’s policy to allocate the purchase price of properties to acquired tangible assets, consisting of land and building, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, and the value of in-place leases, based in each case on their fair values.
 
The fair values of the tangible assets of an acquired property (which includes land and building) are determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land and building based on management’s determination of the relative fair value of these assets. Management determines the as-if vacant fair value of a property using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers. Factors considered by management in performing these analyses include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses during the expected lease-up periods based on current market demand. Management estimates costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, and other related costs.
 
24

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
The fair values of above-market and below-market in-place leases are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the leases. The capitalized above-market and below-market lease values are amortized as an adjustment to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases.
 
The fair values of in-place leases include direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant, opportunity costs associated with lost rentals which are avoided by acquiring an in-place lease, and tenant relationships. Direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant include commissions, tenant improvements and other direct costs and are estimated based on management’s consideration of current market costs to execute a similar lease. These direct costs are included in deferred leasing costs in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are amortized to expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases. The value of opportunity costs is calculated using the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases over a market absorption period for a similar lease. Customer relationships are valued based on expected renewal of a lease or the likelihood of obtaining a particular tenant for other locations. These lease intangibles are included in intangible lease assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are amortized to rental income over the remaining term of the respective leases.
 
Variable Interest Entities
 
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,”  which clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51,  “Consolidated Financial Statements,”  relating to consolidation of certain entities. FIN 46 requires the identification of Wells REIT’s participation in variable interest entities (“VIEs”), which are defined as entities with a level of invested equity that is not sufficient to fund future activities to permit them to operate on a stand alone basis, or whose equity holders lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. For entities identified as VIEs, FIN 46 sets forth a model to evaluate potential consolidation based on an assessment of which party to the VIE, if any, bears a majority of the exposure to its expected losses, or stands to gain from a majority of its expected returns. FIN 46 is effective for all new VIEs created or acquired after January 31, 2003. For VIEs created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN 46 must be applied for the first interim or annual period ending after December 15, 2003. FIN 46 also sets forth certain disclosures regarding interests in VIEs that are deemed significant, even if consolidation is not required. As Wells REIT’s joint ventures do not fall under the definition of VIEs provided above, we do not believe that the adoption of FIN 46 will result in the consolidation of any previously unconsolidated entities.
 
Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity
 
In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement No. 150 “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity ” (“FAS 150”), certain components of which were deferred by the FASB in October 2003 for an indefinite period. This statement establishes standards for classifying and measuring as liabilities certain financial instruments that embody obligations of the issuer and have characteristics of both liabilities and equity. FAS 150 requires, among other things, that a minority interest in a consolidated entity be classified as a liability and reported at settlement value if an unconditional obligation to exercise or redeem the minority interest exists. As Wells OP is a finite life partnership, Wells REIT’s interest therein represents an unconditional obligation. Prior to its deferral, FAS 150 required this minority interest to be accounted for as a liability and reported at settlement value. Until further guidance is provided during the deferral period for FAS 150, this interest will continue to be recorded as minority interest in Wells REIT’s consolidated financial statements. The settlement value of this minority interest is believed to be an immaterial amount at September 30, 2003.
 
25

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
2.	REAL ESTATE ASSETS	
 
Acquisitions
 
During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, Wells REIT acquired ownership interests in fifteen properties for a total purchase price of approximately $1.3 billion, exclusive of related closing costs and acquisition and advisory fees paid to the Advisor, as described below.
 
East Point I & II
 
On January 9, 2003, Wells REIT purchased two three-story office buildings containing approximately 187,735 aggregate rentable square feet located in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, for a purchase price of approximately $22.0 million. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, The Austin Company, Danaher Power Solutions LLC and Moreland Management Company occupy approximately 93% of the rentable square feet in the two buildings. At closing, Wells REIT entered into an earn-out agreement that requires Wells REIT to pay the seller certain amounts for each new, fully-executed lease after the date of acquisition but on or before March 31, 2004, relating to the vacant space. Payments are calculated by dividing the anticipated first year’s annual rent less operating expenses by 0.105, with the result being reduced by tenant improvement costs related to the space. In July 2003, a payment of approximately $1.4 million resulted from an executed lease with a tenant for approximately 9,814 square feet. At September 30, 2003, approximately 3% of the building remains vacant and subject to the terms of the earn-out agreement.
 
150 West Jefferson Detroit
 
On March 31, 2003, Wells REIT purchased a 25-story office building containing approximately 505,417 rentable square feet located at 150 West Jefferson Avenue, downtown Detroit, Michigan, for a purchase price of approximately $93.8 million. The building is approximately 99% occupied under leases to various tenants with varying lease terms, including Miller, Canfield, Paddock, & Stone; Butzel Long PC; and MCN Energy Group, Inc., which collectively occupy approximately 62% of the building.
 
Citicorp Englewood Cliffs, NJ
 
On April 30, 2003, Wells REIT purchased the Citicorp Englewood Cliffs, NJ Building, a three-story office building containing approximately 410,000 rentable square feet located in Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, for a purchase price of $70.5 million. The building is leased entirely to Citicorp North America, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citicorp, Inc.
 
US Bancorp Minneapolis
 
On May 1, 2003, Wells REIT purchased the US Bancorp Minneapolis Building, a 32-story office building containing approximately 929,694 rentable square feet located in Minneapolis, Minnesota, for a purchase price of $174.0 million. The building is approximately 99% leased under leases to various tenants with varying terms, including US Bancorp Piper Jaffray Companies, Inc., which leases approximately 77% of the building.
 
AON Center Chicago
 
On May 9, 2003, Wells REIT purchased the AON Center Chicago Building, an 83-story office building containing approximately 2.6 million rentable square feet located in Chicago, Illinois, for a purchase price of approximately $465.2 million. The building is approximately 92% leased under leases to various tenants with varying lease terms, including BP Corporation North America, Inc., DDB & Needham Chicago, Inc., and Kirkland & Ellis which collectively lease approximately 54% of the building.
 
GMAC Detroit
 
On May 9, 2003, Wells REIT acquired the GMAC Detroit Building, a three-story office building containing approximately 119,122 square feet located in Auburn Hills, Michigan, for a purchase price of approximately $17.8 million. The building is approximately 86% leased to the General Motors Acceptance Corp. and Delmia Corp. For the remaining approximately 14% of the building, Wells REIT is required to pay the seller certain amounts for each new, fully executed lease entered into after the date of acquisition of the building but on or before November 8, 2004. Payments are calculated by dividing the sum of the anticipated first year’s annual rent less operating expenses by 0.095, with the result being reduced by tenant improvement costs related to the space.
 
26

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
IBM Reston I & II
 
On June 27, 2003, Wells REIT purchased the IBM Reston Buildings, one six-story and one two-story office building containing approximately 141,000 aggregate rentable square feet located in Reston, Virginia for a purchase price of approximately $28.6 million. The buildings are 100% occupied by the IBM Corporation and Tellabs Reston, Inc.
 
ISS Atlanta III
 
On July 1, 2003, Wells REIT purchased the third ISS Atlanta Building, a three-story office building containing approximately 50,400 rentable square feet located in Atlanta, Georgia for a purchase price of approximately $10.0 million. The building is 100% leased to ISS. The first two ISS Buildings were purchased in July 2002. The three-building project now totals approximately 289,000 rentable square feet.
 
Lockheed Martin Rockville
 
On July 30, 2003, Wells REIT purchased all of the membership interests in Meridian/Northwestern Shady Grove North, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, which owns two four-story office buildings containing approximately 231,000 aggregate rentable square feet located in Rockville, Maryland, for a purchase price of approximately $51.6 million. The buildings are 100% leased to Lockheed Martin.
 
Cingular Atlanta
 
On August 1, 2003, Wells REIT purchased the Cingular Atlanta Building, a 19-story office building containing approximately 413,300 rentable square feet located in Atlanta, Georgia, for a purchase price of approximately $83.9 million. The building is approximately 97% leased under leases to various tenants with varying terms, including Cingular Wireless, LLC, which leases approximately 76% of the building.
 
Aventis Northern NJ
 
On August 14, 2003, Wells REIT purchased the Aventis Northern NJ Building, an eight-story office building containing approximately 297,000 rentable square feet located in Bridgewater, New Jersey, for a purchase price of $96.3 million. The building is 100% leased to Aventis, Inc.
 
Applera Pasadena
 
On August 21, 2003, Wells REIT purchased the Applera Pasadena Building, a five-story office building containing approximately 176,000 rentable square feet located in Pasadena, California, for a purchase price of approximately $37.9 million. The building is approximately 76% leased under leases to various tenants with varying terms, including Paracel, Inc., which leases approximately 48% of the building.
 
Continental Casualty Orange County
 
On August 29, 2003, Wells REIT purchased the Continental Casualty Orange County Building, a three-story office building containing approximately 133,000 rentable square feet located in Brea, California, for a purchase price of approximately $25.6 million. The building is 100% leased under leases to various tenants with varying terms, including Continental Casualty Company, which leases approximately 84% of the building.
 
Polo Ralph Lauren Newark
 
On September 5, 2003, Wells REIT purchased the Polo Ralph Lauren Newark Building, a 10-story office building containing approximately 268,000 rentable square feet located in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, for a purchase price of approximately $46.6 million. The building is approximately 92% leased under leases to various tenants with varying terms, including Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, which leases approximately 60% of the building.
 
1901 Main Irvine
 
On September 17, 2003, Wells REIT purchased the 1901 Main Irvine Building, an eight-story office building containing approximately 172,000 rentable square feet located in Irvine, California, for a purchase price of approximately $45.5 million. The building is 100% leased under leases to various tenants with varying terms, including BNC Mortgage, Inc., which leases approximately 43% of the building.
 
27

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
Build-to-Suit Projects
 
During the nine month period ended September 30, 2003, Wells REIT completed three build-to-suit projects with a total investment amount of approximately $80.9 million, as discussed below.
 
Nissan
 
In March 2003, Wells REIT substantially completed the construction of the Nissan Building located in Dallas, Texas. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation occupied the building under a lease commencing on April 1, 2003. The construction was financed through a loan that was paid off in March 2003, when the building was substantially complete. As of September 30, 2003, investment in real estate related to this project totaled approximately $41.6 million.
 
AmeriCredit
 
In April 2003, Wells REIT substantially completed the construction of the AmeriCredit Building located in Phoenix, Arizona. AmeriCredit Corporation occupied the building under a lease commencing on April 15, 2003. The entire construction was financed completely with investor proceeds. As of September 30, 2003, investment in real estate related to this project totaled approximately $24.9 million.
 
Kerr-McGee
 
In June 2003, Wells REIT substantially completed the construction of the Kerr-McGee Building located in Houston, Texas. Kerr-McGee Corporation occupied the building under a lease commencing on July 1, 2003. The construction of this property was financed through a loan that was paid off in July 2003. As of September 30, 2003, investment in real estate related to this project totaled approximately $14.4 million.
 
3.	INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES	
 
Acquisitions
 
AIU Chicago
 
On September 19, 2003, Wells Fund XIII – REIT Joint Venture Partnership (“Wells Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture”), a joint venture partnership between Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. (“Wells Fund XIII”) and Wells OP, purchased a four-story office building on a 2.7 acre tract of land located at 5550 Prairie Stone Parkway in Hoffman Estates, Illinois (AIU Chicago Building) from Two Park Center, L.L.C. for a purchase price of approximately $26.3 million, plus closing costs.
 
Wells OP contributed approximately $24.0 million and Wells Fund XIII contributed $3 million to the Wells Fund XIII – REIT Joint Venture for their respective shares of the acquisition costs for the AIU Chicago Building. Subsequent to the acquisition of the AIU Chicago Building, Wells OP held an equity percentage interest in the Wells Fund XIII – REIT Joint Venture of approximately 71.9%.
 
Dispositions
 
On September 11, 2003, Wells/Orange County Associates (“Cort Joint Venture”), a joint venture partnership between Wells OP and Fund X and Fund XI Associates, sold a warehouse and office building containing approximately 52,000 rentable square feet located in Fountain Valley, California (“Cort Furniture Building”) for approximately a $5.8 million gross sales price.
 
Wells OP holds an approximately 43.6% equity percentage interest in the Cort Joint Venture. The net sale proceeds allocable to Wells OP as a result of the sale of the Cort Furniture Building were approximately $2.4 million. Wells OP’s share of the loss from the sale of the Cort Furniture Building was approximately $0.2 million.
 
28

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
The information below summarizes the operations of the seven unconsolidated joint ventures that Wells REIT, through Wells OP, had ownership interests in as of September 30, 2003.
 
CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
 	  	Three months
ended
September 30,

	  	Nine months
ended
September 30,

	
 	  	2003
(000s)

	 	 	2002
(000s)

	  	2003
(000s)

	 	 	2002
(000s)

	
REVENUES:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Rental income	  	$	5,005	 	 	$	4,480	  	$	14,888	 	 	$	13,669	
Tenant reimbursements	  	 	494	 	 	 	434	  	 	1,511	 	 	 	1,426	
Other income	  	 	2	 	 	 	11	  	 	12	 	 	 	34	

	

	

	 	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	

	

	
Total revenues	  	 	5,501	 	 	 	4,925	  	 	16,411	 	 	 	15,129	

	

	

	 	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	

	

	
EXPENSES:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Depreciation	  	 	1,785	 	 	 	1,562	  	 	5,228	 	 	 	4,664	
Operating expenses	  	 	802	 	 	 	597	  	 	2,693	 	 	 	1,899	
Management and leasing fees	  	 	303	 	 	 	279	  	 	933	 	 	 	812	

	

	

	 	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	

	

	
Total expenses	  	 	2,890	 	 	 	2,438	  	 	8,854	 	 	 	7,375	

	

	

	 	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	

	

	
NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS	  	 	2,611	 	 	 	2,487	  	 	7,557	 	 	 	7,754	

	

	

	 	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	

	

	
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Operating income	  	 	142	 	 	 	135	  	 	403	 	 	 	405	
Loss on disposition	  	 	(379	)	 	 	—  	  	 	(379	)	 	 	—  	

	

	

	 	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	

	

	
(LOSS) INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS	  	 	(237	)	 	 	135	  	 	24	 	 	 	405	

	

	

	 	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	

	

	
NET INCOME	  	$	2,374	 	 	$	2,622	  	$	7,581	 	 	$	8,159	

	

	

	 	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	

	

	
NET INCOME ALLOCATED TO WELLS REIT	  	$	1,101	 	 	$	1,259	  	$	3,493	 	 	$	3,738	

	

	

	 	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	

	

	
 
29

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
4.	BORROWINGS	
 
Wells REIT has financed certain investments, acquisitions and developments through various borrowings as described below. On September 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002, Wells REIT had the following amounts outstanding:
 
Facility

	  	September 30,
2003
(000s)

	  	December 31,
2002
(000s)

	
$110 million line of credit; accruing interest at LIBOR plus 175 basis points; requiring interest payments monthly with principal due at maturity; collateralized by various buildings (1)	  	$	—  	  	$	58,000	
$98.1 million line of credit; accruing interest at LIBOR plus 175 basis points (2.87% at September 30, 2003); requiring interest payments monthly and principal due at maturity (March 2004); collateralized by various buildings	  	 	—  	  	 	61,399	
$500 million unsecured revolving line of credit; accruing interest at various rates of interest based on LIBOR plus up to 1.625% (2.75% at September 30, 2003); requiring interest payments monthly and principal payments due at maturity (April 2005) (2)	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	
$50 million line of credit; accruing interest at LIBOR plus 175 basis points (2.87% at September 30, 2003); requiring interest payments monthly with principal due at maturity (June 2005); collateralized by various buildings (3)	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	
$90 million note payable; accruing interest at LIBOR plus 115 basis points; currently locked at 2.27% through October 2, 2003 (2.27% at September 30, 2003); requiring interest payments monthly, with principal due at maturity (December 2006); subject to certain prepayment penalties; collateralized by the Nestle Building	  	 	90,000	  	 	90,000	
$112.3 million note payable; seller financed interest free loan obtained upon purchase of AON Center in May 2003; Principal balance due upon maturity (January 2004); collateralized by the AON Center Building (4)	  	 	112,347	  	 	—  	
$34.2 million construction loan payable; accruing interest at LIBOR plus 200 basis points; requiring interest payments monthly and principal due at maturity collateralized by the Nissan Building (5)	  	 	—  	  	 	23,149	
$13.7 million construction loan payable; accruing interest at LIBOR plus 200 basis points; requiring interest payments monthly, with principal due at maturity; collateralized by the Kerr-McGee Building (6)	  	 	—  	  	 	4,038	
$8.8 million note payable; accruing interest at 8.0%; requiring interest and principal payments monthly with any unamortized principal due at maturity (December 2003); subject to certain prepayment penalties; collateralized by the BMG Buildings	  	 	8,532	  	 	8,709	
$2.9 million note payable; accruing interest at 8.5%; requiring interest payments monthly with principal due at maturity (December 2003); subject to certain prepayment penalties; collateralized by the BMG Buildings	  	 	2,900	  	 	2,900	

	

	  	

	

	
Total borrowings	  	$	213,779	  	$	248,195	

	

	  	

	

	

(1)	Wells REIT terminated this credit facility upon execution of the $500 million line of credit in April 2003.	
(2)	Wells REIT entered into this revolving credit facility in April 2003. Additionally, Wells REIT is required to pay a quarterly facility fee of 0.25% per annum on the entire amount of the credit facility.	
(3)	Wells REIT entered into this credit agreement in June 2003.	
(4)	Interest is imputed at Wells REIT’s weighted average borrowing rate on the date of the acquisition.	
(5)	Wells REIT repaid this loan in March 2003, upon substantial completion of the construction of the property. At that time, Wells REIT terminated the interest rate swap at a cost of $0.3 million, which was reclassified from other comprehensive income to interest expense.	
(6)	Wells REIT repaid this loan in July 2003, upon substantial completion of the construction of the property and expiration of the related interest rate swap agreement.	
 
30

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
5.	RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS	
 
Advisory Agreement
 
Wells REIT has entered into an Advisory Agreement with the Advisor, which entitles the Advisor to specified fees in consideration for certain services with regard to the offering of shares to the public and investment of funds in real estate projects. The current Advisory Agreement expires January 30, 2004.
 
Under the terms of the agreement, the Advisor receives the following fees and reimbursements:
 
 	•	Acquisition and advisory fees and acquisition expenses of 3.5% of gross offering proceeds, subject to certain limitations;	
 
 	•	Reimbursement of organization and offering costs paid on behalf of Wells REIT, not to exceed 3% of gross offering proceeds;	
 
 	•	Disposition fee of 50% of the lesser of a competitive real estate commission or 3% of the sales price of the property, subordinated to the payment of dividends to shareholders equal to the sum of the shareholders’ invested capital plus an 8% return on invested capital;	
 
 	•	Incentive fee of 10% of net sales proceeds remaining after shareholders have received distributions equal to the sum of the shareholders’ invested capital plus an 8% return of invested capital; and	
 
 	•	Listing fee of 10% of the excess by which the market value of the stock plus dividends paid prior to listing exceeds the sum of 100% of the invested capital plus an 8% return on invested capital.	
 
The Advisor has elected, but is not obligated, to reduce the acquisition and advisory fees by the amounts attributable to shares redeemed under the share redemption program for shares redeemed through September 30, 2003.
 
Acquisition and advisory fees and acquisition expenses incurred for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, totaled $25.5 million and $12.8 million, respectively. Organizational and offering costs incurred for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, totaled $4.2 million and $4.8 million, respectively.
 
Acquisition and advisory fees and acquisition expenses incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, totaled $61.0 million and $34.2 million, respectively. Organizational and offering costs incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, totaled $14.7 million and $10.2 million, respectively. Wells REIT incurred no disposition, incentive or listing fees during the nine months ended September 30, 2003 or 2002.
 
Administrative Services Reimbursement
 
Wells REIT has no direct employees. The employees of the Advisor and Wells Management Company, Inc. (“Wells Management”), an affiliate of the Advisor, perform a full range of real estate services including leasing and property management, accounting, asset management and investor relations for Wells REIT. The related expenses are allocated among Wells REIT and the various Wells Real Estate Funds based on time spent on each entity by individual administrative personnel. These expenses are included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income. These expenses totaled $1.2 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Administrative services reimbursements totaled $3.2 million and $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
 
Asset and Property Management Agreement
 
Wells REIT has entered into an asset and property management agreement with Wells Management. In consideration for asset management services and for supervising the management and leasing of Wells REIT’s properties, Wells REIT will pay asset and property management fees to Wells Management equal to the lesser of (a) 4.5% of the gross revenues generally paid over the life of the lease or (b) 0.6% of the net asset value of the properties (excluding vacant properties) owned by Wells REIT. These asset and property management fees are calculated on an annual basis. These
 
31

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
expenses totaled $3.9 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $9.0 million and $3.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Additionally, a separate competitive fee for the one-time initial lease-up of newly constructed properties is generally paid in conjunction with the receipt of the first month’s rent. These costs totaled approximately $0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003.
 
Dealer Manager Agreement
 
Wells REIT has entered into a dealer manager agreement with Wells Investment Securities, Inc. (“WIS”), an affiliate of the Advisor, whereby WIS performs the dealer manager function for Wells REIT. For these services, WIS earns fees of 7% of the gross proceeds from the sale of the shares of Wells REIT, most of which are reallowed to participating broker-dealers. Additionally, WIS earns a dealer manager fee of 2.5% of the gross offering proceeds at the time the shares are sold, of which up to 1.5% may be reallowed to participating broker-dealers. WIS has elected, although is not obligated, to reduce the dealer manager fee by 2.5% of the gross redemptions under Wells REIT’s share redemption plan for shares redeemed through September 30, 2003. During the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, Wells REIT incurred commissions of $51.7 million and $26.4 million, respectively, of which more than 99% were reallowed to participating broker-dealers. Dealer manager fees of $18.2 million and $9.1 million were incurred for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Of these amounts, $8.7 million and $4.0 million were reallowed to participating broker-dealers for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, Wells REIT incurred commissions of $124.8 million and $69.7 million, respectively, of which more than 99% was reallowed to participating broker-dealers. Dealer manager fees of $43.5 million and $24.4 million were incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002. Of these amounts, $20.8 million and $11.1 million were reallowed to participating broker-dealers.
 
Due From Affiliates
 
Due from affiliates included in the consolidated balance sheets represents Wells REIT’s share of the cash to be distributed from its joint venture investments and other amounts payable to Wells REIT from other related parties.
 
Conflicts of Interest
 
The Advisor also is a general partner in various Wells Real Estate Funds. As such, there are conflicts of interest where the Advisor, while serving in the capacity as general partner for Wells Real Estate Funds, may be in competition with Wells REIT in connection with property acquisitions or for tenants in similar geographic markets.
 
Additionally, certain members of the board of Wells REIT also serve on the board of another REIT sponsored by the Advisor and will encounter certain conflicts of interest regarding investment and operating decisions.
 
6.	CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION	
 
 	  	For the nine months
ended September 30,

	
 	  	2003

	  	2002

	
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Deferred project costs applied to investments	  	$	56,722	  	$	31,271	

	

	  	

	

	
Deferred project costs due to affiliate	  	$	3,647	  	$	587	

	

	  	

	

	
Other offering costs due to affiliate	  	$	6,545	  	$	3,537	

	

	  	

	

	
Sales commissions payable	  	$	7,509	  	$	1,773	

	

	  	

	

	
Acquisition of intangible lease liability	  	$	15,980	  	$	—  	

	

	  	

	

	
Dividends payable	  	$	11,179	  	$	5,761	

	

	  	

	

	
Joint venture distributions applied to investment	  	$	8,325	  	$	6,185	

	

	  	

	

	
Seller financed debt arrangement obtained at acquisition of property	  	$	112,347	  	$	—  	

	

	  	

	

	
Other liabilities assumed at acquisition of property	  	$	19,064	  	$	32,500	

	

	  	

	

	
Accrued capital expenditures	  	$	3,886	  	$	2,871	

	

	  	

	

	
 
32

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
7.	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	
 
Take Out Purchase and Escrow Agreement
 
The Advisor and its affiliates have developed a program (the “Wells Section 1031 Program”) involving the acquisition by a subsidiary of Wells Management Company (“Wells Exchange”) of income-producing commercial properties and the formation of a series of single member limited liability companies for the purpose of facilitating the resale of co-tenancy interests in such real estate properties to be owned in co-tenancy arrangements with persons (“1031 Participants”) who are seeking to invest the proceeds from a sale of real estate held for investment in another real estate investment for purposes of qualifying for like-kind exchange treatment under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Service Code. The acquisition of each of the properties acquired by Wells Exchange will be financed by a combination of permanent first mortgage financing and interim loan financing obtained from institutional lenders.
 
Following the acquisition of each property, Wells Exchange will attempt to sell co-tenancy interests to 1031 Participants, the proceeds of which will be used to repay a prorata portion of the interim financing. In consideration for the payment of a take out fee to Wells REIT and following approval of the potential property acquisition by Wells REIT’s board of directors, it is anticipated that Wells REIT will enter into a take out purchase and escrow agreement or similar contract providing that, if Wells Exchange is unable to sell all of the co-tenancy interests in that particular property to 1031 Participants, Wells REIT will purchase, at Wells Exchange’s cost, any co-tenancy interests remaining unsold at the end of the offering period.
 
In consideration for the payment of a take out fee in the amount of approximately $0.2 million, on December 31, 2002, Wells OP entered into a take out purchase and escrow agreement providing, among other things, that Wells OP would be obligated to acquire, at Wells Exchange’s cost ($0.4 million in cash plus $0.4 million of assumed debt for each 2.9994% interest of co-tenancy interest unsold), any unsold co-tenancy interests in two buildings known as Meadow Brook Corporate Park located in Birmingham, Alabama, which remain unsold at the expiration of the offering of Wells Exchange on September 30, 2003.
 
Wells OP’s maximum economic exposure in the transaction was initially $14.0 million in cash plus assumption of the first mortgage financing in the amount of $13.9 million. As of September 30, 2003, all co-tenancy interests had been sold, and Wells OP has no remaining economic exposure as a result of this transaction.
 
Letters of Credit
 
At September 30, 2003, Wells REIT had two unused letters of credit totaling approximately $14.9 million outstanding from financial institutions, consisting of letters of credit of approximately $14.5 million and $0.4 million with expiration dates of February 28, 2004 and February 2, 2004, respectively. These amounts are not recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2003 or December 31, 2002. These letters of credit were required by two unrelated parties to ensure completion of Wells REIT’s obligations under certain earn-out and construction agreements. Wells REIT does not anticipate a need to draw on these letters of credit.
 
Commitments Under Existing Lease Agreements
 
Certain lease agreements include provisions that, at the option of the tenant, Wells REIT may be obligated to expend certain amounts of capital to expand an existing property, construct on adjacent property or provide other expenditures for the benefit of the tenant, in favor of additional rental revenue. At September 30, 2003, no tenants have exercised such options.
 
Earn-out Agreements
 
As part of the acquisition of the IRS Building, Wells REIT entered into an agreement to pay the seller an additional $14.5 million if Wells REIT or the seller locates a suitable tenant and leases the vacant space of the building within 18 months after the date of acquisition of the property, or March 2004. If the space is not leased within this time, Wells REIT is released from any obligation to pay this additional purchase consideration. The 26% of the building that was vacant at the time of acquisition remains unleased at September 30, 2003. As of September 30, 2003, no payments have been made under this agreement.
 
33

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
In connection with the acquisition of the East Point I and II Buildings, Wells REIT entered into an earn-out agreement relating to approximately 15,000 square feet whereby Wells REIT is required to pay the seller certain amounts for each new, fully executed lease after the date of acquisition of the property but on or before June 30, 2004. Payments shall be the anticipated first year’s annual rent less operating expenses with the sum divided by 0.105 and the result reduced by tenant improvement costs related to the space. As of September 30, 2003, payments totaling $1.4 million have been made under this agreement and approximately 6,000 square feet remain subject to the agreement.
 
As part of the acquisition of the GMAC Detroit Building, Wells REIT entered into an agreement to pay the seller certain amounts for each new, fully executed lease entered into after the date of acquisition of the building but on or before November 8, 2004. Payments are calculated by dividing the sum of the anticipated first year’s annual rent less operating expenses by 0.095, with the result being reduced by tenant improvement costs related to the space. As of September 30, 2003, no payments have been made under this agreement.
 
Leasehold Property Obligations
 
The ASML, Motorola Tempe, Avnet and Bellsouth Ft. Lauderdale Buildings are subject to certain ground leases with expiration dates of 2082, 2082, 2083 and 2049, respectively.
 
Pending Litigation
 
In the normal course of business, Wells REIT may become subject to litigation or claims.
 
In November 2002, Wells REIT contracted to purchase an office building located in Ramsey County, Minnesota, from Shoreview Associates LLC (“Shoreview”), who filed a lawsuit against Wells REIT in Minnesota state court alleging that Shoreview was entitled to approximately $0.8 million in earnest money Wells REIT had deposited under the contract. Wells REIT has filed a counterclaim in the case asserting that Wells REIT is entitled to the earnest money deposit. Procedurally, Wells REIT had the case transferred to U.S. District Court in Minnesota, and Shoreview has moved to transfer the case back to state court. The dispute currently remains in litigation. After consultation with legal counsel, management does not believe that a reserve for a loss contingency is necessary.
 
NASD Enforcement Action
 
On August 26, 2003, Wells Investment Securities, the Wells REIT Dealer Manager, and Leo F. Wells, III, President and a director of Wells REIT, settled an NASD enforcement action against them by entering into a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (“AWC”) with the NASD which contained findings by the NASD including that WIS and Mr. Wells had violated certain of its Conduct Rules related to providing non-cash compensation of more than $100 to associated persons of NASD member firms in connection with their attendance at the annual educational conferences sponsored by WIS in 2001 and 2002, and that WIS and Mr. Wells failed to adhere to all the terms of a written undertaking made in March 2001. WIS consented to a censure and Mr. Wells consented to suspension from acting in a principal capacity with a member firm for one year. WIS and Mr. Wells also agreed to the imposition of a joint and several fine in the amount of $150,000. Wells REIT does not expect any material impact on the financial position or results of operations of Wells REIT as a result of this settlement.
 
8.	SUBSEQUENT EVENTS	
 
Sale of Shares of Common Stock
 
From October 1, 2003 through October 31, 2003, Wells REIT had raised approximately $243.2 million through the issuance of approximately 24.3 million shares of common stock of Wells REIT. As of October 31, 2003, approximately $505.2 million in shares (50.5 million shares) remained available for sale to the public under the fourth offering, exclusive of shares available under Wells REIT’s dividend reinvestment plan.
 
34

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
Status of our Share Redemption Program
 
Wells REIT’s share redemption program allowed for the redemption of approximately 4.37 million shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $43.7 million for the year ending December 31, 2003. From January 1, 2003 through October 31, 2003, Wells REIT had redeemed the entire 4.37 million shares of common stock available for redemption for the year at an aggregate cost of approximately $43.7 million and, accordingly, there are no remaining shares available for redemption for the year ending December 31, 2003. Requests for potential redemption will not be eligible for redemption until after January 1, 2004, subject, in all cases, to the board’s ability to change or terminate our share redemption program at any time in its discretion.
 
Legal Proceedings
 
On October 9, 2003, Stephen L. Flood, the Luzerne County Controller, and the Luzerne County Retirement Board (“Luzerne Board”) on behalf of the Luzerne County Employee Retirement System (“Plan”) filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania against 26 separate defendants including the Wells REIT, Wells Investment Securities, Inc., the dealer manager, and Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc., the parent company of both the Advisor and Wells Investment Securities, Inc. (“Wells Defendants”). The complaint alleges, among other things, (1) that certain former members of the Luzerne Board named as defendants invested $10 million in the Wells REIT on behalf of the Plan, (2) that certain former board member defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Plan by, among other things, permitting the investment of the Plan’s funds in investments not suitable for the Plan because they were long-term illiquid investments, permitting the Plan to pay excessive fees and commissions to co-defendants, and accepting political contributions in exchange for awarding advisory and management agreements, (3) that the Wells Defendants and others knew or should have known that the investment, and the fees and commissions associated with the investment, was not a proper investment for the Plan because it was a long-term illiquid investment, (4) that the Wells Defendants and others knew or should have known that certain Luzerne Board members and certain investment advisors and managers were breaching their fiduciary duties to the Plan, (5) that the defendants engaged in and conspired to engage in an improver scheme to intentionally defraud the Plan, and (6) that the investment was not approved by a majority of the Luzerne Board at a public meeting and, consequently, the investment was an inappropriate and void action. The Plan is seeking damages of not less than $25 million, treble damages and punitive damages from all defendants on a joint and several liability basis. The Wells REIT believes that this lawsuit is without merit with respect to the Wells Defendants. While it is too early to determine the likely outcome of this lawsuit, after consultation with legal counsel, management does not believe that a reserve for a loss contingency is necessary.
 
Property Acquisitions
 
IBM Portland
 
On October 9, 2003, Wells REIT purchased four multi-story office buildings and one industrial building containing approximately 364,000 aggregate rentable square feet on an approximately 20.9-acre tract of land (the “IBM Portland Buildings”) and an additional adjacent 31.8-acre tract of land in Beaverton, Oregon, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $38.2 million, plus closing costs. Three of the five IBM Portland Buildings contain approximately 220,000 aggregate rentable square feet, are entirely leased under three separate net leases to IBM. The remaining two buildings contain approximately 144,000 aggregate rentable square footage are currently vacant.
 
Leo Burnett Chicago
 
On November 6, 2003, Wells 35 W. Wacker, LLC, a single member Delaware limited liability company wholly owned by Wells OP, purchased a 97.9396% general partnership interest in VV City-Buck Venture, L.P. (“VV City”), a Delaware limited partnership, which is the owner of a 96.5007% general partnership interest in 35 W. Wacker Venture, L.P. (“Wacker Venture”), which owns a 50-story office building containing approximately 1.1 million aggregate rentable square feet at 35 W. Wacker Drive in Chicago, Illinois (“Leo Burnett Chicago Building”) for a purchase price of approximately $267.5 million, plus closing costs. As a result of this two-tier partnership structure, Wells OP indirectly acquired a 94.5124% interest in the Leo Burnett Chicago Building. Wells OP received a credit
 
35

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
against the purchase price at closing in the amount of approximately $139.3 million representing its pro rata portion of the existing indebtedness against the Leo Burnett Chicago Building in the amount of approximately $147.4 million. The purchaser received a credit against the purchase price at closing for Wells OP’s pro rata portion of existing indebtedness against the Leo Burnett Chicago Building in the amount of approximately $139.3 million. Buck 35 Wacker, L.L.C. retained a 2.0604% limited partnership interest in VV City, and Leo Burnett USA, Inc. retained a 3.4993% limited partnership interest in Wacker Venture. The Leo Burnett Chicago Building is primarily leased to The Leo Burnett Company and Winston & Strawn, which lease approximately 96% of the Leo Burnett Chicago Building, and various other tenants which lease an additional 2% of the Leo Burnett Chicago Building. Approximately 2% of the Leo Burnett Building is currently vacant.
 
36

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
 
SUMMARY OF UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
This pro forma information should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland Corporation (the “Wells REIT”), included in its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. In addition, this pro forma information should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes of certain acquired properties included in various Form 8-Ks previously filed.
 
The following unaudited pro forma balance sheet as of September 30, 2003 has been prepared to give effect to the fourth quarter 2003 acquisitions of the IBM Portland Buildings (the “Other Recent Acquisition”), the 4250 N. Fairfax Arlington Building and the Wells Washington Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation qualifying as a real estate investment trust that commenced operations on September 17, 2002, by Wells Operating Partnership, L.P. (“Wells OP”) and the Leo Burnett Chicago Building (collectively, the “Recent Acquisitions”) by Wells 35 W. Wacker, LLC, of which Wells OP is the sole member, as if the acquisitions occurred on September 30, 2003.
 
Wells OP is a Delaware limited partnership that was organized to own and operate properties on behalf of Wells REIT. As the sole general partner of Wells OP, Wells REIT possesses full legal control and authority over the operations of Wells OP. Accordingly, the accounts of Wells OP are consolidated with those of Wells REIT.
 
The following unaudited pro forma statement of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 has been prepared to give effect to the first quarter 2003 acquisitions of the East Point Cleveland Buildings and the 150 West Jefferson Detroit Building, the second quarter 2003 acquisitions of the Citicorp Englewood Cliffs, NJ Building, the US Bancorp Minneapolis Building, the Aon Center Chicago Building, the GMAC Detroit Building and the IBM Reston Buildings, the third quarter 2003 acquisitions of the ISS Atlanta III Building, the Lockheed Martin Rockville Buildings, the Cingular Atlanta Building, the Applera Pasadena Building, the Continental Casualty Orange County Building, the Polo Ralph Lauren Newark Building, the Aventis Northern NJ Building, the 1901 Main Irvine Building and the AIU Chicago Building (collectively, the “2003 Acquisitions”), the Other Recent Acquisition, the Leo Burnett Chicago Building, the 4250 North Fairfax Arlington Building, and the disposition of the Cort Furniture Building as if the acquisitions and disposition occurred on January 1, 2002. The unaudited pro forma statement of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 has been prepared to give effect to the acquisition of Wells Washington Properties, Inc. as if the acquisition occurred on September 17, 2002.
 
The following unaudited pro forma statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2002 has been prepared to give effect to the 2002 acquisition of the Vertex Sarasota Building (formerly, the Arthur Andersen Building), the Transocean Houston Building, the Novartis Atlanta Building, the Dana Corporation Buildings, the Travelers Express Denver Buildings, the Agilent Atlanta Building, the BellSouth Ft. Lauderdale Building, the Experian/TRW Buildings, the Agilent Boston Building, the TRW Denver Building, the MFS Phoenix Building, the ISS Atlanta Buildings, the PacifiCare San Antonio Building, the BMG Greenville Buildings, the Kraft Atlanta Building, the Nokia Dallas Buildings, the Harcourt Austin Building, the IRS Long Island Buildings, the KeyBank Parsippany Building, the Allstate Indianapolis Building, the Federal Express Colorado Springs Building, the EDS Des Moines Building, the Intuit Dallas Building, the Daimler Chrysler Dallas Building, the NASA Buildings, the Caterpillar Nashville Building, the Capital One Richmond Buildings, the John Wiley Indianapolis Building and the Nestle Los Angeles Building (collectively, the “2002 Acquisitions”), the 2003 Acquisitions, Other Recent Acquisition, the Leo Burnett Chicago Building, the 4250 North Fairfax Arlington Building, and the disposition of the Cort Furniture Building as if the acquisitions and disposition occurred on January 1, 2002. The unaudited pro forma statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2002 has been prepared to give effect to the acquisition of Wells Washington Properties, Inc. as if the acquisition occurred on September 17, 2002. The Kerr McGee Property, the AmeriCredit Phoenix Property, the ISS Atlanta III Building and the Continental Casualty Orange County Building had no operations during the year ended December 31, 2002.
 
These unaudited pro forma financial statements are prepared for informational purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of future results or of actual results that would have been achieved had the 2002 Acquisitions, the 2003 Acquisitions, the Recent Acquisitions and the disposition of the Cort Furniture Building been consummated as of January 1, 2002. In addition, the pro forma balance sheet includes allocations of the purchase price for certain acquisitions based upon preliminary estimates of the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired. Therefore, these allocations may be adjusted in the future upon finalization of these preliminary estimates.
 
37

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
 
PRO FORMA BALANCE SHEET
 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
 
(in thousands, except share amounts)
 
(Unaudited)
 
ASSETS
 
 	  	Wells Real
Estate
Investment
Trust, Inc. (a)

	  	Pro Forma Adjustments

	 	 	Pro Forma
Total

	 	
 	  	 	  	Recent Acquisitions

	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	  	 	  	Other

	 	 	Leo Burnett
Chicago

	 	 	4250 N. Fairfax
Arlington

	 	 	Wells Washington
Properties

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
REAL ESTATE ASSETS, at cost:	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Land	  	$	393,014	  	$	9,437	(b)	 	$	53,921	(b)	 	$	13,100	(b)	 	$	76,350	(b)	 	$	549,508	 	 	 	 	
 	  	 	 	  	 	386	(c)	 	 	1,047	(c)	 	 	536	(c)	 	 	1,717	(c)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Buildings, less accumulated depreciation of $136,835 at September 30, 2003	  	 	2,777,415	  	 	23,141	(b)	 	 	176,540	(b)	 	 	58,382	(b)	 	 	134,570	(b)	 	 	3,179,666	 	 	 	 	
 	  	 	 	  	 	947	(c)	 	 	3,261	(c)	 	 	2,390	(c)	 	 	3,020	(c)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Intangible Lease Assets, Net	  	 	120,873	  	 	3,065	(b)	 	 	44,626	(b)	 	 	15,569	(b)	 	 	35,886	(b)	 	 	222,457	 	 	 	 	
 	  	 	 	  	 	126	(c)	 	 	870	(c)	 	 	637	(c)	 	 	805	(c)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Construction in progress	  	 	943	  	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	943	 	 	 	 	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	
Total real estate assets	  	 	3,292,245	  	 	37,102	 	 	 	280,265	 	 	 	90,614	 	 	 	252,348	 	 	 	3,952,574	 	 	 	 	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	
INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES	  	 	104,098	  	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	104,098	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	  	 	180,641	  	 	(38,435	)(b)	 	 	6,250	(b)	 	 	(90,943	)(b)	 	 	1,402	(b)	 	 	113,425	 	 	 	 	
 	  	 	 	  	 	340,318	(d)	 	 	(132,133	)(b)	 	 	 	 	 	 	(140,292	)(b)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	  	 	 	  	 	(13,383	)(e)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
RENT RECEIVABLE	  	 	35,889	  	 	0	 	 	 	17,994	(b)	 	 	0	 	 	 	1,774	(b)	 	 	55,657	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
DEFERRED PROJECT COSTS	  	 	5,724	  	 	(1,573	)(c)	 	 	(5,410	)(c)	 	 	(3,722	)(c)	 	 	(5,744	)(c)	 	 	2,658	 	 	 	 	
 	  	 	 	  	 	13,383	(e)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
DUE FROM AFFILIATES	  	 	2,083	  	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	2,083	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER ASSETS, NET	  	 	17,657	  	 	0	 	 	 	3,001	(b)	 	 	0	 	 	 	82	(b)	 	 	20,755	 	 	 	 	
 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	15	(c)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
DEFERRED LEASE ACQUISITION COSTS, NET	  	 	49,198	  	 	2,792	(b)	 	 	11,211	(b)	 	 	3,892	(b)	 	 	8,971	(b)	 	 	76,755	 	 	 	 	
 	  	 	 	  	 	114	(c)	 	 	217	(c)	 	 	159	(c)	 	 	201	(c)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
INVESTMENT IN BONDS	  	 	54,500	  	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	54,500	 	 	 	 	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	
Total assets	  	$	3,742,035	  	$	340,318	 	 	$	181,410	 	 	$	0	 	 	$	118,742	 	 	$	4,382,505	 	 	 	 	

	

	  	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	

38

Table of Contents
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
(in thousands, except share amounts)
 
 	  	Wells Real
Estate
Investment
Trust, Inc. (a)

	 	 	Pro Forma Adjustments

	 	 	Pro Forma
Total

	 	 	
 	  	 	 	 	Recent Acquisitions

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	  	 	 	 	Other

	 	 	Leo Burnett
Chicago

	 	 	4250 N. Fairfax
Arlington

	    	Wells Washington
Properties

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
LIABILITIES:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	    	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Borrowings	  	$	213,779	 	 	$	0	 	 	$	162,495	(b)	 	$	0	    	$	115,167	(b)	 	$	491,441	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Obligations under capital lease	  	 	54,500	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	    	 	0	 	 	 	54,500	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Intangible lease liability	  	 	44,713	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	    	 	0	 	 	 	44,713	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	  	 	54,531	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	18,907	(b)	 	 	0	    	 	3,492	(b)	 	 	76,930	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Due to affiliate	  	 	10,188	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	    	 	0	 	 	 	10,188	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Dividends payable	  	 	11,179	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	    	 	0	 	 	 	11,179	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Deferred rental income	  	 	24,559	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	8	(b)	 	 	0	    	 	83	(b)	 	 	24,650	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	    	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total liabilities	  	 	413,449	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	181,410	 	 	 	0	    	 	118,742	 	 	 	713,601	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	    	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	    	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	    	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Common shares, $.01 par value; 750,000,000 shares authorized, 396,036,430 shares issued and 389,829,812 outstanding at September 30, 2003	  	 	3,960	 	 	 	382	(d)	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	    	 	0	 	 	 	4,342	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Additional paid in capital	  	 	3,527,007	 	 	 	339,936	(d)	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	    	 	0	 	 	 	3,866,943	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cumulative distributions in excess of earnings	  	 	(140,315	)	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	    	 	0	 	 	 	(140,315	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Treasury stock, at cost, 6,206,618 shares at September 30, 2003	  	 	(62,066	)	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	    	 	0	 	 	 	(62,066	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other comprehensive loss	  	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	    	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	    	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total shareholders’ equity	  	 	3,328,586	 	 	 	340,318	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	    	 	0	 	 	 	3,668,904	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	    	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	  	$	3,742,035	 	 	$	340,318	 	 	$	181,410	 	 	$	0	    	$	118,742	 	 	$	4,382,505	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	    	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	

(a)	Historical financial information derived from quarterly report on Form 10-Q.	
(b)	Reflects Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.’s purchase price for the assets, land, building and liabilities assumed, net of any purchase price adjustments.	
(c)	Reflects deferred project costs applied to the land and building at approximately 4.094% of the cash paid for purchase.	
(d)	Reflects capital raised through issuance of additional shares subsequent to September 30, 2003 through Wells Washington, Properties acquisition date, net of organizational and offering costs, commissions and dealer-manager fees.	
(e)	Reflects deferred project costs capitalized as a result of additional capital raised described in note (d) above.	
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
 
39

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
 
PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF INCOME
 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002
 
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
(Unaudited)
 
 	 	Wells Real
Estate
Investment
Trust, Inc. (a)

	 	Pro Forma Adjustments

	 	 	Pro Forma
Total

	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Recent Acquisitions

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	2002
Acquisitions

	 	 	2003
Acquisitions

	 	 	Other

	 	 	Leo Burnett
Chicago

	 	 	4250 N. Fairfax
Arlington

	 	 	Wells
Washington
Properties

	 	 	Dispositions

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
REVENUES:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Rental income	 	$	107,526	 	$	 101,006	(b)	 	$	 97,310 	(b)	 	$	 2,671 	(b)	 	$	 21,519 	(b)	 	$	 1,915 	(b)	 	$	 4,644 	(b)	 	$	0	 	 	$	336,591	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Tenant reimbursements	 	 	18,992	 	 	9,584	(c)	 	 	56,686 	(c)	 	 	2,138 	(c)	 	 	19,017 	(c)	 	 	2,281 	(c)	 	 	37	(c)	 	 	0	 	 	 	108,735	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Equity in income of joint ventures	 	 	4,700	 	 	588	(d)	 	 	(1,130	) (d)	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	(237	) (i)	 	 	3,921	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Lease termination income	 	 	1,409	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	1,409	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Interest and other income	 	 	7,001	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	7,001	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	139,628	 	 	111,178	 	 	 	152,866	 	 	 	4,809	 	 	 	40,536	 	 	 	4,196	 	 	 	4,681	 	 	 	(237	)	 	 	457,657	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	
EXPENSES:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Depreciation	 	 	38,780	 	 	35,737	(e)	 	 	41,472 	(e)	 	 	964 	(e)	 	 	7,170 	(e)	 	 	2,431 	(e)	 	 	1,823 	(e)	 	 	0	 	 	 	128,377	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Interest expense	 	 	4,638	 	 	9,657	(f)	 	 	28,394 	(f)	 	 	0	 	 	 	5,179 	(f)	 	 	0	 	 	 	845 	(f)	 	 	0	 	 	 	48,713	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Property operating costs	 	 	26,949	 	 	25,244 	(g)	 	 	76,946 	(g)	 	 	2,371 	(g)	 	 	20,695 	(g)	 	 	3,159 	(g)	 	 	1,782 	(g)	 	 	0	 	 	 	157,146	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Management and leasing fees	 	 	5,155	 	 	3,196	(h)	 	 	7,561	(h)	 	 	238 	(h)	 	 	1,928 	(h)	 	 	255	(h)	 	 
 	257
(h	 
)	 	 	0	 	 	 	18,590	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Amortization of deferred leasing costs	 	 	0	 	 	0	 	 	 	5,188	(j)	 	 	443	(j)	 	 	1,197 	(j)	 	 	369	(j)	 	 	258	(j)	 	 	0	 	 	 	7,455	 	 	 	 	 	 	
General and administrative	 	 	3,244	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	3,244	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Legal and accounting	 	 	1,008	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	1,008	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	79,774	 	 	73,834	 	 	 	159,561	 	 	 	4,016	 	 	 	36,169	 	 	 	6,214	 	 	 	4,965	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	364,533	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	
NET INCOME	 	$	59,854	 	$	37,344	 	 	$	(6,695	)	 	$	793	 	 	$	4,367	 	 	$	(2,018	)	 	$	(284	)	 	$	(237	)	 	$	93,124	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	
EARNINGS PER SHARE, basic and diluted	 	$	0.41	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	$	0.22	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES, basic and diluted	 	 	145,633	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	428,068	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	

(a)	Historical financial information derived from annual report on Form 10-K.	
(b)	Rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis.	
(c)	Consists of operating costs reimbursements.	
(d)	Reflects Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.’s equity in income of the Wells Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture related to the John Wiley Indianapolis Building and the AIU Chicago Building. The pro forma adjustment results from rental revenues less operating expenses, management fees and depreciation.	
(e)	Depreciation expense is recognized using the straight-line method and a 25-year life.	
(f)	Represents interest expense on lines of credit used to acquire assets, which bore interest at approximately 3.99% for the year ended December 31, 2002, interest expense on loan used to acquire the Aon Center Chicago Building, which bore interest at approximately 4.858% for the year ended December 31, 2002 and assumed mortgages on the BMG Greenville Buildings, Nestle Los Angeles Building, Leo Burnett Chicago Building and Wells Washington Properties, which bore interest at approximately 8.5%, 8%, 3.39%, 7.25% and 4.4% for the year ended December 31, 2002, respectively.	
(g)	Consists of operating expenses.	
(h)	Management and leasing fees are generally calculated at 4.5% of rental income and tenant reimbursements.	
(i)	Reflects Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.’s equity in income of Wells/Orange County Associates related to the Cort Furniture Building. The pro forma adjustment results from gross revenues less operating expenses, management fees, administrative costs, depreciation and amortization.	
(j)	Amortization of deferred leasing costs is recognized using the straight-line method over the lives of the respective leases.	
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
 
40

Table of Contents
WELLS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
 
PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF INCOME
 
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
 
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
(Unaudited)
 
 	 	Wells Real
Estate
Investment
Trust,
Inc. (a)

	 	Pro Forma Adjustments

	 	 	Pro
Forma
Total

	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Recent Acquisitions

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	2003
Acquisitions

	 	 	Other

	 	 	Leo
Burnett
Chicago

	 	 	4250 N. Fairfax
Arlington

	 	 	Wells
Washington
Properties

	 	 	Dispositions

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
REVENUES:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Rental income	 	$	202,196	 	$	42,882	(b)	 	$	2,210	(b)	 	$	15,717	(b)	 	$	3,288	(b)	 	$	16,611	(b)	 	$	0	 	 	$	282,904	 	 	 	 	
Tenant reimbursements	 	 	51,531	 	 	20,153	(c)	 	 	1,769	(c)	 	 	14,660	(c)	 	 	1,170	(c)	 	 	514	(c)	 	 	0	 	 	 	89,797	 	 	 	 	
Equity in income of joint ventures	 	 	3,493	 	 	(81	) (d)	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	(176	)(e)	 	 	3,236	 	 	 	 	
Interest and other income	 	 	3,445	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	3,445	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	260,665	 	 	62,954	 	 	 	3,979	 	 	 	30,377	 	 	 	4,458	 	 	 	17,125	 	 	 	(176	)	 	 	379,382	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	
EXPENSES:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Depreciation	 	 	73,241	 	 	15,666	(f)	 	 	723	(f)	 	 	5,378	(f)	 	 	1,823	(f)	 	 	4,101	(f)	 	 	0	 	 	 	100,932	 	 	 	 	
Property operating costs	 	 	75,602	 	 	29,686	(g)	 	 	1,962	(g)	 	 	15,644	(g)	 	 	2,369	(g)	 	 	6,654	(g)	 	 	0	 	 	 	131,917	 	 	 	 	
Asset and property management and leasing fees	 	 	9,060	 	 	3,253	(h)	 	 	179	(h)	 	 	1,445	(h)	 	 	250	(h)	 	 	929	(h)	 	 	0	 	 	 	15,116	 	 	 	 	
Amortization of deferred leasing costs	 	 	1,244	 	 	3,171	(i)	 	 	333	(i)	 	 	898	(i)	 	 	276	(i)	 	 	879	(i)	 	 	0	 	 	 	6,801	 	 	 	 	
General and Administrative	 	 	4,171	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	4,171	 	 	 	 	
Interest expense	 	 	11,178	 	 	9,106	(j)	 	 	0	 	 	 	3,721	(j)	 	 	0	 	 	 	3,801	(j)	 	 	0	 	 	 	27,806	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	174,496	 	 	60,882	 	 	 	3,197	 	 	 	27,086	 	 	 	4,718	 	 	 	16,364	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	286,743	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	
NET INCOME	 	$	86,169	 	$	2,072	 	 	$	782	 	 	$	3,291	 	 	$	(260	)	 	$	761	 	 	$	(176	)	 	$	92,639	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	

	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	
EARNINGS PER SHARE, basic and diluted	 	$	0.30	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	$	0.22	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES, basic and diluted	 	 	289,521	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	428,068	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	 	 	 	

(a)	Historical financial information derived from quarterly report on Form 10-Q.	
(b)	Rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis.	
(c)	Consists of operating costs reimbursements.	
(d)	Reflects Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.’s equity in income of the Wells Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture related to the AIU Chicago Building. The pro forma adjustment results from rental revenues less operating expenses, management fees and depreciation.	
(e)	Reflects Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.’s equity in income of Wells/Orange County Associates related to the Cort Furniture Building. The pro forma adjustment results from gross revenues less operating expenses, management fees, administrative costs, depreciation and amortization.	
(f)	Depreciation expense is recognized using the straight-line method and a 25-year life.	
(g)	Consists of operating expenses.	
(h)	Management and leasing fees are generally calculated at 4.5% of rental income and tenant reimbursements.	
(i)	Amortization of deferred leasing costs is recognized using the straight-line method over the lives of the respective leases.	
(j)	Represents interest expense on lines of credit used to acquire assets, which bore interest at approximately 3.08% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and interest expense on loan used to acquire the Aon Center Chicago Building, which bore interest at approximately 4.17% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and assumed mortgages on the Leo Burnett Chicago Building and Wells Washington Properties, which bore interest at approximately 7.25% and 4.4% for nine months ended September 30, 2003.	
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
 
41